Ponowoczesne rozterki demografii, czyli kto się boi postmodernizmu? Uwagi w związku z pracą Nancy E. Riley i Jamesa McCarthy’ego, Demography in the age of the postmodern, Cambmbridge 2003.
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 15, 2006
Keywords:
postmodernism, postmodernizm, demografia, demography
Main Article Content
Abstract
(Fragment wstępu:) Mechanizmy postępu naukowego wciąż zajmują filozofów nauki. Pozostaje przedmiotem sporu, czy jest on efektem ciągłego falsyfikowania kolejnych propozycji teoretycznych, następstwa niewspółmiernych paradygmatów czy raczej rozwoju programów badawczych o coraz większym potencjale wyjaśniania i predykcji. Nie ulega jednak wątpliwości, że czynnikiem, który postawił w stan alarmu, a zdaniem niektórych zrewolucjonizował nauki społeczne i humanistykę ostatnich dekad, był zespół propozycji teoretycznych, metodologicznych i epistemologicznych określanych mianem postmodernizmu. Krytyka postmodernistyczna znalazła szeroki oddźwięk nie tylko w sztuce, filozofii i literaturze, lecz także w obszarze antropologii, historii, socjologii, a nawet ekonomii. Pewne jej elementy zostały zaakceptowane w naukach społecznych i humanistyce mimo to, że oprócz zwolenników posiadają zagorzałych przeciwników.
Article Details
How to Cite
Szołtysek, M. (2006). Ponowoczesne rozterki demografii, czyli kto się boi postmodernizmu? Uwagi w związku z pracą Nancy E. Riley i Jamesa McCarthy’ego, Demography in the age of the postmodern, Cambmbridge 2003. Studia Demograficzne, (1(149), 89–109. Retrieved from https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/SD/article/view/2626
Section
Brief communications
References
[1] After Writing Culture: Eistemology and Paxis in Contemporary Athropology, red. A. James, J.L. Hockey, A. Dawson, 1997, New York.
[2] Alexander J., 1991, General theory in the postpositivist mode: the „epistemological dilemma” and the search for present reason, [w:] Postmodernism and Social Theory. The Debate over General Theory, red. S. Seidmand, D.G Wagner, Oxford, 326–368.
[3] Alway J., 1995, The trouble with gender: tales of the still-missing feminist revolution in sociological theory, „Sociological Theory” 13, nr 3, 209–228.
[4] Becker G.S., 1990, Ekonomiczna teoria rozrodczości, [w:] Becker G.S., Ekonomiczna teoria zachowań ludzkich, Warszawa, 297–333.
[5] Best S., Kellner D., 1997, The Postmodern Turn, New York.
[6] Blake J., 1961, Family Structure in Jamaica. The Social Context of Reproduction (współpraca J.M. Stycos i K. Davis), New York.
[7] Blake J., Davis K., 1963, Population and public opinion: the need for basic research, „American Behavioral Scientist” 6, nr 9, 24–29.
[8] Blake J., 1964, Issues in the training and recruitment of demographers, „Demography” 1, 258–63.
[9] Bogue D.J., 1997, Preface, [w:] Defining A new Demography: Curriculum Needs for the 1990’s and Beyond, red. D.J. Bogue, Chicago, s. i-vi.
[10] Bourque L.B., 1995, A biographical essay on Judith Blake’s professional career and scholarship, „Annual Review of Sociology” 21, 449–477.
[11] Brown S., 1995, Postmodern Marketing, London.
[12] Bryman A., 1988, Quantity and Quality in Social Research, London.
[13] Burch T.K., 2000, Explaining human fertility: one theory or many theories?, Discussion Paper 00–3, Population Studies Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
[14] Burch T.K., 2003, Demography in a new key: a theory of population theory, „Demographic Research” 9 (www.demographic–research.org), 264–284.
[15] Caldwell J.C., 1996, Demography and social science, „Population Studies” 50, nr 3, 305–333.
[16] Caldwell J.C., 2000, Demography: scope, perspectives, theory, Working Paper, Health Transition Centre and National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra.
[17] Caldwell J.C., Caldwell P., Orubuloye I., 1998, Methodological advances in studying the social context of AIDS in West Africa, [w:] The Methods and Uses of Anthropological Demography, red. A.M. Basu, P. Aaby, Oxford.
[18] Categories and Contexts. Anthropological and Hhistorical Studies in Critical Demography, red. S. Szreter, H. Sholkamy, A. Dharmalingam, Oxford 2004.
