Cooperation between knowledge-based institutions and start-up companies in Poland: an overview of the theoretical bacground for analysing the ecosystems
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstrakt
Start-up companies constitute a very “representative” phenomenon of the global economy and are its special “product”, since they act mainly in the Internet-related and high-technology branches and they are usually seen as born globals. Thus, the type of their activity, implemented business models, products and services offered are “embedded” into the networks, i.e. not only of the local, but rather international and global markets. The same concerns the relations of those firms with other actors of the ecosystems, among others: institutions of science.
The problem of relations between start-ups (and business in general) and the knowledge-based institutions theoretically lies in the cross-section of different research domains and can be tackled from different perspectives and on various problematic levels. Taking such a multi-dimensional attitude in analysing the issue is consistent with the holistic approach in tackling and covering the various analytical problems of start-up ecosystems, commonly accepted in the literature (partly as an effect of a kind of consensus among the researchers).
Taking into consideration the richness of the aspects and sub-issues which should be analysed when studying the problem of the cooperation between start-up companies in Poland and knowledge-based institutions, the hereby paper implicitly prepares “the ground” for more detailed empirical studies basing on the overview of the chosen literature from the behavioural economy and social network theories. Then, there was the Polish ecosystem characterized with special attention put to the knowledge-based institution.
Downloads
Article Details
Autor (Autorzy) artykułu oświadcza, że przesłane opracowanie nie narusza praw autorskich osób trzecich. Wyraża zgodę na poddanie artykułu procedurze recenzji oraz dokonanie zmian redakcyjnych. Przenosi nieodpłatnie na Oficynę Wydawniczą SGH autorskie prawa majątkowe do utworu na polach eksploatacji wymienionych w art. 50 Ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych – pod warunkiem, że praca została zaakceptowana do publikacji i opublikowana.
Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH posiada autorskie prawa majątkowe do wszystkich treści czasopisma. Zamieszczenie tekstu artykuły w repozytorium, na stronie domowej autora lub na innej stronie jest dozwolone o ile nie wiąże się z pozyskiwaniem korzyści majątkowych, a tekst wyposażony będzie w informacje źródłowe (w tym również tytuł, rok, numer i adres internetowy czasopisma).
Osoby zainteresowane komercyjnym wykorzystaniem zawartości czasopisma proszone są o kontakt z Redakcją.
Bibliografia
2. Aldrich H., Zimmer C., Entrepreneurship through social networks, [in:] D. Sexton, R. Smiler
3. (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship, Ballinger, New York 1986, pp. 3–23.
4. Aldrich H. E., Rosen B., Woodward W., The impact of social networks on business
5. foundlings and profit: A longitudinal study, [in:] N. Churchill, J. Hornaday, O. J. Krasner, K. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, Babson College, Wellesley 1987, pp.154–168.
6. Almeida P., Kogut B., The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: Start-up firms in the semiconductor industry, “Small Business Economics” February 1997, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, pp. 21–31.
7. Balconi M., Breschi S., Lissoni F., Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An
8. exploration of Italian patent data, “Research Policy” 2004, No. 33 (1), pp. 127–145.
9. Barney D. D., The network society, Polity, Cambridge, UK 2004.
10. Birley S., The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process, “Journal of Business Venturing” 1985, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. 107–117.
11. Burgel O., The International Market Entry Choices of Start-Up Companies in High-Technology Industries, Foundation for Entrepreneurial Management, London Business School, London 2000.
12. Benkler Y., The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn. 2006.
13. Bechky B., Shared meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of knowledge of a production floor, “Organizational Sciences” 2003, No. 14, pp. 312–330.
14. Castells M., The rise of the network society, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford 2000.
15. Chesbrough H. W., Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from
16. Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass. 2003.
17. Chesbrough H. W., Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 2011.
18. Coleman J. S., Social capital in the creation of human capital, “The American Journal of Sociology” 1988, No. 94, pp. 95–120.
19. Doutriaux J., Emerging high-tech firms: How durable are their comparative start-up advantages?
20. “Journal of Business Venturing” July 1992, Vol. 7, Iss. 4, pp. 303–322.
21. Gans J. G., Hsu D. H., Stern S., When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? NBER Working Paper 2000, No. 7851.
22. Florida R. L., The rise of the creative class: And how its transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, Basic Books, New York 2002.
