European Trade Union Confederation at the Crossroad: New Challenges and New Roles
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper discusses the role of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) in political processes at the European Union (EU) level. The author presents historical development of the ETUC and its present structure. A detailed account on the evolution in the strategy of the ETUC, shifting from the 'logic of membership' (as an umbrella organisation for only a part of the labour movement across Europe) to the 'logic of influence' (as a powerful actor with monopoly in the interest representation of labour building its capacity to impact decision-making mechanism at the EU level) is delivered. The strategic change has not been a smooth process, as it entails structural adjustments and contributes to identity crisis within the ETUC. The author claims that currently the ETUC attempts to reconcile those two contradicting logics by combining strategy of effective interest representation with the strategy of mass social mobilisation.
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
References
ETUCs vision of Europe, adopted by the 10th Congress in Prague 26-29 May 2003
ETUC (2012), Resolution 5-6 June 2012 - A Social Compact for Europe http://www.etuc.org/ documents/social-compact-europe. ETUC (2013), A new path for Europe: ETUC plan for investment, sustainable growth and quality jobs, Brussels.
ETUC (2011), ETUC Strategy and Action Plan 2011-2015, http://www.etuc.org/etuc-strategy-and-action-plan-2011-2015.
ETUC (1996), European Union Enlargement: Involving social partners - protecting the welfare state, Resolution enacted by the Executive Committee, Brussels 15-16 December.
EurActiv, Bolkestein directive’ to stay, but will be watered down, 21 March 2005 https://www.euractiv.com/section/innovation-industry/news/bolkestein-directive-to-stay-but-will-be-watered-down/.
European Commission, Industrial Relations in Europe 2008/2009, Directorate-General for Employment, Social A0 airs and Equal Opportunities, Unit F.1, Luxembourg: O5 ce for O5 cial Publications of the European Communities: 49.
Gajewska, K. (2008), The Emergence of a European Labour Protest Movement?’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 14(1): 104–210.
Gardawski, J. (2010), ‘Wstęp. Omówienie wyników badań’, in: J. Gardawski (ed.), Polacy pracujący a kryzys fordyzmu, Scholar, Warszawa.
Greenwood, J. (2003), Interest Representation in the European Union, New York: St.Martin’s Press.
Greenwood, J. (2011), Interest Representation in the European Union, Palgrave Macmillian Hyman, R. (2005), ‘Trade Unions and the Politics of the European Social Model’, Economic and Industrial Democracy 26 (1), Sage Publications.
Hyman, R. (2011), Trade Unions, Lisbon and Europe 2020: From Dream to Nightmare, London School of Economics and Political Science Paper 45.
Hyman, R. (2013), ‘European Trade Union and the Long March through the Institutions: From Integration to Contention?’, in: P. Fairbrother, M-A. Hennebert, Ch. Levesque (eds.), Transnational Trade Unionism: Building Union Power, Routledge.
Kirches, C. (2007), ‘" e European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) Development and role of a Bound Giant’, University of Cologne, Paper presented at the International.
Academic Conference ‘Towards Transnational Trade Union Representation? National Trade Unions and European Integration’ Institute for Social Movements, Bochum, 6-8 December.
Kohl, H. (2009), Freedom of association, employees’ rights and social dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe and the Western Balkans, Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Warsaw.
Le Queux, S. (2005), New protest movements and the revival of labour politics – A critical examination, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, Winter: 11(4): 569-588.
Martin, A., Ross, G. (2001), Trade Union Organizing at the European Level: The Dilemma of Borrowed Resources, in: D. Imig. S. Tarrow (eds.), Contentious Europeans, Lanham.
Ramsay, H., (1995), ‘Euro-Unionism and the Great Action. An assessment of the prospects for the European labour movement post-Maastricht’, in: P. Cressey, B. Jones, Work and Employment in Europe: a New Convergence?, Routledge Studies in the European
Economy, Routledge.
Schmitter, Ph.C., Streeck, W. (1999), The Organization of Business Interests, Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies, MPIfG Discussion Paper 1, March
Taylor, G., Mathers, A. (2004), ‘The European Trade Union Confederation at the Crossroads of Change? Traversing the Variable Geometry of European Trade Unionism’, in: European Journal of Industrial Relations, November: 10/(3).
Welz, Ch. (2008), The European Social Dialogue under Article 138 and 139 of the EC Treaty. Actors, Processes, Outcomes, Wolters Kluwer, Law&Business.
http://www.etuc.org/composition-and-organisation
http://www.etuc.org/r/13
http://www.etuc.org/a/1311
http://www.etuc.org/r/13
http://springalliance.eu/node/4