[19] Census and Identity. The Politics of Race, Ethnicity and Language in National Censuses, red. D.I. Kertzr, D. Ariel, Cambridge 2002.
[20] Chakrabarty D., 2003, Postkolonialność a podstęp historii: kto wypowiada się w imieniu przeszłości Indii?, przeł. D. Vogel, „Konteksty. Polska Sztuka Ludowa” 2003, nr 3–4, 117–132.
[21] Coale A.J., 1973, The demographic transition reconsidered, [w:] International Population Conference, Liege, 1973, Liege, t. 1, 53–72.
[22] Coale A.J., Hoover E.M., 1958, Population Growth and Economic Development in Low-income Countries: A Case Study of India’s Prospects, Princeton.
[23] Conceiving the New World order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, F.D. Ginsburg, R. Rapp, Berkeley 1995.
[24] Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, red. I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave, 1970, London.
[25] David P.A., Mroz T.A., Wachter K.W., 1985, Rational Sstrategies of Birth-spacing and Fertility Regulation in Rural France During the Ancien Regime, Stanford Profect for the History of Fertility Control, Working Paper no. 14, March.
[26] Davis K., 1980, A Structural Analysis of Kinship: Prolegomena to The Sociology of Kinship, New York.
[27] Davis K., Blake J., 1956, Social structure and fertility: an analytic framework, „Economic Development and Cultural Change” 4, nr 3, 211–235.
[28] Dogan M., Pahre R., 1990, Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Boulder.
[29] Domańska E., 1998, Encounters: Philosophy of History after Postmodernism, Charlottesville.
[30] Donaldson P.J., 2001, Using photographs to strengthen family planning research, „International Family Planning Perspectives” 27, nr 3, 176–179.
[31] Eckberg D.L., Hill L., Jr., 1980, The paradigm concept and sociology: a critical review, [w:] Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, red. G. Gutting, Notre Dame, 117–136.
[32] Foucault M., 1973, The Order of Things. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York.
[33] Frątczak E., Gach-Ciepiela U., Babiker H., 2005, Analiza historii zdarzeń. Elementy teorii, wybrane przykłady zastosowań, Warszawa.
[34] Freedman R., 1961–1962, The sociology of human fertility: a trend report and bibliography, „Current Sociology” 10/11, nr 2, 35–119.
[35] Fricke T., 1997, Culture theory and demographic process: toward a thicker demography, [w:] Anthropological Demography. Toward a New Synthesis, red. D.I., Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago-London, 48.
[36] Fricke T., Axinn W.G., Thornton A., 1993, Marriage, social inequality, and women’s contact with their natal families in alliance societies – two Tamang examples, „American Anthropologist” 95, nr 2, 395–419.
[37] Fuchs S., Ward S., 1994, What is deconstruction, and where and when does it take place? Making facts in science, building cases in law, „American Sociological Review” 59, nr 4, 481–500.
[38] Greenhalgh S., 1996, The social construction of population science: an intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography, „Comparative Studies in Society and History” 38, 26–66.
[39] Greenhalgh S., 1997, Methods and meanings: reflections on disciplinary difference, „Population and Development Review” 23, nr 4, 819–824.
[40] Hammel E.A., 1990, A theory of culture for demography, “Population and Development Review” nr 3, 455–485.
[41] Hammel E.A., Friou D.S., 1997, Anthropology and demography: marriage, liaison, or encounter?, [w:] Anthropological demography. Toward a new synthesis, red. D.I., Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago-London, 175–200.
[42] Haraway D., 1988, Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, „Feminist Studies” 14, nr 3, 575–599.
[43] Heer D.M., 2005, Kingsley Davis: A Biography and Selections from His Writings, New Brunswicks.
[44] Hodgson D., 1983, Demography as social science and policy science, „Population and Development Review” 9, nr 1, 1–34.
[45] Horton H.D., 1999, Critical demography: the paradigm of the future?, „Sociological Forum” 14, nr 3, 363–367.
[46] Keyfitz N., Caswell H., 2005, Applied mathematical demography, New York (3rd edition).
[47] Kirk D., 1968, The field of demography, [w:] International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, t. 12, red. D.L. Sills, New York, 342–348.
[48] Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, red E. Messer-Davidow, D.R. Shumway, D.J. Sylvan, 1993, Charlottesville.
[49] Kuhn T.S., 2001, Struktura rewolucji naukowych (przekł. Heleny Ostromęckiej), Warszawa.
