Organizational Routines and Innovation: Micro and Macro Antecedents
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores the ambiguous nature of organizational routines in regard to generating innovation or innovation routine. Considering the dual character of routine, we conceptualize that routines have inherently a potential to drive changes, therefore, organizational routines should be considered as a trigger of innovation. In order to exploit organizational routines as a vehicle for innovation, managers should be aware that micro and macro level factors influence the dynamics of
routines. Hence, to design proper organizational settings managers should learn about the mechanisms activating learning processes as essential for new knowledge generation as well as for novelty generation through organization built on a routine system.
Downloads
Article Details
References
2. Becker, M. C., 2008. Handbook of organizational routines. Heteltham: Edward Eldgar.
3. Becker, M. C., Knudsen, T. and March, J. G., 2006. Schumpeter, winter, and the sources of novelty. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 353–371.
4. Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., 2005. Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 775–791.
5. Breslin, D., 2011. The Evolving Organizational Routine. In: Belussi, F. and Staber, U., Eds., Managing Networks of Creativity. London: Routledge, pp. 46–62.
6. Cohen, M., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Eoioì, M. and Marengo, L., 2005. Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 5, pp. 653–698.
7. Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G., 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New York: Englewood Cliffs.
8. David, M. and Rowe, F., 2013. The Evolutivity of Organizational Routines: A New Conceptualization of Their Performativity and Their Relation to Information Technologies. European Conference in Information Systems, pp. 1–13.
9. Denrell, J., 2005. Why most people disapprove of Me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 951–978.
10. Dosi, G., Nelson, R. and Winter, S., 2000. Introduction: The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Martin, J. A., 2000. Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal, vol. 21, no. 10–11, pp. 1105–1121.
12. Feldman, M. S., 2000. Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change. Organization Science, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 611–629.
13. Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T., 2003. Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 94.
14. Felin, T. and Foss, N. J., 2011. The endogenous origins of experience, routines, and organizational capabilities: The poverty of stimulus. Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 231–256.
15. Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R. I., 2009. Social Reality, the Boundaries of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, and Economics/How and Why Theories Matter: A Comment on Felin and Foss (2009). Organization Science, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 654–681.
16. Gavetti, G., 2005. Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Capabilities’ Development. Organization Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 599–617.
17. Gavetti, G. and Levinthal, D., 2000. Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 113–137.
18. Geiger, D. and Schröder, A., 2014. Ever-Changing Routines? Toward a Revised Understanding of Organizational Routines between Rule-Following and Rule-Breaking. Schmalenbach Business Review, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 170–191.
19. Gersick, C. J. G. and Hackman, J. R., 1990. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 65–97.
20. Güttel, W. H., 2006. 1 Innovation, Change and Rule-breaking. OLKC Conference University of Warwick, pp. 1–26.
21. Hodgson, G. M., 2003. The Mystery of the Routine: The Darwinian Destiny of an Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Revue Economique, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 355–384.
22. Hodgson, G. M., 2004, The nature and replication of routine. In: Becker, M. C. and Lazarick, N., Eds. Organizational Routines: Advancing Empirical Research. Cheltenham: Edward Eldgar Publishing, pp. 26–44.
23. Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T., 2004. The firm as an interactor: Firms as vehicles for habits and routines. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 281–307.
24. Howard-Grenville, J. A., 2005. The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context. Organization Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 618–636.
25. Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D. and Eisenhardt, K. M., 2008. Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 295–332.
26. Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G., 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 95–112.
27. Levitt, B. and March, J. G., 1988. Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 14, pp. 319–340.
28. Miner, A. S. and March, J. G., 2002. The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 1, p. 174.
29. Nelson, R. and Winter, S., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
30. Nelson, R. R., Peterhansl, A. and Sampat, B., 2004. Why and how innovations get adopted: A tale of four models. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 679–699.
31. Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J., 2011. Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 413–453.
32. Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Becker, M. C. and Liu, P., 2012. Dynamics of Organizational Routines: A Generative Model. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1484–1508.
33. Pentland, B. T. T., Haerem, T. and Hillison, D., 2011. The (N) Ever-Changing World: Stability and Change in Organizational Routines. Organization Science, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1369–1383.
34. Radwan, L. and Kinder, S., 2013. Practising the diffusion of organizational routines. Environment and Planning A, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2442–2458.
35. Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. S., 2011. Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 577–610.
36. Salvato, C. and Rerup, C., 2011. Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 468–490.
37. Schumpeter, J., 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 61–116.
38. Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V., 2012. A Balancing Act: How Organizations Pursue Consistency in Routine Functioning in the Face of Ongoing Change. Organization Science, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 24–46.
39. Tushman, M. L. and Anderson, P., 2004. Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Winter, S. G. and Szulanski, G., 2001. Replication as Strategy. Organization Science, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 730–743.
41. Winter, S. G. S., 2003. Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 991–995.
42. Zbaracki, M. J. and Bergen, M., 2010. When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price Adjustment Routines. Organization Science, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 955–972.