Kulturowe role płci i dzietność w Polsce i Norwegii

Main Article Content

Katarzyna Kocot-Górecka

Abstract

Changing gender roles are increasingly considered as a driving factor of both fertility decline in European countries and its recovery in some of these countries. The fertility decline is attributed to the first stage of the gender revolution when increasing women’s labour force participation is accompanied by some progress in gender equality in the public sphere while in the family life a gender asymmetry remains. During the second stage of the gender revolution the progress towards new roles of men and women in the private sphere takes place – they both are considered as economic providers and careers and share work and family responsibilities (e.g. McDonald 2000b, Goldscheider, Bernhardt, Lappegård 2015, Esping-Andersen, Billari 2015).


The article compares on-going changes in gender roles in Poland and Norway, two countries which are at different stages of this process, and their interplay with fertility (mean number of children and intensions about the second and third child). Attitudes towards gender equality are studied by taking into account views on this issue on one side and sharing care and housework on the other. Data come from the first round of the Generations and Gender Survey. The study has been performed for respondents aged 20–44, living together with a partner and children under 14 years of age.


The descriptive analyses showed that Poles are not only less advanced in gender role changes in two gender dimensions studied: their views on gender roles are more traditional than Norwegian ones, women’s share in family duties is higher contrary to men who contribute less to family responsibilities than women and men in Norway. There is also a higher variation of views and practices among Poles.


In Poland and Norway, egalitarian men participate more in family duties than those who declare traditional views, while egalitarian women are less burdened by home work and care. However, in Norway there is remarkably more egalitarian women with low and medium share of domestic duties in parallel to more numerous egalitarian men who take a great share of family responsibilities.


More egalitarian respondents have fewer children than the traditional ones in both countries. However, the mean number of children among this group of respondents in Norway is higher than in Poland. Moreover, women in both countries are less inclined to declare intensions to have a second or third child when they participate more in care and domestic duties. This relationship has been found for men in Norway as well.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kocot-Górecka, K. (2015). Kulturowe role płci i dzietność w Polsce i Norwegii. Studia Demograficzne, (2(168), pp. 61–88. https://doi.org/10.33119/SD.2015.2.4
Section
Original research papers & review papers

References

[1] Ahn, N., Mira P., 2002, A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. „Journal of Population Economics”, 15, 667–682.
[2] Arpino B., Esping-Andersen G., Pessin L., 2015, How Do Changes in Gender Role Attitudes Towards Female Employment Influence Fertility? A Macro-Level Analysis. „European Sociological Review”, 1–13.
[3] Blossfeld H-P., Drobnič S., (red.) 2001, Careers of Couples in Contemporary Societies: From Male Breadwinner to Dual-Earner Families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[4] D’Addio, A. C., d’Ercole M. M., 2005, Trends and determinants of fertility rates in OECD countries: The role of policies, „OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper”, 27. Paris, OECD.
[5] Del Boca D., Aaberge R., Colombino U., Ermisch J., Francesconi M., Pasqua S., Strom S., 2003, Labour market participation of women and fertility: the effect of social policies. In FRDB Child Conference. Alghero., http://www.frdb.org/upload/file/copy_0_paper_delboca.pdf
[6] Engelhardt, H., Prskawetz A., 2004, On the changing correlation between fertility and female employment over space and time. „European Journal of Population”, 20, 35–62.
[7] Esping-Andersen G., 2009, The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
[8] Esping-Andersen G, Billari F., 2015, Re-theorizing Family Demographics, „Population and Development Review” 41 (1), 1–31.
[9] Frejka T., 2008, Determinants of family formation and childbearing during the societal transition in central and Eastern Europe, [w:] T. Frejka, T. Sobotka, J.M. Hoem, L. Toulemon (red.) Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe, „Demographic Research”, nr 19; Article 22: 139–170.
[10] Gimenez-Nadal J.I., Molina J., Sevilla-Sanz A., 2012, Social norms, partnerships and children, „Review of Economics of the Household”, vol. 10, nr 2, 215–36.
[11] Goldscheider F., Bernhardt E., Lappegård T., 2014, The second half of the gender revolution in Sweden: Will it strengthen the family? Domestic Gender Equality and Modern Family Patterns Working Paper Series, EQUAL WP 07 March 2014.
[12] Goldscheider F., Bernhardt E., Lappegård T., 2015, The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior, Article first published online: 16 Jun 2015, DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x, „Population and Development Review”, vol. 41, Issue 2, 207–239.
[13] Goldscheider F., Oláh L., Puur A., 2010, Reconciling studies of men’s gender attitudes and fertility; Response to Westoff and Higgins, „Demographic Research”, nr 22, 8, 189–198. http://www.demographicresearch.org/Volumes/Vol22/8/
[14] Hawken A., Munck G.L., 2012, Cross-National Indices with Gender-Differentiated Data: What Do They Measure? How Valid Are They? „Social Indicators Research”, 111 (3).
[15] Hobson B., 1990. No Exit, No Voice: Women’s Economic Dependency and the Welfare State. „Acta Sociologica”, 33, 235–50.
[16] Inglehart R., 1977, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Systems among Western Publics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[17] Kałwa D., Klich-Kluczewska B., 2012, Od „Pani domu” do „Panny Nikt”? Krótka historia niepłatnej pracy domowej kobiet w Polsce, w: Nieodpłatna praca kobiet – różowa strefa gospodarki, Fundacja Feminoteka, Warszawa, 20–25.
[18] Kotowska I.E., 1999, Drugie przejście demograficzne i jego uwarunkowania, [w:] I.E. Kotowska (red.), Przemiany demograficzne w Polsce w latach 90. w świetle drugiego przejścia demograficznego, Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
[19] Kotowska I.E., 2005, Work and parenthood: main findings of comparative data analysis and some policy implications, „Studia Demograficzne”, nr 148, 2, 54–82.
[20] Kotowska I.E., 2009, Zmiany modelu rodziny a zmiany aktywności zawodowej kobiet w Europie, [w:] I.E. Kotowska (red.), Strukturalne i kulturowe uwarunkowania aktywności zawodowej kobiet w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.
[21] Kögel T., 2004, Did the association between fertility and female employment within OECD countries really change its sign? „Journal of Population Economics”, 17(1), 45–65.
[22] Lappegård T., Neyer G., Vignoli D., 2015, Three dimensions of the relationship between gender role attitudes and fertility intentions, Stockholm University, Working Paper, 4.
[23] Lesthaeghe R. 2010, The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition, Research Report 10–696, Population Studies Center.
[24] Lesthaeghe R., Kaa D.J. van de, 1986, Twee demografische transities, [w:] D.J. van de Kaa, R. Lesthaeghe (red.), Bevõlking: groei en krimp, Deventer: van Loghem Slaterus.
[25] Matysiak A., 2006, Sharing Professional and household duties within the Polish couples – preferences and actual choices, „Studia Demograficzne”, nr 1, 147, 122–153.
[26] Matysiak A., 2011, Interdependencies between Fertility and Women’s Labour Supply (Dortrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer, European Studies of Population 17).
[27] Matysiak A., Węziak-Białowolską D., 2013, Country-Specific Conditions for Work and Family Reconciliation: An Attempt at Quantification, „Zeszyty naukowe”, nr 31, Instytut Statystyki i Demografii SGH.
[28] McDonald P., 2000a, Gender equity in theories of fertility, „Population and Development Review”, nr 26, 3, 427–439.
[29] McDonald P., 2000b, Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility, „Journal of Population Research”, nr. 17, 1, 1–12.
[30] Orloff A.S., 1993, Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States. „American Sociological Review” 58(3): 303–328.
[31] Puur A., Oláh L.S., Tazi-Preve M.I., Dorbritz J., 2008, Men’s childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century, „Demographic Research”, vol. 19, nr 56, 1883–912.
[32] The Role of Men in Gender Equality – European strategies and insights, 2012, European Commission, DG Justice – Unit D2 Gender equality, December 2012.
[33] Sevilla-Sanz A., 2010, Household division of labor and cross-country differences in household formation rates, „Journal of Population Economics”, vol. 23, nr 1, 225–49.
[34] Siemieńska R., 1996, Kobiety: nowe wyzwania. Starcie przeszłości z teraźniejszością, Instytut Socjologii UW, Warszawa.
[35] Siemieńska R., 2011, Kontrakt płci. Między sferą prywatną i publiczną, w: Gender w społeczeństwie polskim, Slany K., Struzik J., Wojnickiej K., NOMOS, Kraków.
[36] Smith A.J., 2004, Who Cares? Fathers and the Time They Spend Looking After Children, Sociology Working Papers 2004-05, Department of Sociology University of Oxford, www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/swp.html.