[50] Kurkiewicz J., 1997, Rozważania o demografii w kontekście półwiecza badań ludnościowych we Francji, „Studia Demograficzne” 127, 1997, nr 1.
[51] Lakatos I., 1970, Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs, [w:] Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, red. I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave, London, 132–138.
[52] Lee R., 1997, History of demography in the U.S. since 1945, [w:] Le contours de la Démographie au seuil du XXIe siècle, red. J.-C. Chasteland, L. Rousel, Paris, 31–55.
[53] Lesthaeghe R., 1983, A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: an exploration of underlying dimensions, „Population and Development Review” 9, nr 3, 411–435.
[54] Lesthaeghe R., 1992, Beyond economic reductionism: the transformation of the reproductive regimes in France and Belgium in the 18th and 19th centuries, [w:] Family Structure and Population Policy, red. C. Goldscheider, Boulder, 1–44.
[55] Lesthaeghe R., 1998, On theory development: applications to the study of family formation, „Population and Development Review” 24, nr 1, 1–14.
[56] Lesthaeghe R., van de Kaa D.J., 1986, Twee demografische transities?, [w:] Bevolking — Groei en Krimp, Mens en Maatschappij, red. R. Lesthaeghe, D.J. van de Kaa, 9–24.
[57] Lorimer F., 1954, Culture and human fertility. A study of the relation of cultural conditions to fertility in non-industrial and transitional societies, UNESCO.
[58] Mackinnon A., Petersen-Gray J., 2005, „But I’m so embarrassed, I said, if it’s another baby!” Girls, schooling, and declining fertility in late 19th and early 20th century South Australia, referat wygłoszony na konferencji „Were women present at the demographic transition?”, Radbound University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 20–21 May.
[59] Marcus G., Fischer M., 1986, Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, Chicago.
[60] Martin E., 1995, From reproduction to HIV: blurring categories, shifting positions, [w:] Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, F.D. Ginsburg, R. Rapp, Berkeley, 256–269.
[61] McCloskey D., 1985, The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison.
[62] McCloskey D., 1985, The Applied Theory of Price, 2nd edition, New York.
[63] McIntosh A.C., Finkle J.L., 1995, The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: a new paradigm?, „Population and Development Review” 21, nr 2, 223–260.
[64] McIntyre A., 1980, Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative, and the philosophy of science, [w:] Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, red. G. Gutting, Notre Dame, 54–74.
[65] MacIntyre A., 1988, Whose Justice? Whose Rationality?, Notre Dame.
[66] McNicoll G., 1980, Institutional determinants of fertility change, „Population and Development Review” 6, nr 3, 441–462.
[67] McNicoll G., 1989, Concepts and frameworks needed for a better understanding of sociodemographic processes, [w:] International Population Conference, New Delhi 1989, 20–27 September, Liege (International Union for the Scientific Study of Population), 423–436.
[68] McNicoll G., 1992, Agenda of population studies: a commentary and complaint, „Population and Development Review” 18, nr 3, 399–420.
[69] Micro-approaches to Demographic Research, red. J.C. Caldwell, A.G. Hill, V.J. Hull, 1988, London, New York.
[70] Okólski M., 2005 Demografia. Podstawowe pojęcia procesy i teorie w encyklopedycznym zarysie, Warszawa.
[71] O’Neil J.D., Leyland-Kaufert P., 1995, Irniktakpunga! Sex determination and the Inuit struggle for birthing rights in northern Canada, [w:] Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, F.D. Ginsburg, R. Rapp, Berkeley, 59–73.
[72] Pahre R., Dogan M., 1989, The fragmentation and recombination of the social sciences, „Studies in International Comparative Development” 24, nr 2, 1–18.
[73] Palloni A., 2001, Diffusion in sociological analysis: how useful is it for the study of fertility and mortality?, [w:] Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition, red. J.B. Casterline, Washington, 66–114.
[74] Petersen W., 1983, Thoughts on writing a dictionary of demography, „Population and Development Review” 9, nr 4, 677–687.
[75] Pomorski J., 1985, Paradygmat „New Economic History”. Studium z teorii rozwoju nauki historycznej, Lublin.
[76] Popper K.R., 1965, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York.
[77] Population, Land Use, and Environment: research directions, red. B. Entwisle, P.C. Stern, 2005 Washington.
[78] Postmodernism and Anthropology: Theory and Practice, red. K. Geuijen, D. Raven, J.de Wolf, 1995, Assen.
[79] Postmodernism and Social Inquiry, red. D.R. Dickens, A. Fontana, 1994, New York.
[80] Postmodernism and Social Theory. The Debate over General Theory, red. S. Seidman, D.G. Wagner, 1991, Oxford.
[81] Preston S., 1993, The contours of demography, „Demography” 30, nr 4, 593–606.
[82] Ragin C., 2000, Fuzzy-set Social Science, Chicago.
[83] Rao V., 1997, Can economics mediate the relationship between anthropology and demography?, „Population and Development Review” 23, nr 4, 833–838.
[84] Rao V., 1998, Domestic violence and intra-household resource allocation in rural India: an exercise in participatory econometrics, [w:] Gender, Population, and Development, red. M. Krishnaraj, R Sudarshan, A. Sharif, Oxford, 94–121.
[85] Rao V., Woolcock M., 2004, Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in program evaluation, [w:] The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution: Evaluation Techniques and Tools, red. F. Bourguignon, L.A. Pereira da Silva, Oxford, 165–190.
[86] Riley N., 1998, Research on gender in demography: limitations and constraints, „Population Research and Policy Review” 17, 521–538.
[87] Riley N., 1999, Challenging demography: contribution from feminist theory, „Sociological Forum” 14, nr 3, 369–371.
[88] Ritzer G., 1975, Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science, Boston.
[89] Rosenau P., 1992, Postmodernism and the Social Sciences, Princeton.
[90] Roth E.A., 2004, Culture, Biology, and Anthropological Demography, Cambridge.
[91] Roussel L., Chasteland J.-C., 1996, Un demi-siecle de demographie dans le pays industriels. Quelques reflexions sur un bilan, „Population (French Edition)” 51, nr 2, 417–437.
[92] Rubin V., 1979, Steven Polgar, 1931–1978, „American Anthropologist. New Series” 81, nr 1, 79–84.
[93] Ruccio D.F., Amariglio J., 2003, Postmodern Moments in Modern Economics, Princeton.
[94] Said E., 1991, Orientalizm, Warszawa.
[95] Stycos J.M., 1955, Family and Fertility in Puerto Rico, New York.
[96] Stycos J.M., 1987, Demography as an interdiscipline, „Sociological Forum” 2, nr 4, 616–618.
[97] Szacki J., 2002, Historia myśli socjologicznej, Warszawa.
[98] Szołtysek M., 2002, Od strategii przetrwania do międzypokoleniowej wymiany – perspektywa antropologiczna w badaniach nad rodziną, gospodarstwem i pokrewieństwem, „Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski” 23, 143–165.
[99] Szołtysek M., 2003, Demografia historyczna i co dalej? Nowe perspektywy w badaniach nad historią rodziny XVI–XIX wieku, „Roczniki Dziejów Społecznych i Gospodarczych” 63, 119–143.
[100] Szołtysek M., 2005a, Czy antropologia „odkupi” demografię?; recenzja z Anthropological demography. Toward a new synthesis, red. D.I. Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago-London, 1997, „Historyka. Studia metodologiczne” 35, 35-49.
[101] Szołtysek M., 2005b, Rozrodczość w perspektywie ekonomicznej i demografia przeszłości, „Roczniki Dziejów Społecznych i Gospodarczych” 65, 25–52.
[102] Szołtysek M., 2006a, Antropologiczna demografia, demograficzna antropologia — w stronę hybrydalnych obszarów badawczych; uwagi w związku z pracą The methods and uses of anthropological demography, red. A.M. Basu, P. Aaby, Oxford 1998, „Lud” 90, (w druku).
[103] Szołtysek M., 2006b, Dowody i refutacje: wczoraj i dziś w historyczno-demograficznych studiach nad transformacją postaw prokreacyjnych, (w niniejszym tomie).
[104] Szreter S., 1993, The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: a critical intellectual history, ,,Population and Development Review” 19, nr 4, 659–702.
[105] Teitelbaum M.S., Winter J.M., 1985, The Fear of Population Decline, London.
[106] The Decline of Fertility in Europe, red. A.J. Coale, S.C. Watkins, 1986, Princeton.
[107] The Methods and Uses of Anthropological Demography, red. A.M. Basu, P. Aaby, 1998, Oxford.
[108] The Postmodern Turn. New Perspectives on Social Theory, red. S. Seidman, 1994, Cambridge.
[109] Thornton A., 2005, Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life, Chicago.
