Deficyt demokracji w Unii Europejskiej a deficyt wdrażania polityki

Main Article Content

Sylwia Luc

Abstract

One of objections addressed to the European Union is the so called democracy deficit. However, scientists are not unanimous regarding the scale of the deficit. They are also unsure whether the deficit really exists. This results from varied perception of this organisation, which is beyond traditional intergovernmental co-operation and does not meet requirements democratic states need to satisfy. Deficit of democracy is linked to deficit of policy implementation, and it stems from the times of the introduction of homogenious market, assuming, among others, creating equal conditions of competition for entities on the European market. Anti-market attitudes of governments were disclosed while deregulating and liberalising economies concurrently with increasing tensions in member states and low level of social approval for the measures taken within the Union. Despite numerous theories, research papers and discussions, so far it has been impossible to find any uncontroversial solution to the issue of democratic legitimacy and - resulting from it - deficit of policy implementation. The experience of the past years that proves that governments primarily represent interests of individual states, regardless of the extent to which they identify themselves with the ideas of the united Europe. Moreover, changes to the ways of integrating the EU policy prove the thesis that there is some turning towards the model of intergovernmental economic integration. (original abstract)

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

An Agenda for a growing Europe. Making the UE Economic System Deliver, Report of an Independent High-Level Study Group established on the initiative of the President of the European Commission, July 2003.

Celiński A., Lex, –kracja i demos. Rzecz o deficycie demokracji w UE, http//www.knsp.uksw.edu.pl/artykuly/deficyt_ac.pdf Chryssochoou D. N., Demokracja Unii Europejskiej i jej deficyt, w: Unia Europejska, organizacja i funkcjonowanie, red. nauk. M. Cini, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2007.

Ciechański J., Otwarta metoda koordynacji w Unii Europejskiej. Wpływ na politykę społeczną i zatrudnienia nowych państw członkowskich, Scholar 2003.

Cini M., Wdrażanie polityki europejskiej, w: Unia Europejska, organizacja i funkcjonowanie, red. nauk. M. Cini, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2007.

Dehousse R., The Open Method of Coordination: A new Policy Paradigm?, Paper presented at the First Pan-European Conference on European Union Politics “The Politics of European Integration: Academic Acquis and Future Challenges”, Bordeaux, 26-28 September 2002.

Follesdal A. and Hix S., Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the UE: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik, “European Governance Papers”, No. C-05-02.

Grosse T.G., Deficyt demokratyczny w Unii Europejskiej i metody jego przezwyciężania, w: Deficyt demokracji w Unii Europejskiej a europejskie grupy interesów, red. U. Kurczewska, Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2008.

Jesień L., Otwarta metoda koordynacji, jej kontekst europejski i znaczenie dla Polski (Załącznik 1.), w: Polska wobec Strategii Lizbońskiej, Biała Księga Polskiego Forum Strategii Lizbońskiej, Gdańsk – Warszawa 2003.

Junge K., Integracja zróżnicowana, w: Unia Europejska, organizacja i funkcjonowanie, red. nauk. M. Cini, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2007.

Klaus K., Pojęcie i źródła deficytu demokracji w UE, w: „Studia Europejskie” 2004, nr 2.

Krzemiński I., Unia Europejska, demokracja i kryzys, http://www.liberte.pl/kraj/174- unia-europejska-demokracja-i-kryzys-.pdf

Milev M., A ‘Democratic Deficit’ in the European Union?, Étude, http://www.geopolitis.net/EUROPE%20EN%20FORMATION/Democratic%20Defi cit%20in%20the%20European%20Union.pdf

Zeitlin J., Introduction: The Open Method of Coordination in Question, w: The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, P.I.E. – Peter Lang, 2005.