The cryptocurrency market in Poland and its institutional conditions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Since its inception, the cryptocurrency, a lot of controversy and concerns related to the threats posed by trading in virtual currency has aroused. The sharp increase in the value of bitcoin in 2017 had an impact on a significant increase in the interest of investors, institutions and entities related to financial markets, which was not only related to the desire to get rich. Blockchain technology and the cryptocurrency market based on, it enable the development of technology, fast and safe capital flow and have many other applications that may lead to revolutionary changes and discoveries in the future. However, it should also be remembered that the virtual currency market creates conditions for broadly understood criminal and terrorist activities, which pose a threat to the functioning of the entire political and economic system. The key element to ensure full market efficiency and use of the entire range of development opportunities, while maintaining the security of the entities existing in it, is the creation of appropriate institutional conditions that build the market. They will make it possible to maintain a balance between the level of interference in the financial system related to the introduction of virtual currency regulations and the free development of the market and the opportunities it brings.
Downloads
Article Details
The author of the article declares that the submitted article does not infringe the copyrights of third parties. The author agrees to subject the article to the review procedure and to make editorial changes. The author transfers, free of charge, to SGH Publishing House the author's economic rights to the work in the fields of exploitation listed in the Article 50 of the Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights – provided that the work has been accepted for publication and published.
SGH Publishing House holds economic copyrights to all content of the journal. Placing the text of the article in a repository, on the author's home page or on any other page is allowed as long as it does not involve obtaining economic benefits, and the text will be provided with source information (including the title, year, number and internet address of the journal).
References
2. Bankier.pl (2020), Charakter prawny kr-yptowalut, https://www.bankier.pl, 28.07.2020.
3. Birski B. (2017), Prawnopodatkowe aspekty kryptowalut na przykładzie bitcoina. Schemat funkcjonowania kryptowaluty, Wrocław, s. 34.
4. Bitcoin.org (2020), How to use bitcoin, https://bitcoin.org/en/getting-started, dostęp: 10.08.2020.
5. Borodo A. (2005), Polskie prawo finansowe. Zarys ogólny, Toruń.
6. Businessinsider.com (2020), Rynek kryptowalut nie jest w Polsce regulowany. KNF wiele razy zwracała uwagę na problem, https://www.onet.pl, dostęp: 01.08.2020.
7. Case C-264/14, Skatteverket v. David Hedqvist, ECLI:EU:C:2015:718.
8. Chen L.,Wu H. (2020), The Influence of Virtual Money to Real Currency: A Case-based Study, Beijing University.
9. CNN Money (2020), What is bitcoin?, https://money.cnn.com.
10. Coin Desk (2020), Bitcoin Price Index, https://www.coindesk.com, dostęp: 07.08.2020.
11. Pollock D. (2020), The Mess That Was Mt. Gox: Four Years On, Coin Telegraph, https://cointelegraph.com, dostęp: 06.08.2020.
12. Coinmarketcap.com (2020), Top Cryptocurrency Spot Exchanges, https://coinmarketcap.com, dostęp: 09.08.2020.
13. Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
14. FinTech Action Plan: For a More Competitive and Innovative European Financial Sector, COM (2018), 109 final, Mar. 8, 2018.
15. European Commission (2018), European Commission Launches the EU Blockchain Observatory and Forum, Press Release, Feb. 1, 2018.
16. European Parliament (2018), Anti-money Laundering: MEPs Vote to Shed Light on the True Owners of Companies, Press Release, Apr. 19, 2018.
17. E-pity.pl (2020), Kryptowaluty a podatek PIT, https://www.e-pity.pl, 04.08.2020.
18. Ethereum.org (2020), Ethereum for Beginners, https://ethereum.org, dostęp: 01.08. 2020.
19. European Supervisory Authorities, WARNING. ESMA, EBA and EIOPA Warn Consumers on the Risks of Virtual Currencies, Feb. 12, 2018.
20. Finance.yahoo.com (2020), Top 10 cryptocurrencies by market capitalisation, https://finance.yahoo.com, dostęp: 01.08.2020.