[110] Van Dalen H.P., Henkens K., 1999, How influential are demography journals?, „Population and Development Review” 25, nr 2, 229–251.
[111] Van de Kaa D.J., 1996, Anchored narratives: the story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility, „Population Studies” 50, nr 3, 389–432.
[112] Van de Kaa D.J., 2001, Postmodern fertility preferences: from changing value orientation to new behavior, „Population and Development Review” 27(Supplement: Global fertility transition), 290–331.
[113] Wallerstein I., 1991, Unthinking Social Science. The Limits of Nineteenth-century Paradigms, Oxford.
[114] Willekens F.J., 1997, Curriculum needs: perspectives from Europe, [w:] Defining a New Demography: Curriculum Needs for the 1990’s and Beyond, red. D.J. Bogue, Chicago, 1–10.
[115] Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, red. J. Clifford, G. Marcus, 1986, Berkeley.
[2] Alexander J., 1991, General theory in the postpositivist mode: the „epistemological dilemma” and the search for present reason, [w:] Postmodernism and Social Theory. The Debate over General Theory, red. S. Seidmand, D.G Wagner, Oxford, 326–368.
[3] Alway J., 1995, The trouble with gender: tales of the still-missing feminist revolution in sociological theory, „Sociological Theory” 13, nr 3, 209–228.
[4] Becker G.S., 1990, Ekonomiczna teoria rozrodczości, [w:] Becker G.S., Ekonomiczna teoria zachowań ludzkich, Warszawa, 297–333.
[5] Best S., Kellner D., 1997, The Postmodern Turn, New York.
[6] Blake J., 1961, Family Structure in Jamaica. The Social Context of Reproduction (współpraca J.M. Stycos i K. Davis), New York.
[7] Blake J., Davis K., 1963, Population and public opinion: the need for basic research, „American Behavioral Scientist” 6, nr 9, 24–29.
[8] Blake J., 1964, Issues in the training and recruitment of demographers, „Demography” 1, 258–63.
[9] Bogue D.J., 1997, Preface, [w:] Defining A new Demography: Curriculum Needs for the 1990’s and Beyond, red. D.J. Bogue, Chicago, s. i-vi.
[10] Bourque L.B., 1995, A biographical essay on Judith Blake’s professional career and scholarship, „Annual Review of Sociology” 21, 449–477.
[11] Brown S., 1995, Postmodern Marketing, London.
[12] Bryman A., 1988, Quantity and Quality in Social Research, London.
[13] Burch T.K., 2000, Explaining human fertility: one theory or many theories?, Discussion Paper 00–3, Population Studies Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
[14] Burch T.K., 2003, Demography in a new key: a theory of population theory, „Demographic Research” 9 (www.demographic–research.org), 264–284.
[15] Caldwell J.C., 1996, Demography and social science, „Population Studies” 50, nr 3, 305–333.
[16] Caldwell J.C., 2000, Demography: scope, perspectives, theory, Working Paper, Health Transition Centre and National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra.
[17] Caldwell J.C., Caldwell P., Orubuloye I., 1998, Methodological advances in studying the social context of AIDS in West Africa, [w:] The Methods and Uses of Anthropological Demography, red. A.M. Basu, P. Aaby, Oxford.
[18] Categories and Contexts. Anthropological and Hhistorical Studies in Critical Demography, red. S. Szreter, H. Sholkamy, A. Dharmalingam, Oxford 2004.
[19] Census and Identity. The Politics of Race, Ethnicity and Language in National Censuses, red. D.I. Kertzr, D. Ariel, Cambridge 2002.
[20] Chakrabarty D., 2003, Postkolonialność a podstęp historii: kto wypowiada się w imieniu przeszłości Indii?, przeł. D. Vogel, „Konteksty. Polska Sztuka Ludowa” 2003, nr 3–4, 117–132.
[21] Coale A.J., 1973, The demographic transition reconsidered, [w:] International Population Conference, Liege, 1973, Liege, t. 1, 53–72.
[22] Coale A.J., Hoover E.M., 1958, Population Growth and Economic Development in Low-income Countries: A Case Study of India’s Prospects, Princeton.
[23] Conceiving the New World order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, F.D. Ginsburg, R. Rapp, Berkeley 1995.
[24] Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, red. I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave, 1970, London.
[25] David P.A., Mroz T.A., Wachter K.W., 1985, Rational Sstrategies of Birth-spacing and Fertility Regulation in Rural France During the Ancien Regime, Stanford Profect for the History of Fertility Control, Working Paper no. 14, March.
[26] Davis K., 1980, A Structural Analysis of Kinship: Prolegomena to The Sociology of Kinship, New York.
[27] Davis K., Blake J., 1956, Social structure and fertility: an analytic framework, „Economic Development and Cultural Change” 4, nr 3, 211–235.
[28] Dogan M., Pahre R., 1990, Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Boulder.
[29] Domańska E., 1998, Encounters: Philosophy of History after Postmodernism, Charlottesville.
[30] Donaldson P.J., 2001, Using photographs to strengthen family planning research, „International Family Planning Perspectives” 27, nr 3, 176–179.
[31] Eckberg D.L., Hill L., Jr., 1980, The paradigm concept and sociology: a critical review, [w:] Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, red. G. Gutting, Notre Dame, 117–136.
[32] Foucault M., 1973, The Order of Things. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York.
[33] Frątczak E., Gach-Ciepiela U., Babiker H., 2005, Analiza historii zdarzeń. Elementy teorii, wybrane przykłady zastosowań, Warszawa.
[34] Freedman R., 1961–1962, The sociology of human fertility: a trend report and bibliography, „Current Sociology” 10/11, nr 2, 35–119.
[35] Fricke T., 1997, Culture theory and demographic process: toward a thicker demography, [w:] Anthropological Demography. Toward a New Synthesis, red. D.I., Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago-London, 48.
[36] Fricke T., Axinn W.G., Thornton A., 1993, Marriage, social inequality, and women’s contact with their natal families in alliance societies – two Tamang examples, „American Anthropologist” 95, nr 2, 395–419.
[37] Fuchs S., Ward S., 1994, What is deconstruction, and where and when does it take place? Making facts in science, building cases in law, „American Sociological Review” 59, nr 4, 481–500.
[38] Greenhalgh S., 1996, The social construction of population science: an intellectual, institutional, and political history of twentieth-century demography, „Comparative Studies in Society and History” 38, 26–66.
[39] Greenhalgh S., 1997, Methods and meanings: reflections on disciplinary difference, „Population and Development Review” 23, nr 4, 819–824.
[40] Hammel E.A., 1990, A theory of culture for demography, “Population and Development Review” nr 3, 455–485.
[41] Hammel E.A., Friou D.S., 1997, Anthropology and demography: marriage, liaison, or encounter?, [w:] Anthropological demography. Toward a new synthesis, red. D.I., Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago-London, 175–200.
[42] Haraway D., 1988, Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, „Feminist Studies” 14, nr 3, 575–599.
[43] Heer D.M., 2005, Kingsley Davis: A Biography and Selections from His Writings, New Brunswicks.
[44] Hodgson D., 1983, Demography as social science and policy science, „Population and Development Review” 9, nr 1, 1–34.
[45] Horton H.D., 1999, Critical demography: the paradigm of the future?, „Sociological Forum” 14, nr 3, 363–367.
[46] Keyfitz N., Caswell H., 2005, Applied mathematical demography, New York (3rd edition).
[47] Kirk D., 1968, The field of demography, [w:] International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, t. 12, red. D.L. Sills, New York, 342–348.
[48] Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity, red E. Messer-Davidow, D.R. Shumway, D.J. Sylvan, 1993, Charlottesville.
[49] Kuhn T.S., 2001, Struktura rewolucji naukowych (przekł. Heleny Ostromęckiej), Warszawa.
[50] Kurkiewicz J., 1997, Rozważania o demografii w kontekście półwiecza badań ludnościowych we Francji, „Studia Demograficzne” 127, 1997, nr 1.
[51] Lakatos I., 1970, Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs, [w:] Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, red. I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave, London, 132–138.
[52] Lee R., 1997, History of demography in the U.S. since 1945, [w:] Le contours de la Démographie au seuil du XXIe siècle, red. J.-C. Chasteland, L. Rousel, Paris, 31–55.
[53] Lesthaeghe R., 1983, A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: an exploration of underlying dimensions, „Population and Development Review” 9, nr 3, 411–435.
[54] Lesthaeghe R., 1992, Beyond economic reductionism: the transformation of the reproductive regimes in France and Belgium in the 18th and 19th centuries, [w:] Family Structure and Population Policy, red. C. Goldscheider, Boulder, 1–44.
[55] Lesthaeghe R., 1998, On theory development: applications to the study of family formation, „Population and Development Review” 24, nr 1, 1–14.
