Graduates' Perceptions and Evaluation of Study Programmes: Analytical Framework and Methodological Considerations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper aims to draw scientific attention to the significance and usefulness of socio- logical approach, namely higher education (HE) graduates’ perceptions survey as a one of the mechanisms to collect and use graduate feedback facilitating the study programmes’ evaluation, and in turn, enlarging our knowledge on the enhancement of HE quality, the improvement of graduate employability, and effective ways of smoothing the transition from education to work. The emphasis is being placed on critical description of the analytical framework set out by authors of the international research project - DEHEMS on HE graduates feedback. The DEHEMS project uses secondary - processed data based on primary - raw data as generated by two Europe-wide and large-scale research projects: REFLEX and HEGESCO.
The paper comprises four parts. Firstly, the basic conceptual question is analysed, that is, the role and the need for the use of feedback from graduates collected through national and international surveys perceived as a measure of HE programme evaluation (pro- gramme performance, teaching effectiveness). A particular attention is given to its two main elements: programme activities/components and programme outcomes/impact, as per programmes logic model. The second part is devoted to the discussion on the analyt- ical framework and methodological approach adopted in the DEHEMS study. The third part contains key elements of analytical framework presented in schematic form. Finally, some brief conclusions and further study directions follow.
Downloads
Article Details
References
2. Bielecki P., Polands Business/Economics Graduates’ Perceptions and Evaluation of Study Programmes. Poster presented at the 35th EAIR Annual Forum: “The Impact of Higher Education: Addressing the Challenges of the 21st Century”, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 28-31 August 2013, Rotterdam.
3. Bielecki P., Salazar Zegers J.M., Comparative Analysis of Governmental Interference in Higher Education Programmes. Poster presented at the 26th EAIR Annual Forum: “Knowledge Society Crossroads”, Technical University of Catalonia (UPC), 5-8 Sep- tember 2004, Barcelona.
4. Bradburn E.M., Nevill S., Cataldi E.F., 1992-93 Bachelors Degree Recipients and Their Opinions About Education in 2003, NCES, IES, U.S. Department of Educa- tion, July 2005.
5. Brennan J., Williams R., Collecting and Using Student Feedback. A Guide to Good Practice, CHERI, HEFCE, LTSN, January 2004.
6. Cabrera A.F., Weerts D.J., Zulick B.J., Alumni Survey: Three Conceptualizations to Alumni Research. Paper presented before: Metodos de analisis de la inserción- laboral de los universitarios, Universidad de Leon, Espana, 9-11 de Junio del 2003.
7. DEHEMS Project (DEHEMS - Network for the Development of Higher Education Management Systems); http://www.dehems-project.eu/en/home/
8. DEHEMS Project. Framework Tool for Quality Assurance in Higher Education Systems: Domain Overview of Statistical Data Related to Graduates Employability - Economy [Business and Economics]. Work Package 5. Country: Slovenia, DEHEMS, 2012.
9. Employability of Graduates and Higher Education Management Systems. Final Report of DEHEMS Project, eds. M. Melink, S. Pavlin, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, 2012.; http://www.dehems-project.eu/static/uploaded/files/files/ resoults/DEHEMS_REPORT_final.pdf
10. Estermann T., Nokkala T., Steinel M., University Autonomy in Europe II. The Score- card, European University Association, Brussels 2011.
11. Federkeil G., Graduate Surveys as a Measure in University Rankings. Paper presented at the IMHE OECD 2008 General Conference: Outcomes of Higher Education: Quality Relevance and Impact, 8-10 September 2008, Paris, France.
12. Gajderowicz T., Grotkowska G., Wincenciak L., Graduates’ Job Satisfaction Across Domains of Study, “International Journal of Manpower” 2014, vol. 35, iss. 4.
13. HEGESCO Project (HEGESCO - Higher Education as a Generator of Strategic Competences); http://www.hegesco.org/
14. Information on Quality and Standards in Higher Education. Final Report of the Task Group, HEFCE, 2002.
15. Pavlin S., Wincenciak L., Grotkowska G., Demeter P., Mayrhofer W, Chudzikowski K., Svetlik I., Paletta A., Vidoni D., Addressing Graduates’ Career Success from the Higher Education Perspective - Theoretical and Conceptual Framework, in: Employability of Graduates and Higher Education Management Systems. Final Report of DEHEMS Project, eds. M. Melink, S. Pavlin, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, 2012.
16. REFLEX Project (REFLEX - Flexible Professional in the Knowledge Society); http:// roa.sbe.maastrichtuniversity.nl/?portfolio=reflex-international-survey-higher- education-graduates
17. Schomburg H., Teichler U., Higher Education and Graduate Employment in Europe. Results from Graduate Surveys from Twelve Countries, Springer, Dordrecht 2006.
18. Taylor-Powell E., Henert E., Developing a Logic Model: Teaching and Training Guide, University of Wisconsin-Extension. Cooperative Extension. Program Development and Evaluation, 2008.
19. Worthen B.R., Sanders J.R., Fitzpatrick J.L., Program Evaluation: AlternativeApproaches and Practical Guidelines, Second Edition, Addison Wesley Longman, New York 1997.