Occupational Prestige and Labor Market Institutions

Main Article Content

Jacek Lewkowicz

Abstract

In this paper, we ask a question whether regulation of professions is related to occupational prestige by employees. We investigate, whether legal control of an access to selected professions is related with these professions’ prestige and in which circumstances. The question seems to be significant from the perspective of peoples’ decisions about desired career paths. Occupational prestige may by itself affect utility of workers. Analysis of the determinants of occupational prestige still constitutes an underexploited niche. In this paper we aim to respond to this lacuna and provide a systematic analysis of the problem from institutional perspective. We draw on literature in new institutional economics, law and economics, labor economics, and related fieldsto conceptualize the possible channels and directions of institutions’ impact on occupational prestige. We also conduct the empirical research, basing on the data since 1992 till 2010 for Polish labor market and verify whether conclusions from the literature, are valid in this case. It turned out that factors significant for employee’s subjective prestige perception are restrictions concerning an access to a profession, income, age, education, marital status and parents’ professional prestige. The obtained results contribute to a better understanding of the nature of labor market institutions and their impact on people’s decisions regarding career, and provide theoretical underpinnings for empirical studies. The outcome of the econometric research on the occupational prestige in relation top articular Polish institutional settings serve as a base for polemics with theoretical issues and may be valuable for labor market policy design.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lewkowicz, J. (2018). Occupational Prestige and Labor Market Institutions. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology, 9(18), 79–92. Retrieved from https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/wfes/article/view/3120
Section
Articles

References

Agell, J. (2002), ‘On the Determinants of Labour Market Institutions: Rent Seeking vs. Social Insurance’, German Economic Review 3 (2).
Albeno, P., Garbin, J., Bates, F. (1961), ‘Occupational prestige: an empirical study of its correlates’. Social Forces 40 (2).
Armer, J.M. (1968), ‘Intersociety and Intra society Correlations of Occupational Prestige’, American Journal of Sociology 74 (1).
Barringer, H., Takeuchi, D., Xenos, P. (1990), ‘Education, Occupational Prestige, and Income of Asian Americans’, Sociology of Education 63 (1).
Bergmann, B.R. (1974), ‘Occupational Segregation, Wages and Profits When Employers Discriminate by Race or Sex’, Eastern Economic Journal 1 (2).
Dubow, E.F., Boxer, P., Huesmann, L.R. (2009), ‘Long-term Effects of Parents’ Education on Children’s Educational and Occupational Success: Mediation by Family Interactions, Child Aggression, and Teenage Aspirations’, Merrill Palmer Q, Wayne State Univ. Press, 55 (3).
Ganzach, Y. (1998), ‘Intelligence and job satisfaction’, The Academy of Management Journal 41 (5).
Garbin, A.P., Bates, F.L. (1961), ‘Occupational Prestige: An Empirical Study of its Correlates’, Social Forces 40 (2).
Glick P. (1991), ‘Trait-Based and Sex-Based Discrimination in Occupational Prestige. Occupational Salary and Hiring’, Sex Roles 25 (5/6).
Ganzeboom, H.B.G., De Graaf, P.M., Treiman, D.J. (1992), A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status, Social Science Research 21.
Grodsky, E., Pager, D. (2001), ‘The Structure of Disadvantage: Individual and Occupational Determinants of the Black-White Wage Gap’, American Sociological Review 66 (4).
Haller, A.O., Holsinger, D.B., Saraiva, H.U. (1972), ‘Variations in Occupational Prestige Hierarchies: Brazilian Data’, American Journal of Sociology 77 (5).
Haller, A.O., Lewis, D.M. (1966), ‘The Hypothesis of Inter societal Similarity in Occupational Prestige Hierarchies’, American Journal of Sociology 72 (2).
Jacobs, J., Powell, B. (1985), ‘Occupational Prestige: A Sex-Neutral Concept?’ Sex Roles 12 (9/10).
Leffler, A., Xu, W. (1992). ‘Gender and race effects on occupational prestige, segregation, and earnings’, Gender & Society 6 (3).
Luzzo, D.A. (1996), ‘Exploring the Relationship Between the Perception of Occupational Barriers and Career Development’, Journal of Career Development 22 (4)
Lyons, S.T., Duxbury, L.E., Higgins, Ch.A. (2006), ‘A Comparison of the Values and Commitment of Private Sector, Public Sector, and Parapublic Sector Employees’, Public Administration Review 66 (4)
Magnusson, Ch. (2009), ‘Gender, Occupational Prestige, and Wages: A Test of Devaluation Theory, European Sociological Review 25 (1)
Marsh, R. (1971), The Explanation of Occupational Prestige Hierarchies, Social Forces 50
McLeod, J., Ward, S., Tancill, K. (1965), ‘Alienation and uses of the mass media’, Public Opinion Quarterly 29 (4)
Nakao, K., Treas, J. (1994), ‘Updating Occupational Prestige and Socioeconomic Scores: How the New Measures Measure up’, Sociological Methodology 24
Pascarella, E.T., Smart, J.C., Smylie, M.A. (1992), ‘College tuition costs and early career socioeconomic achievement: do you get what you pay for?’ Higher Education 24 (3)
Pfeffer, J., Ross, J. (1982), ‘The Effects of Marriage and a Working Wife on Occupational and Wage Attainment’, Administrative Science Quarterly 27 (1)
Quinn, R., Mangione, T., de Mandilovitch, M. (1973), ‘Evaluating Working Conditions in America’, Monthly Labor Review 96.
Thielbar, G., Feldman, S. (1969), ‘Occupational stereotypes and prestige’, Social Forces 48
Treas, J., Nakao, K. (1992), ‘The 1989 Socioeconomic Index of Occupations: Construction from the 1989 Occupational Prestige Scores’, GSS Methodological Report 74
Treiman, D.J. (2013), Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. Academic Press, New York
Weaver, Ch. (1977), ‘Relations hips among pay, race, sex, occupational prestige, supervision, work autonomy, and job satisfaction in a national sample’, Personnel Psychology 30 (3)
Weaver, Ch. (1978), ‘Sex Differences in the Determinants of Job Satisfaction’, The Academy of Management Journal 21 (2)