21. FXSSI.com (2020), Most Valuable Companies in the World-2020, https://fxssi.com, 10.08.2020.
22. Gajda M., Tarnawska K. (2009), Kontrowersje wokół roli „Paktu Stabilizacji i Wzrostu” jako instrumentu koordynacji polityki gospodarczej w ramach Unii Gospodarczo-Walutowej, Studia i Prace Wydziału Ekonomii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych, Zeszyty Naukowe nr 2, Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, s. 9-28.
23. GitHub (2020), Ripple, https://github.com, dostęp: 02.08.2020.
24. Henextweb.com (2020), Countires hosting Bitcoin nodes, https://thenextweb.com, dostęp: 09.08.2020.
25. Library of Congress (2018), Regulation of Cryptocurrency Around the World, The Law Library of Congress, June 2018.
26. Iso.org (2015), Funkcjonowanie rynku bitcoin, http://www.iso.org, dostęp: 14.04.2015.
27. Litecoin.org (2020), What is Litecoin?, https://www.litecoinpool.org dostęp: 04.08.2020.
28. MarketInsinder.com (2020), Bitcoin Price Index, https://markets.businessinsider.com, dostęp: 07.08.2020.
29. Medium.com (2020), Biggest Bitcoin Hosts, https://medium.com, dostęp: 5.08.2020.
30. Michalczyk W. (2018), Barries of Development of Bitcoin as a New Form of International Money, Wrocław, s. 80.
31. Morawski W. (2001), Socjologia ekonomiczna, Warszawa, WN PWN, s. 27.
32. Oświadczenie Narodowego Banku Polskiego (NBP) i Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF) w sprawie „Wirtualnych walut”, 7 lipca 2017.
33. Projekt ustawy o Centralnej Bazie Rachunków, w wersji z dnia 14 grudnia 2016 r.
34. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purposes of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing and Amending, Directive 2009/101/EC, COM (2016) 450 final, July 5, 2016.
35. PWC.Com (2020), Blockchain security, https://pwc.blogs.com, dostęp: 30.07.2020.
36. Reminanto.Com (2020), Bitcoin Legitimacy Around the World, https://www.fxempire.com, dostęp: 05.08.2020.
37. Robert H. (2019), ITNOW, BEYOND BITCOIN AND THE BLOCKCHAIN.
38. Rusin K. (2020), Zasady rozliczania kryptowalut w 2020 roku, https://podatki.gazetaprawna.pl, dostęp: 09.08.2020.
39. Satoshi Nakamoto (2009), Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
40. Segwick K. (2020), Eight Historic Bitcoin Transactions, Bitcoin.com, https://news.bitcoin.com, dostęp: 10.08.2020
41. Shatin N.T (2018), Does Bitcoin be have a sacurrency?, Hong Kong, China
42. Skowron D. (2019), Bitcoin jako przedmiot zabezpieczenia w postępowaniu karnym, Warszawa.
43. Sobiecki G. (2017), Regulowanie kryptowalut w Polsce i na świecie na przykładzie Bitcoina – status prawny i interpretacja ekonomiczna, Wrocław, s. 4.
44. The Monist (1995), The Virtual Reality od Homo Economicus, t. 78, wyd. 3, 1 lipca 1995, s. 308.
45. University of Northampton (2020), Self-reported motivations for engaging or declining to engage in cyber-dependent offending and the role of autistic traits, United Kingdom.
46. Weber B. (2018), Bitcoin and the legitimacy crisis of money.
47. Wiciak K. (2017), Zapobieganie i zwalczanie cyberprzestępczości, materiały opracowane w ramach szkolenia finansowanego ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój 2014-2020 dla pracowników powszechnych jednostek prokuratury z zakresu prawa gospodarczego.
48. Woźniak M. (2017), Instytucjonalne uwarunkowania spójności społeczno-ekonomicznej, Warszawa.
49. Xiaochua Zhou (2018), Future Regulation on Virtual Currency, Hong Kong, China.
50. Żuławiński M,. Morawiecki G. (2020), We Will Ban Cryptocurrencies or Regulate Them. We Do Not Want Another Amber Gold, Bankier.pl, https://www.bankier.pl, 07.08.2020