Short and Long-Term Consequences of Further Regulation of the European Union Road Haulage Market

Main Article Content

Przemysław Borkowski
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-6965
Monika Bąk
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7401-7102

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to assess short and long-term consequences of the new regulatory framework in the European Union road haulage market as proposed by the European Commission in the “Mobility package”. The initiative comprises a number of regulations aimed at technical and social aspects of the road haulage market. This study is based on qualitative research and takes into consideration different perspectives of expert knowledge. On the basis of their own methodological background (the evaluation framework and assessment criteria) the authors compare the expected impacts of the regulations on large and small transport enterprises. The assessment is based on a focused group study within Polish and Hungarian transport companies and several external experts’ views (the list of the consulted experts is given in the acknowledgments section) and finalises with conclusions for different EU regions: the central and peripheral EU countries. The aim of this research is to show different aspects of the impact of the proposed measures on different types of transport
businesses in Europe and to demonstrate diverse and sometimes opposite effects. The impacts are assessed against different enterprise types (small vs large transport companies) and a company’s base of operation geographical location (core vs periphery). While the Commission states that the regulation is aimed primarily at equalizing companies’ competitive chances, this study argues that the proposal may in fact lead to the more fragmented and less competitive internal road transport market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Borkowski, P., & Bąk, M. (2019). Short and Long-Term Consequences of Further Regulation of the European Union Road Haulage Market. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, (33), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.33119/JMFS.2018.33.1
Section
Articles

References

Legal documents
1. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 and Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 with a view to adapting them
to developments in the sector, Brussels, COM(2017) 281 final.
2. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/22/EC as regards enforcement requirements and laying down specific rules with respect
to Directive 96/71/EC and Directive 2014/67/EU for posting drivers in the road transport sector, Brussels, COM/2017/0278 final.
3. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/1/EC on the use of vehicles hired without drivers for the carriage of goods by road,
Brussels, COM/2017/0282 final
4. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards on minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs, Brussels, COM/2017/0277.
Compact publications
1. Alises A., Vassallo J. M., 2016. The Impact of the Structure of the Economy on the Evolution of Road Freight Transport: A Macro Analysis from an Input-output Approach. Transportation
Research Procedia, Volume 14, pp. 2870–2879.
2. Alises A., Vassallo J. M., Guzman A. F., 2014. Road freight transport decoupling: A comparative analysis between the United Kingdom and Spain. Transport Policy, Volume 32, pp.186–193.
3. Patorska J., Lauresh K., 2015. Dokąd zmierza jednolity rynek europejski? Wpływ ustawy MiLoG na branżę transportu drogowego w Polsce. Warszawa: Deloitte.
4. Bąk M., Borkowski P., Czuba T., Koźlak A., Zamojska A., 2017. Wpływ rewizji przepisów UE w zakresie międzynarodowego transportu drogowego na przedsiębiorstwa transportowe w Polsce. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Infrastruktury i Budownictwa.
5. Paprocki W., 2015. EU Transport Policy Failure: The Case of Germany’s Mindestlohngesetz. In: M. Bąk (Ed.) Transport Development Challenges in the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings
of the 2015 TranSopot Conference, Springer.
6. Raczkowski K., Schneider F., Laroche F., 2017. The Impact of Regulation of the Road Transport Sector on Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth in the European Union., Warsaw, Linz, Lyon: Motor Transport Institute.
7. Steer D. G., Frisoni R., Dionori F., Vollath C., Tyszka K., Casullo L., Routaboul C., Jarzemskis A., Tanczos K., 2013. Development and implementation of EU road cabotage. Brussels:
European Parliament.
8. Lafontaine F., Malaguzzi V. L., 2009. The deregulation of international trucking in the European Union: form and effect. Journal of Regulatory Economics, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp. 19–44.
9. Ellison R. A., 1985. The impact of transportation deregulation in the United States on Canadian—U. S. distribution channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Volume 13,
Issue 3, pp. 134–145.
10. Hilal N., 2008. Unintended effects of deregulation in the European Union: The case of road freight transport. Sociologie du Travail, Volume 50, Supplement 1, pp. e19–e29.
11. Krugman P., Fujita M., Venables A., 1999. The spatial economy – cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Internet based
1. Eurostat, 2018. Modal split of freight transport, t2020_rk320 dataset from Eurostat database, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
2. Eurostat, 2018a. Road freight transport by journey characteristics, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Road_freight_transport_by_journey_characteristics
3. FTA, 2016. Proposed new European road transport rules raise concerns at FTA, http://www.fta.co.uk/media_and_campaigns/press_releases/2016/20170601‑Proposed-new-european-roadtransport-rules-raise-concerns-at-fta.html
4. Lakshmanan T. R., Anderson W. P., 2002. Transport infrastructure, freight service sector and economic growth. A White Paper for the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/stella/meetings/20020115/Lakshmanan.pdf
5. IRF, 2007. The Socio-Economic Benefits of Roads in Europe, http://www.erscharter.eu/sites/default/files/16_the_socio_economic_benefits_of_roads_in_europe_EN.pdf
6. EC, 2015. An overview of the EU road transport market in 2015. European Commission, DG for Mobility and Transport, May 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/
mobility-package-overview-of-the-eu-road-transport-market-in-2015.pdf
Acknowledgment
The following experts were consulted in order to assess the impact on road transport during 22.11.2017 public hearing on the “Mobility package” – market/social aspects and road charges: Gerard Schipper – Euro Control Route, Florence Berthelot – FNTR, Ferenc Lajkó – Waberer’s International, Pedro Polónio – ANTRAM, Jan Villadsen – 3F Transport.