[56] Lesthaeghe R., van de Kaa D.J., 1986, Twee demografische transities?, [w:] Bevolking — Groei en Krimp, Mens en Maatschappij, red. R. Lesthaeghe, D.J. van de Kaa, 9–24.
[57] Lorimer F., 1954, Culture and human fertility. A study of the relation of cultural conditions to fertility in non-industrial and transitional societies, UNESCO.
[58] Mackinnon A., Petersen-Gray J., 2005, „But I’m so embarrassed, I said, if it’s another baby!” Girls, schooling, and declining fertility in late 19th and early 20th century South Australia, referat wygłoszony na konferencji „Were women present at the demographic transition?”, Radbound University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 20–21 May.
[59] Marcus G., Fischer M., 1986, Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences, Chicago.
[60] Martin E., 1995, From reproduction to HIV: blurring categories, shifting positions, [w:] Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, F.D. Ginsburg, R. Rapp, Berkeley, 256–269.
[61] McCloskey D., 1985, The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison.
[62] McCloskey D., 1985, The Applied Theory of Price, 2nd edition, New York.
[63] McIntosh A.C., Finkle J.L., 1995, The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: a new paradigm?, „Population and Development Review” 21, nr 2, 223–260.
[64] McIntyre A., 1980, Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative, and the philosophy of science, [w:] Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, red. G. Gutting, Notre Dame, 54–74.
[65] MacIntyre A., 1988, Whose Justice? Whose Rationality?, Notre Dame.
[66] McNicoll G., 1980, Institutional determinants of fertility change, „Population and Development Review” 6, nr 3, 441–462.
[67] McNicoll G., 1989, Concepts and frameworks needed for a better understanding of sociodemographic processes, [w:] International Population Conference, New Delhi 1989, 20–27 September, Liege (International Union for the Scientific Study of Population), 423–436.
[68] McNicoll G., 1992, Agenda of population studies: a commentary and complaint, „Population and Development Review” 18, nr 3, 399–420.
[69] Micro-approaches to Demographic Research, red. J.C. Caldwell, A.G. Hill, V.J. Hull, 1988, London, New York.
[70] Okólski M., 2005 Demografia. Podstawowe pojęcia procesy i teorie w encyklopedycznym zarysie, Warszawa.
[71] O’Neil J.D., Leyland-Kaufert P., 1995, Irniktakpunga! Sex determination and the Inuit struggle for birthing rights in northern Canada, [w:] Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, F.D. Ginsburg, R. Rapp, Berkeley, 59–73.
[72] Pahre R., Dogan M., 1989, The fragmentation and recombination of the social sciences, „Studies in International Comparative Development” 24, nr 2, 1–18.
[73] Palloni A., 2001, Diffusion in sociological analysis: how useful is it for the study of fertility and mortality?, [w:] Diffusion Processes and Fertility Transition, red. J.B. Casterline, Washington, 66–114.
[74] Petersen W., 1983, Thoughts on writing a dictionary of demography, „Population and Development Review” 9, nr 4, 677–687.
[75] Pomorski J., 1985, Paradygmat „New Economic History”. Studium z teorii rozwoju nauki historycznej, Lublin.
[76] Popper K.R., 1965, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York.
[77] Population, Land Use, and Environment: research directions, red. B. Entwisle, P.C. Stern, 2005 Washington.
[78] Postmodernism and Anthropology: Theory and Practice, red. K. Geuijen, D. Raven, J.de Wolf, 1995, Assen.
[79] Postmodernism and Social Inquiry, red. D.R. Dickens, A. Fontana, 1994, New York.
[80] Postmodernism and Social Theory. The Debate over General Theory, red. S. Seidman, D.G. Wagner, 1991, Oxford.
[81] Preston S., 1993, The contours of demography, „Demography” 30, nr 4, 593–606.
[82] Ragin C., 2000, Fuzzy-set Social Science, Chicago.
[83] Rao V., 1997, Can economics mediate the relationship between anthropology and demography?, „Population and Development Review” 23, nr 4, 833–838.
[84] Rao V., 1998, Domestic violence and intra-household resource allocation in rural India: an exercise in participatory econometrics, [w:] Gender, Population, and Development, red. M. Krishnaraj, R Sudarshan, A. Sharif, Oxford, 94–121.
[85] Rao V., Woolcock M., 2004, Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in program evaluation, [w:] The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution: Evaluation Techniques and Tools, red. F. Bourguignon, L.A. Pereira da Silva, Oxford, 165–190.
[86] Riley N., 1998, Research on gender in demography: limitations and constraints, „Population Research and Policy Review” 17, 521–538.
[87] Riley N., 1999, Challenging demography: contribution from feminist theory, „Sociological Forum” 14, nr 3, 369–371.
[88] Ritzer G., 1975, Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science, Boston.
[89] Rosenau P., 1992, Postmodernism and the Social Sciences, Princeton.
[90] Roth E.A., 2004, Culture, Biology, and Anthropological Demography, Cambridge.
[91] Roussel L., Chasteland J.-C., 1996, Un demi-siecle de demographie dans le pays industriels. Quelques reflexions sur un bilan, „Population (French Edition)” 51, nr 2, 417–437.
[92] Rubin V., 1979, Steven Polgar, 1931–1978, „American Anthropologist. New Series” 81, nr 1, 79–84.
[93] Ruccio D.F., Amariglio J., 2003, Postmodern Moments in Modern Economics, Princeton.
[94] Said E., 1991, Orientalizm, Warszawa.
[95] Stycos J.M., 1955, Family and Fertility in Puerto Rico, New York.
[96] Stycos J.M., 1987, Demography as an interdiscipline, „Sociological Forum” 2, nr 4, 616–618.
[97] Szacki J., 2002, Historia myśli socjologicznej, Warszawa.
[98] Szołtysek M., 2002, Od strategii przetrwania do międzypokoleniowej wymiany – perspektywa antropologiczna w badaniach nad rodziną, gospodarstwem i pokrewieństwem, „Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski” 23, 143–165.
[99] Szołtysek M., 2003, Demografia historyczna i co dalej? Nowe perspektywy w badaniach nad historią rodziny XVI–XIX wieku, „Roczniki Dziejów Społecznych i Gospodarczych” 63, 119–143.
[100] Szołtysek M., 2005a, Czy antropologia „odkupi” demografię?; recenzja z Anthropological demography. Toward a new synthesis, red. D.I. Kertzer, T. Fricke, Chicago-London, 1997, „Historyka. Studia metodologiczne” 35, 35-49.
[101] Szołtysek M., 2005b, Rozrodczość w perspektywie ekonomicznej i demografia przeszłości, „Roczniki Dziejów Społecznych i Gospodarczych” 65, 25–52.
[102] Szołtysek M., 2006a, Antropologiczna demografia, demograficzna antropologia — w stronę hybrydalnych obszarów badawczych; uwagi w związku z pracą The methods and uses of anthropological demography, red. A.M. Basu, P. Aaby, Oxford 1998, „Lud” 90, (w druku).
[103] Szołtysek M., 2006b, Dowody i refutacje: wczoraj i dziś w historyczno-demograficznych studiach nad transformacją postaw prokreacyjnych, (w niniejszym tomie).
[104] Szreter S., 1993, The idea of demographic transition and the study of fertility change: a critical intellectual history, ,,Population and Development Review” 19, nr 4, 659–702.
[105] Teitelbaum M.S., Winter J.M., 1985, The Fear of Population Decline, London.
[106] The Decline of Fertility in Europe, red. A.J. Coale, S.C. Watkins, 1986, Princeton.
[107] The Methods and Uses of Anthropological Demography, red. A.M. Basu, P. Aaby, 1998, Oxford.
[108] The Postmodern Turn. New Perspectives on Social Theory, red. S. Seidman, 1994, Cambridge.
[109] Thornton A., 2005, Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life, Chicago.
[110] Van Dalen H.P., Henkens K., 1999, How influential are demography journals?, „Population and Development Review” 25, nr 2, 229–251.
[111] Van de Kaa D.J., 1996, Anchored narratives: the story and findings of half a century of research into the determinants of fertility, „Population Studies” 50, nr 3, 389–432.
[112] Van de Kaa D.J., 2001, Postmodern fertility preferences: from changing value orientation to new behavior, „Population and Development Review” 27(Supplement: Global fertility transition), 290–331.
[113] Wallerstein I., 1991, Unthinking Social Science. The Limits of Nineteenth-century Paradigms, Oxford.
[114] Willekens F.J., 1997, Curriculum needs: perspectives from Europe, [w:] Defining a New Demography: Curriculum Needs for the 1990’s and Beyond, red. D.J. Bogue, Chicago, 1–10.
[115] Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, red. J. Clifford, G. Marcus, 1986, Berkeley.