23. Florida R. L., Cities and the creative class, Routledge, New York 2005.
24. Gatewood E. J, Shaver K. G., Gartner W. B., A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start- up behaviors and success at venture creation, “Journal of Business Venturing” September 1995, Vol. 10, Iss. 5, pp. 371–391.
25. Görg H., Strobl E., Ruane F., Determinants of Firm Start-Up Size: An Application of Quantile
26. Regression for Ireland, “Small Business Economics” 2000, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, pp. 211–222.
27. Granovetter M., The strength of weak ties, “The American Journal of Sociology” 1373, No. 76 (6), pp. 1360–1381.
28. Hagedoorn J., Schakenraad J., Leading companies and networks of strategic alliances in information technologies, “Research Policy” 1992, No. 21, pp. 163–190.
29. Hayter Ch. S., Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: perspectives from the
30. literature, “Small Business Economics” 2013, No. 41, pp. 899–911.
31. Hoang H., Antoncic B. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review, “Journal of Business Venturing” 2003, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 165–187.
32. Holger G., Strobl E., Ruane F., Determinants of Firm Start-Up Size: An Application of Quantile Regression for Ireland, “Small Business Economics” May 2000, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, pp 211–222.
33. Huyghebaert N., Gaeremynck A., Roodhooft F., Van de Gucht L. M., New Firm Survival. The Effects of Start-up Characteristics, “Journal of Business Finance & Accounting” 2000, No. 27 (5–6), pp. 627–651.
34. Jack S. L., Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes, “Journal of Business Venturing” 2010, No. 25 (1), pp. 130–137.
35. Knoke D., Yang S., Social network analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA, 2008.
36. Landry C., & Comedia (Firm), The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators. Earthscan Publications, London 2000.
37. Lechner C., Dowling M., Welpe I., Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix, “Journal of Business Venturing” 2006, No. 21 (4), pp. 514–540.
38. Mata J., Portugal P., Guimarães P., The Post-Entry Performance of Firms, The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution, “International Journal of Industrial Organization” December 1995, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, pp. 459–481.
39. Reid G. C., Smith J. A., What makes a New Business Start-Up Successful? “Small Business Economics” May 2000, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, pp. 165–182.
40. Rifkin J., The age of access: The new culture of hypercapitalism, where all of life is a paidfor experience, J. P. Tarcher/Putn, New York 2000.
41. Rifkin J., The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2011.
42. Rifkin J., The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2014.
43. Robinson W. T., Product Innovation and Start-Up Business Market Share Performance, School of Business Administration, University of Michigan 1990.
44. Roszkowska-Menkes M., Karpacz J., Otwarte innowacje: w poszukiwaniu równowagi. Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2015.
45. Santarelli E., Piergiovanni R., The determinants of firm start-up and entry in Italian producer services, “Small Business Economics” June 1995, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, pp. 221–230.
46. Tapscott D., The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York 1996.
47. Tapscott D., Williams A. D., MacroWikinomics: rebooting business and the world, Portfolio Penguin, New York 2010.
48. Tapscott D., Williams A. D., Wikinomics, Penguin Group, New York 2006.
49. Terpstra D. E., Olson P. D., Entrepreneurial start-up and growth: a classification of problems, “Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice” April 1993.
50. Toffler A., The third wave, Bantam Books, New York 1981.
51. Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W., Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network, “Organization Science” 1997, No. 8 (2), pp. 109–125.
52. van Dijk, J., The Network Society. Social Aspects of New Media. SAGE Publications, London 1999.
53. Wright M., Clarysse B., Mustar P., Lockett A., Academic entrepreneurship in Europe, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton MA 2007.
54. Zimmer C., Alrich H., Resource mobilization through ethnic networks: Kinship and friendhip ties of shopkeepers in England, “Sociological Perspective” 1987, No. 30, pp. 422–445.
Documents
1. COM/2011/0808 Horizon 2020 – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation – Communication from the Commission.
2. COM/2011/0822 Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Strategic Innovation Agenda of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT): the contribution of the EIT to a more innovative Europe.
3. SEC (2011) 1427 final Commission Staff Working Paper Impact Assessment – The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation; Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020).
4. Strategia Rozwoju Kraju 2020, Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego RP, September 2012.
5. Polska. 2030 Trzecia fala nowoczesności, Ministerstwo Administracji i Cyfryzacji.
Websites
1. www.ncbr.gov.pl
2. www.parp.gov.pl