From cultural democratisation to platform-mediated cultural stratification, explaining the transformation of cultural consumption in France and Poland

Main Article Content

Karolina Owczarek-Korba

Abstrakt

Digital platformisation has fundamentally transformed the ways in which culture is produced, circulated and consumed. While digital technologies have significantly expanded opportunities for cultural participation, it remains unclear whether greater accessibility has translated into more equitable forms of cultural democracy or instead generated new mechanisms of cultural inequality. Existing research has extensively examined platform economies, cultural participation and digital transformation, yet these strands of scholarship have rarely been integrated within a comparative framework capable of explaining how platformisation reshapes cultural consumption across different institutional contexts. This article develops an interdisciplinary framework that combines insights from cultural sociology, cultural economics and communication studies to examine the socio-economic transformation of cultural consumption in France and Poland. Adopting a Most Different Systems Design (MDSD), the study draws upon comparative institutional analysis, secondary statistical evidence, European policy documents and qualitative materials derived from research on the transformation of aesthetic standards in digital environments. The article introduces the Platform-Mediated Cultural Stratification (PMCS) Model, which conceptualises platformisation as a sequential process through which expanding digital accessibility is progressively transformed into algorithmically mediated visibility, differentiated opportunities for symbolic recognition and new forms of socio-economic inequality. The comparative findings indicate that, despite substantial differences in national traditions of cultural governance, platformisation produces increasingly convergent mechanisms of cultural consumption
by reorganising visibility through algorithmic recommendation systems and attention-based market dynamics. The article argues that the principal challenge for contemporary cultural democracy no longer concerns access to cultural production itself but the
unequal distribution of visibility and symbolic recognition within platform-governed digital environments. By integrating debates on platformisation, cultural consumption and social stratification, the proposed PMCS Model offers a new theoretical framework for analysing cultural inequalities in the digital age.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Owczarek-Korba, K. (2025). From cultural democratisation to platform-mediated cultural stratification, explaining the transformation of cultural consumption in France and Poland. Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology, 16(32). Pobrano z https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/wfes/article/view/5468
Dział
Articles

Bibliografia

Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13.

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. Basic Books.

Bennett, T., Savage, M., Silva, E., Warde, A., Gayo-Cal, M., & Wright, D. (2009). Culture, class, distinction. Routledge.

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

Cardon, D. (2015). À quoi rêvent les algorithmes. Seuil.

Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce. Harvard University Press.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

European Commission. (2025a). Culture and democracy: The evidence.

European Commission. (2025b). 2030 Digital Decade: Report on the state of the Digital Decade 2025.

European Parliament and Council. (2022a). Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 on Contestable and Fair Markets in the Digital Sector (Digital Markets Act).

European Parliament and Council. (2022b). Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act).

European Parliament and Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).

European Union. (2021). Creative Europe 2021–2027 Programme. Eurostat. (2025a). Culture statistics.

Eurostat. (2025b). Digital skills indicator.

Eurostat. (2025c). ICT usage in households and by individuals.

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

Hausner, J. (Ed.). (2013). Kultura a rozwój. Narodowe Centrum Kultury.

Hesmondhalgh, D. (2019). The cultural industries (4th ed.). Sage.

Ilczuk, D. (2012). Ekonomika kultury. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

INSEE. (2025). Les pratiques numériques des ménages français.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

Jung, B. (2017). Ekonomia cyfrowa. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Kelly, K. (1998). New rules for the new economy. Viking.

Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201–221.

Menger, P.-M. (2014). The economics of creativity. Harvard University Press.

Ministère de la Culture. (2025). Chiffres clés de la culture et de la communication.

Namyślak, B. (2014). Sektor kreatywny w gospodarce regionalnej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego

we Wrocławiu.

Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent

cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292.

Nora, S., & Minc, A. (1980). The computerization of society. MIT Press.

OECD. (2025a). Culture and local development.

OECD. (2025b). Going Digital Toolkit.

Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900–907.

Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & van Dijck, J. (2022). Platforms and cultural production. Polity Press.

Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Wiley.

Reuters Institute. (2025). Digital News Report 2025.

Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications and the public interest (pp. 37–72). Johns Hopkins University Press.

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

Statistics Poland (GUS). (2025a). Kultura w 2024 roku.

Statistics Poland (GUS). (2025b). Społeczeństwo informacyjne w Polsce 2025.

Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge University Press.

Throsby, D. (2010). The economics of cultural policy. Cambridge University Press.

Towse, R. (2019). A textbook of cultural economics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

UNCTAD. (2024). Creative Economy Outlook.

UNESCO. (2022). Re|Shaping policies for creativity.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2024). Culture indicators.

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

Welsch, W. (1997). Undoing aesthetics. Sage.

World Economic Forum. (2025). The Future of Jobs Report 2025.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs