Dowody i refutacje: wczoraj i dziś w historyczno-demograficznych studiach nad transformacją postaw prokreacyjnych
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents discussions on transformation of fertility attitudes based on results of studies carried out in the recent decades. The demographic transition theory was accepted as both the well documented description of demographic change and powerful interpretations, which constituted its explanatory and predictive potentials in application to social processes. However, many micro-level and local studies on mechanisms of fertility attitudes change, carried out in the three decades, resulted in diversified views, in general contesting not only findings of the European Princeton Fertility Project by A.Coale and his group but also some of its assumptions. And basic questions related to fertility transition, seemed to be already answered, are asked again. For instance, arguments against the uniform European experience in a fertility decline are strongly voiced while opinions about a diversity in fertility decline patterns receive more support. To present main streams in discussions on fertility transition the author refers to A.MacIntyre's concept of stages in evolution of scientific traditions and T.S.Kuhn's definition of a paradigm. The well grounded overview of important studies in the field during recent 50 years shows different, incoherent explanations of fertility change which cannot be simply referred to accumulated findings due to rich empirical studies. That situation is named by the author as an epistemological crisis in historical research on fertility transition. And concerns about a new theory which would integrate these broad range of findings can be formulated. What seems to be needed is a deeper theoretical reflection instead of new empirical studies by use of more advanced methods.
Article Details
References
[2] Alter G., 1992, Theories of fertility decline: a non-specialist’s guide to the current debate, [w:] The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850–1970: The Quiet Revolution, red. J.R. Gillis, L.A. Tilly, D. Levine, Cambridge (Mass.), 13–27.
[3] Anderton D.L., Bean L.L., 1985, Birth spacing and fertility limitation: a behavioral analysis of a nineteenth-century frontier population, “Demography” 22, 169–183.
[4] Andorka R., 1979, Family reconstitution and types of household structure, [w:] Time Space and Man: Essays on Microdemography, red. J. Sundin, E. Söderlund, Stockholm, 11–33
[5] Anthropological Demography. Toward a New Synthesis, red. D.I. Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago 1997.
[6] Bardet J.-P., Dupaquier J., 1986, Contraception: les Francais les premiers, mais pourquoi?, “Communications” 44(Denatalite: l’anteriorite francaise, 1800–1914), 3– 33.
[7] Bean L.L., Mineau G.P., Anderton D.L., 1990, Fertility Change on the American Frontier. Adaptation and Innovation, Berkeley.
[8] Bengtsson T., Dribe M., 2002, Fertility response to short term economic stress. Deliberate control or reduced fecundability?, “Lund Papers in Economic History” 78, 1–39.
[9] Bengtsson T., Dribe M., 2004, Deliberate control in a natural fertility population: southern Sweden 1766–1865, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, MA, Boston, kwiecień 2004.
[10] Berkner L.K., Mendels F., 1978, Inheritance systems, family structure, and demographic patterns in Western Europe, 1700–1900, [w:] Historical Studies of changing fertility, red. C. Tilly, New Jersey, 209–225.
[11] Blake J., 1985, The fertility transition: continuity or discontinuity with the past?, Proceedings of International Population Conference, Florence t. 4, Liege 1985, 393–405.
[12] Brown J.C., Guinnane T.W., 2001, Fertility transition in Bavaria, “Center Discussion Paper” No. 821, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
[13] Brown J.C., Guinnane T.W., 2003, Two statistical problems in the Princeton Project on the European fertility decline, “Center Discussion Paper” No. 869, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
[14] Brown J.C., Guinnane T.W., 2005, Fertility and migration in Munich, 1850–1914: evidence from the Polizeimeldebögen, Paper presented to 12. Herbsttagung des Arbeitskreises Historische Demographie: Geburtenbeschränkung in Historischer Perspektive, 4–5.11.2005, Bremen.
[15] Burch T.K., 1996, Icons, strawmen, and precision: reflections on demographic theories of fertility decline, “The Sociological Quarterly” 37, 59–81.
[16] Burch T.K., 2000, Explaining human fertility: one theory or many theories?, “Discussion Paper” 00–3, Population Studies Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, May 2000.
[17] Burch T.K., 2003, Demography in a new key: a theory of population theory, “Demographic Research” 9, article 11, published 05 December, www.demographic-research.org.
[18] Caldwell J.C., 1996, Demography and social science, “Population Studies” nr 3, 305–303.
[19] Caldwell J.C., Caldwell B.K., 2003, Pretransitional population control and equilibrium, “Population Studies” 57, nr 2, 199–215.
[20] Carlsson G., 1966, The decline of fertility: innovation or adjustment process, “Population Studies” nr 2, 149–174.
[21] Carr-Saunders A.M., 1922, The Population problem: a study in human evolution, Oxford.
[22] Chesnais J.-C., 1992, The demographic transition. and economic implications. A longitudinal study of sixty-seven countries, Oxford.
[23] Child-spacing in tropical Africa: traditions and change, red. H.J. Page, R. Lesthaeghe, London 1981.
[24] Cleland J., Wilson Ch., 1987, Demand theories of the fertility transition: an iconoclastic view, “Population Studies” 41, 5–30.
[25] Coale A.J., 1971, Age patterns of marriage, “Population Studies” 25, nr 2, 193–214.
[26] Coale A.J., 1971a, The decline of fertility in Europe from the French Revolution to World War II, [w:] Fertility and family planning: a world view, red. S.J. Behrman, L. Corsa i R. Freedman, Ann Arbor, 3–24.
[27] Coale A.J., 1973, The demographic transition reconsidered, Proceedings of the International Population Conference, Liege, tom 1, 53–73.
[28] Coale A.J., 1986, The decline of fertility in Europe since the eighteenth century as a chapter in human demographic history, [w:] The decline of fertility in Europe, red. A.J. Coale, S.C. Watkins, Princeton.
[29] Coale A.J., 1994, Conference on European fertility, Bellagio — July 1968, “Office of Population Research Working Paper” 94-2, Princeton University.
[30] Coale A.J., Trussell J.T., 1974, Model fertility schedules: variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations, “Population Index” 40, nr 2, 185–258.
[31] Coale A., Trussell J.T., 1996, The development and use of demographic models, “Population Studies” 50, nr 3, 469–484.
[32] David P.A., Mroz T.A., Wachter K.A., 1985, Rational strategies of birth-spacing and fertility regulation in rural France during the Ancien Régime (maszynopis powielony), Working paper No. 14, Stanford Project on the History of Fertility Control, Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford.
[33] David P.A., Mroz T.A., 1989, Evidence of fertility regulation among rural French villagers, 1749–1789: a sequential econometric model of birth-spacing behaviour (part 1), „European Journal of Population” 5, nr 1, 1–26.
[34] David P.A., Mroz T.A., 1989a, Evidence of fertility regulation among rural French villagers, 1749–1789: a sequential econometric model of birth-spacing behaviour (part 2), „European Journal of Population” 5, nr 2, 173–206.
[35] David P.A., Sanderson W.C., 1979,Evidence and measures of fertility control from cohort parity distribution analysis (maszynopis powielony), Working paper No. 2, Stanford Project on the History of Fertility Control, Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford.
[36] David P.A., Sanderson W.C., 1986, Rudimentary contraceptive methods and the American transition to marital fertility control, 1855–1915, [w:] Long-term factors in American economic growth, red. S.L. Engerman, R.E. Gallman, Chicago, 307–390.
[37] Davis K., 1945, The world demographic transition, “The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science” 237, 1–11.
[38] Davis K., 1963, The theory of change and response in modern demographic history, “Population Index” 29, nr 4, 345–366.
[39] Davis K., Blake J., 1956, Social structure and fertility: an analytic framework, “Economic Development and Cultural Change” 4, nr 3, 211–235.
[40] Demeny P., 1968, Early fertility decline in Austria-Hungary: a lesson in demographic transition, “Daedalus” 97, nr 2, 502–522.
[41] Dupâquier J., Lachiver M., 1969, Sur les débuts de la contraception en France ou les deux malthusianismes, “Annales ESC” 24, nr 6, 1391–1406.
[42] Ewbank D., 1993, Coarse and refined methods for studying the fertility transition in historical populations, [w:] Old and new methods in historical demography, red. D.S. Reher, R. Schofield, Oxford, 345–360.
[43] Fisher K., 2000, Uncertain aims and tacit negotiation: birth control practices in Britain, 1925–50, “Population and Development Review” 26, nr 2, 295–317.
[44] Fisher K., Szreter S., 2003, „They prefer withdrawal”: the choice of birth control in Britain, 1918–1950, „Journal of Interdisciplinary History” 34, nr 2, 263–291.
[45] Freedman R., 1961–1962, The sociology of human fertility: a trend report and bibliography, “Current Sociology” 10/11, nr 2, 35–119.
[46] Fricke T., 1997, Culture theory and demographic process: toward a thicker demography, [w:] Anthropological demography. Toward a new synthesis, red. D.I. Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago 248–277.
[47] Friedlander D., Okun B.S., 1995, Pretransition marital fertility variation over time: was there deliberate control in England?, “Journal of Family History” 20, nr 2, 139–158.
[48] Friedlander D., Okun B.S., Segal S., 1999, The demographic transition then and now: processes, perspectives and analyses, “Journal of Family History” 24, nr 4, 493–533.
[49] Friedlander D., Eisenbach Z., Goldscheider C., 1980, Family-size limitation and birth spacing: the fertility transition of African and Asian immigrants in Israel, “Population and Development Review” 6, nr 4, 581–593.
[50] Furet F., 1984, Quantitative history, [w:] F. Furet, The workshop of history, Chicago, 40–53.
[51] Galloway P.R., Hammel E.A., Lee R.D., 1994, Fertility decline in Prussia 1875 to 1910: a pooled cross-section time series analysis, “Population Studies” 48, nr 1, 135–136.
[52] Garrett E., Reid A., Schürer K., Szreter S., 2001, Changing family size in England and Wales. Place, class and demography, 1891–1911, Cambridge.
[53] Gaunt D., 1973, Family planning and the preindustrial society: some Swedish evidence, [w:] Aristocrats, farmers, proletarians: essays in Swedish demographic history, “Studia Historica Uppsaliensia” 47, 28–59.
[54] Gehrmann R., 1984, Leezen 1720–1870. Ein historisch-demographischer Beitrag zur Sozialgeschichte des ländlichen Schleswig-Holsteins, „Studien zur Wirtschafts und Sozialgeschichte Schleswig-Holsteins“ Band – tom, 7, Neumünster.
[55] Giere R.N., 1999, Science without Laws, Chicago.
[56] Greenhalgh S., 1990, Toward a political economy of fertility: anthropological contributions, “Population and Development Review” 16, nr 1, 85–106.
[57] Greenhalgh S., 1995, Anthropology theorizes reproduction: integrating practice, political economic, and feminist perspectives, [w:] Situating fertility. Anthropology and demographic inquiry, red. S. Greenhalgh, Cambridge, -28.
[58] Greenhalgh S., 1996, The social construction of population science: an intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography, “Comparative Studies in Society and History” 38, 26–66.
[59] Guinnane T.W., Okun B.S., Trussel J., 1994, What do we know about the timing of fertility transitions in Europe?, “Demography” 31, nr 1, 1–20.
[60] Haines M., 1979, Fertility and occupation. Population patterns in industrialization, New York.
[61] Haines M., 1992, Occupation and social class during fertility decline: historical perspectives, [w:] The European experience of declining fertility, 1850–1970: the quiet revolution, red. J.R. Gillis, L.A. Tilly, D. Levine, Cambridge (Mass.), 193–226.
[62] Hammel E.A., 1995, Economics 1, culture 0: fertility change and differences in the northwest Balkans, 1700–1900, [w:] Situating fertility. Anthropology and demographic inquiry, red. S. Greenhalgh, Cambridge, 225–258.
[63] Heckman J., Willis R., 1975, Estimation of the stochastic model of reproduction: an econometric approach, [w:] Household production and consumption, red. N. Tereleckzj, New York, 99–138.
[64] Henry L., 1961, Some data on natural fertility, “Eugenics Quarterly” 8, 81–91.
[65] Henry L., 1961a, La fécondité naturelle. Observation-théorie-résultats, „Population” 16, 625–636.
[66] Henry L., 1968, Historical demography, “Deadalus” 97, nr 2, 385–396.
[67] Henry L., 1981, Demografia i historia, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 43, 310–311.
[68] Hirschman Ch., 1994, Why fertility changes?, Situating fertility. Anthropology and demographic inquiry, “Annual Review of Sociology” 20, 203–233.
[69] Kertzer D.I., 1997, Qualitative and quantitative approaches to historical demography, “Population and Development Review” 23, nr 4, 839–846.
[70] Kertzer D.I., Hogan D.P., 1989, Family, political economy, and demographic change: the transformation of life in Casalecchio, Italy, 1861–1921, Madison (Wisc.).
[71] Kirk D., 1996, Demographic transition theory, “Population Studies” 50, nr 3, 361–387.
[72] Kirk D., 1944, Population changes and the postwar world, “American Sociological Review” 9, nr 1, 28–35.
[73] Knodel J., 1974, The Decline of fertility in Germany, 1871–1939, Princeton.
[74] Knodel J., 1977, Family limitation and the fertility transition: evidence from age patterns of fertility in Europe and Asia, “Population Studies” 31, nr 2, 219–249.
[75] Knodel J., 1978, Natural fertility in pre-industrial Germany, “Population Studies” 32, nr 3, 481–510.
[76] Knodel J., 1987, Starting, stopping and spacing during the early stages of fertility transition: the experience of German village populations in the 18th and 19th centuries, Demography 24, nr 2, 143–162.
[77] Knodel J., 1988, Demographic behavior in the past. A study of fourteen German village populations in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Cambridge.
[78] Knodel J., van de Walle E., 1979, Lessons from the past: policy implications of historical fertility studies, “Population and Development Review” 5, nr 2, 217–245.
[79] Kreager P., Demography in situ, „Population and Development Review” 8, 1982, nr 2, 237–266.
[80] Kuhn T.S., 1977, Posłowie do Struktury rewolucji naukowych, „Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa” 13, 94–115.
[81] Kuhn T.S., 2001, Struktura rewolucji naukowych, przekład H. Ostromęcka, Warszawa.
[82] Kuhn T.S., 1985, Raz jeszcze o paradygmatach, [w:] T.S. Kuhn, Dwa bieguny. Tradycja i nowatorstwo w badaniach naukowych, przekład S. Amsterdamski, Warszawa, 406-439.
[83] Kuhn T.S., 2003, Współmierność, porównywalność, komunikowalność, [w:] Droga po strukturze. Eseje filozoficzne z lat 1970–1993, red. J. Sonant, J. Haugeland, przekład S. Amsterdamski, Warszawa, 35–57.
[84] Lee R.D., Galloway P.R., Hammel E.A., 1994, Fertility decline in Prussia: estimating influences on supply, demand and degree of control, “Demography” 31, nr 2, 347–373.
[85] Lee W.R., 1977, Population growth, economic development and social change in Bavaria, 1750–1850, New York.
[86] Leibenstein H., 1957, Economic backwardness and economic growth, Princeton.
[87] Leibenstein H., 1974, An interpretation of the economic theory of fertility: promising path or blind alley?, “Journal of Economic Literature” 12, nr 2, 458–460.
[88] Lockridge K.A., 1983, The fertility transition in Sweden: a preliminary look at smaller geographic units, 1855–1890, Umeå. książka
[89] MacIntyre A., 1988, Whose justice? Whose rationality?, Notre Dame.
[90] Mason K.O., 1997, Explaining fertility transitions, “Demography” 34, nr 4, 443–454.
[91] McDonald P., 1993, Fertility transition hypotheses, [w:] The revolution in Asian fertility: dimensions, causes and implications, red. R. Leete, I. Alam, Oxford, 3–14.
[92] McDonald P., 2001, Theory pertaining to low fertility (maszynopis powielony), paper presented at International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Tokyo, March 2001.
[93] McLaren A., 1978, Birth control in nineteenth-century England, London.
[94] McLaren A, 1984, Reproductive rituals: the perception of fertility in England from the sixteenth to the nineteenth century, London.
[95] Mroz T.A., Weir D.R., 1990, Structural change in life cycle fertility during the fertility transition: France before and after the Revolution of 1789, “Population Studies” 44, nr 1, 61–87.
[96] Natural fertility. Patterns and determinants of natural fertility: proceedings of a seminar, red. H. Leridon, J. Menken, 1979, Liege.
[97] Notenstein F.W., 1945, Population – the long view, [w:] Food for the world, red. T.W. Schultz, Chicago, 36–57.
[98] Okólski M., 1987, Refleksje nad mechanizmem przejścia demograficznego, „Studia Demograficzne” 88, nr 2, 33 nn.
[99] Okólski M., 1990, Status naukowy teorii przejścia demograficznego, [w:] Teoria przejścia demograficznego, red. M. Okólski, Warszawa, 106–114.
[100] Okun B.S., 1994, Evaluating methods for detecting fertility control: Coale and Trussel’s model and Cohort Parity Analysis, “Population Studies” 48, nr 2, 193–222.
[101] Okun B.S., 1995, Distinguishing stopping from spacing behavior with indirect methods, “Historical Methods” 28, nr 2, 85–96.
[102] Pomorski J., 1985, Paradygmat „New Economic History”. Studium z teorii rozwoju nauki historycznej, Lublin.
[103] Preston S.H., 2005, Ansley Johnson Coale: biographical memoirs, “Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society” 149, nr 2, 249–253.
[104] Richards T., 1977, Fertility decline in Germany: an econometric appraisal, “Population Studies” 31, 537–553.
[105] Rosenthal P.-A., 1997, Thirteen years of debate: from population history to French historical demography (1945–1958), “Population: An English Selection” 9, 215–241.
[106] Rosenthal P-A., 2003, The novelty of an old genre: Louis Henry and the founding of historical demography, “Population: An English Selection” 58, 97–130.
[107] Saito O., 1996, Historical demography: achievements and prospects, “Population Studies” 50, nr 3, 537–553.
[108] Santow G., 1995, Coitus interruptus and the control of natural fertility, “Population Studies” 49, nr 1, 19–43.
[109] Scheper-Hughes N., 1997, Demography without numbers, [w:] Anthropological demography. Toward a new synthesis, red. D.I. Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago, 201–222.
[110] Schneider J., Schneider P., 1984, Demographic transitions in a Sicilian town, “Journal of Family History” 9, nr 3, 245–273.
[111] Schneider J., Schneider P., 1992, Going forward in reverse gear: culture, economy, and political economy in the demographic transitions of a rural Sicilian town, [w:] The European experience of declining fertility, 1850–1970: the quiet revolution, red. J.R. Gillis, L.A. Tilly, D. Levine, Cambridge (Mass.), 146–174.
[112] Seccombe W., 1990, Starting to stop: working class fertility decline in Britain, “Past and Present” 126, 51–188.
[113] Segalen M., 1992, Exploring a case of late French fertility decline: two contrasted Breton examples, [w:] The European experience of declining fertility, 1850–1970: the quiet revolution, red. J.R. Gillis, L.A. Tilly, D. Levine, Cambridge (Mass.), 227–247.
[114] Situating Fertility. Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, red. S. Greenhalgh, Cambridge 1995.
[115] Smith D.S., 1987, Early fertility decline in America: a problem in family history, “Journal of Family History” 12, nr 1–3, 73–84.
[116] Sogner S., 2003, Abortion, birth control and contraception: fertility decline in Norway, “Journal of Interdisciplinary History” 34, 209–234.
[117] Szołtysek M., 2003, Demografia historyczna i co dalej? Nowe perspektywy w badaniach nad historią rodziny XVI–XIX wieku, „Roczniki Dziejów Społecznych i Gospodarczych” 63, 119–143.
[118] Szołtysek M., 2005. Co wiemy dziś o teorii przejścia demograficznego, i co z tego wynika dla polskich badań demograficzno-historycznych?, referat wygłoszony na posiedzeniu Sekcji Demografii Historycznej KND PAN, Warszawa, maj 2005.
[119] Szołtysek M., 2005, Rozrodczość w perspektywie ekonomicznej i demografia przeszłości, „Roczniki Dziejów Społecznych i Demograficznych” 65, 25–52.
[120] Szreter S., 1996, Fertility, Class and Gender in Britain, 1860–1940, Cambridge.
[121] Szreter S., Sholkamy H., Dharmalingam A., 2004, Contextualizing categories: towards a critical reflexive demography, [w:] Categories and Contexts. Anthropological and Historical Studies in Critical Demography, red. S. Szreter, H. Sholkamy, A. Dharmalingama, Oxford, 3–32.
[122] Szterer S., Nye R.A., Van Poppel F., 2003, Fertility and contraception during the demographic transition: qualitative and quantitative approaches, “Journal of Interdisciplinary History” 34, nr 2, 152–153.
[123] Teoria przejścia demograficznego, red. M. Okólski, Warszawa 1990.
[124] The decline of Fertility in Europe, red. A.J. Coale, S.C. Watkins, Princeton 1986.
[125] Timothy B.J., Guinnane W., 2003, Two statistical problems in the Princeton Project on the European fertility decline, Economic Growth Center, “Center Discussion Paper” No. 869, Yale University.
[126] Topolski J., 1983, Teoria wiedzy historycznej, Poznań.
[127] University of California Prussian Project, Final report on the project: economic and cultural factors in demographic behavior (R01 HD25841), http://www.demog.berkeley.edu/prussia/prussia.report.pdf
[128] Van Bavel J., 2003, Birth spacing as a family strategy: evidence from 19th century Leuven, Belgium, “History of the Family ” 8, 585–604.
[129] Van Bavel J., 2004, Deliberate birth spacing before the fertility transition in Europe: evidence from 19th century Belgium, “Population Studies” 58, 95–107.
[130] Van Bavel J., 2004, Detecting stopping and spacing behaviour in historical demography: a critical review of methods, “Population-E” 59, nr 1, 1–12.
[131] Van Bavel J., Kok J., 2004, Birth spacing in the Netherlands. The effects of family composition, occupation and religion in birth intervals, 1820–1885, “European Journal of Population” 20, 119–140.
[132] Van Bavel J., Kok J., 2005, Are deliberate birth spacing effects in fact statistical and bio-demographic artifacts? A critical study with data from the Netherlands, the paper presented at the XXVth IUSSP International Population Conference in Tours, France, July 2005, session 161.
[133] Van de Kaa D.J., 1996, Anchored narratives: the story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility, “Population Studies” 50, nr 3, 388–432.
[134] Van de Walle E., 1980, Motivations and technology in the decline of French fertility, [w:] Family and sexuality in French history, red. R. Wheaton, T.K. Hareven, Philadelphia, 135–178.
[135] Van de Walle E., Fertility transition, conscious choice and numeracy, “Demography” 29, nr 4, 487–502.
[136] Van de Walle E., Kantrow L., 1974, Historical demography: a bibliographical essay, “Population Index” 40, nr 4, 611–623.
[137] Vann R.T., Eversley D., 1992, Friends in life and death. The British and Irish Quakers in the demographic transition, 1650–1900, Cambridge.
[138] Watkins S.C., 1986, Conclusions, [w:] The Decline of Fertility in Europe, red. A.J. Coale i S.C. Watkins, Princeton, 420–449.
[139] Watkins S.C., 1991, From Provinces into Nations:The Demographic Integration of Western Europe, 1870–1960, Princeton.
[140] Weir D.R., 1983, Fertility Transition in Rural France, 1740–1829, niepublikowana praca doktorska, Stanford University.
[141] Wetherell Ch., 2001, Another look at Coale’s indices of fertility, “Social Science History” 4, 589–608.
[142] Wilson Ch., 1984, Natural fertility in pre-industrial England, 1600–1799, “Population Studies” 38, nr 2, 225–240.
[143] Wrigley E.A., 1966, Family limitation in preindustrial England, “Economic History Review” 19, nr 1, 82–109.