Cognitive Values of the “Patchwork Capitalism” Category: Advantages, Limitations and Research Challenges
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article contributes to a discussion of selected aspects of Juliusz Gardawski and Ryszard Rapacki’s extensive study presenting a new version of the concept of “patchwork capitalism” in Central and Eastern Europe [2021]. The article discusses the differences in the theoretical and methodological assumptions of the “old” and “new” conceptualizations of the “ideal version of patchwork capitalism”, which focuses on the specific institutional architecture of post-communist European Union countries. Questions and suggestions are presented, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the authors’ attempt to develop their own innovative approach to the subject matter. The aim of the article is to contribute to strengthening the cognitive value of the concept of “patchwork capitalism”, making it a more useful theoretical and methodological perspective in the debate on the development directions of Poland, other countries in our subregion, and the EU as a whole. A new conceptualization of “patchwork capitalism”, along with tools for analyzing its various dimensions, has significant cognitive potential that goes beyond conclusions about the “hybrid” or “mixed” nature of the institutional systems of some EU countries. Such a more adequate conceptualization, however, requires some refinement, including incorporating at least some answers to the formulated research questions and suggestions.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
References
European Parliament (2022a). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220429 IPR28226/meps-demand-more-eu-action-to-protect-common-values-in-hungary-and-poland (accessed: 28.04.2023).
European Parliament (2022b). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220909IPR40137/meps-hungary-can-no-longer-be-considered-a-full-democracy (accessed: 28.04.2023).
Gardawski, J. (ed.) (2009). Polacy pracujący a kryzys fordyzmu (Working Poles and the Crisis of Fordism), Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Gardawski, J. et al. (2013). Rzemieślnicy i biznesmeni (Craftsmen and Businessmen), Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Gardawski, J., Rapacki, R. (2021). ‘Patchwork Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe – a New Conceptualization’, Warsaw Forum of Economic Sociology, 24.
Judt, T. (2012). Wielkie złudzenie? Esej o Europie (The Great Illusion? An Essay on Europe), Poznań: Rebis.
Lane, D., Myant, M. (2007). Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries, Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rapacki, R. (2018). ‘Czwarta rewolucja przemysłowa a kierunki ewolucji kapitalizmu patchworkowego w Polsce (The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Directions of Evolution of Patchwork Capitalism in Poland) ’, in: Świat (bez) pracy. Od fordyzmu do czwartej rewolucji przemysłowej. Księga pamiątkowa z okazji 70. rocznicy urodzin prof. Juliusza Gardawskiego, J. Czarzasty, Cz. Kliszko (eds.), Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Rapacki, R. ed. (2019a). Diversity of Patchwork Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe, London and New York: Routledge.
Rapacki, R. ed. (2019b). Kapitalizm patchworkowy w Polsce i w krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej (Patchwork capitalism in Poland and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe), Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
Sadurski, W. (2022). A Pandemic of Populists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Witt M. A., Redding, G. (2013). ‘Asian Business Systems: Institutional Comparison, Clusters and Implications for Varieties of Capitalism and Business Systems Theory’, Socio-Economic Review, 11.