Governing the Innovation

Main Article Content

Antonio Russo

Abstract

This article sums up the results of research oriented to analyze dynamics and outputs related to the development of two different technological parks in the North-East of Italy: the Area Science Park of Trieste and the Vega of Venezia. The research has tried to find an answer to the following question: what is the regulation model more efficient to implement good innovation policies? The article argues that, to achieve an efficient innovation governance, it is needed a strong regulation by the innovation broker - the central hub of the innovation network, able to support interactions among innovation-makers and innovation-takers. To test this hypothesis, the empirical research has used both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. In the Area Science Park, good innovation performance appears strictly connected to strong regulation of the technological transfer process. In the Vega, differently, low innovation performances are combined with weak innovation regulation. The paper concludes that institutional settings at the local level can be powered by a model of governance innovation able to combine autonomous interactions among main actors involved in technological innovation with a strong regulation of the process by the innovation broker.

Article Details

How to Cite
Russo, A. (2012). Governing the Innovation. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology, 3(5), 115–138. Retrieved from https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/wfes/article/view/466
Section
Articles

References

Adams, J. D. (2005), Comparative Localization of Academic and Industrial Spillovers, in: Breschi, S., Malerba, F. (eds.), Clusters, Networks and Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bobbio, L. (2002), Governi locali nelle democrazie contemporanee, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Breschi, S., Malerba, F. (eds.) (2005), Clusters, Networks and Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cowan, R., Jonard, N. (2003), The Dynamics of Collective Invention, Journal of economic behavior and organization: 52, 4: 513-532.
Crouch, C., Le Gales, P., Trigilia, C., Voelzkow, H. (2001), Local Production Systems in Europe. Rise or Demise?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff L. (1997),Universities in the Global Economy: a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, London: Cassel Academic.
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff , L. (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from National systems and »mode 2« to a triple helix of university-industry-government, Research policy, 29, 2: 109-123.
European Union (2004), Technology Transfer Institutions. An overview, Brussels.
Florida, R. (2004), Cities and the Creative Class, London: Routledge.
Gassmann, O. (2006), Opening up the Innovation Process: Towards an Agenda, R&D management, 36, 3: 223-228.
Hirschman, A.O. (1968), The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hirschman, A.O. (1977), A Generalized Linkage Approach to Development, with Special Reference to Staples, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 25: 67-98.
Lester, R.K., Piore, M.J. (2004), Innovation. The Missing Dimension, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. (2008), The Role of Intermediation and Absorptive Capacity in Facilitating University-Industry Linkages: Case Study on High Tech Company in Japan, Technovation, 27, 3: 115-132.
Mayntz, R. (1999), La Teoria della Governance: Sfidee Prospettive, Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 29, 1: 3-21.
Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Dusters, G., Gilsing, G., Vam Den Oordcn, A. (2007), Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity, Research Policy, 36, 7: 1016-1034.
Pugliese, A. (2006), Mezzogiorno, Meridionalismo edEconomia dello Sviluppo, Napoli: Liguori Editore.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1912), Th eorie der Wirtschatfl ichen Entriklung, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.
Sebastiani, C. (2007), La Politica delle Cittŕ, Bologna: il Mulino.
Trigilia, C. (2007), La Costruzione Sociale dellInnovazione. Economia, Societe e Territorio, Firenze: Firenze University Press.