Impact of host countries' environmental regulations along the Belt and Road Initiative on China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstrakt
This paper makes use of the panel data of China's direct investment in 61 countries along the ‘Belt and Road' from 2006 to 2016. Using the investment gravity model, we first carry out the total data regression, then the sample data regression based on the national income, the environmental reg- ulation intensity and the district position. The study found that, as far as the overall sample is con- cerned, the national environmental regulation along the ‘Belt and Road' has a significant inhibitory effect on China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment (OFDI), and the countries along the line are grouped according to income levels. Environmental regulations vary according to the differences in national income levels: environmental regulations in high income and intermediate-high income countries have a notable negative correlation with the OFDI of China, while environmental regula- tions in low-and middle-income countries have no significant impact on China's OFDI. According to the intensity of environmental regulation, the countries along the ‘Belt and Road' are grouped. The empirical results show that China's OFDI was significantly inhibited by countries whose national environmental regulations are higher than the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), while China's OFDI was not affected by the countries whose national environmental regulations are lower than the EPI. According to the different regional groupings of the host country, it was found that the environmental regulations of European countries and West Asian countries significantly inhibited China's OFDI, while the environmental regulations of the Middle East and North Africa and East Asian countries had no significant impact on China's OFDI.
Some other important factors affecting China's OFDI should be taken into consideration, includ- ing the scale of the economy in the investment home country, the host country's economic level, strategic resources, infrastructure, government regulation, and bilateral trade tightness. Except for the government regulation level, which has an inhibitory effect on China's OFDI, the others have a strong promoting effect. This is consistent with the conclusions drawn by Qiu Qiang [2018]. The role of natural resources is not significant, indicating that China has insufficient incentives to natural resources along the ‘Belt and Road' countries.
Finally, from the perspective of the government and enterprises, policy recommendations are pro- posed relevant to China's OFDI along the ‘Belt and Road'. The government should actively collect the measurement data of the host country's environmental regulations, carry out investment grading according to the strength of the environmental regulations and formulate different investment strat- egies accordingly. Chinese companies must pay attention to technology and innovation capabilities, which is conducive to reducing the extrusion of OFDI with similar technology levels.
Downloads
Article Details
Bibliografia
2. Chen Xuan, Wu Ge (2010). Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Regulation on FDI - An Empirical Analysis Based on Guangdong. Special Economic Zone, No. 4, pp. 32-34.
3. Chung, S.H. (2014). Environment Regulation and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from South Korea. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 108, No. 5, pp. 222-236.
4. Debashis Chakrabortya, Sacchidananda Mukherjeeb (2013). How do trade and investment flows affect environmental sustainability? Evidence from Panel Data. Environmental Development, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 34-47.
5. Deng, P. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment by Transnational from Emerging Countries: The Case of China. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, No. 10(2), pp. 113-124.
6. Dunning, J.H. (1977). Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNE: A Search for an Eclectic Approach. [In:] The International Allocation of Economic Activity. B. Ohlin, P. O. Hes- selborn, and P.M. Wijkman (Eds.). London: MacMillan, pp. 395-418.
7. Fu Jingyan, Li Lisha (2010). Empirical Research on Environmental Regulation, Factor Endow- ment and Industrial International Competitiveness. Management World, No. 10, pp. 87-98.
8. Gao Jing, Liu Guoguang (2011). The Research on FDI District Agglomeration of Multinational Producer Services. Economy and Management, Vol.25; No. 20910, pp. 76-80.
9. Grossman, G. and Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper No. 3914.
10. Guo Jianwan, Tao Feng (2009). Agglomeration Economy, Environmental Regulation and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment - Based on the Analysis of New Economic Geography. Industrial Economics Research No. 4, pp. 29-37.
11. Haeyeon Yoon, Almas Heshmati (2017). Do environmental regulations effect FDI decisions? The pollution haven hypothesis revisited. IZA Institute of Labour Economics, IZA DP No.10897.pp. 1-21.
12. Henderson, J.V. (1996). Effects of Air Quality Regulation. American Economic Review No. 86 (4).
13. Hu Desheng, Ou Jun (2016). The Environmental Responsibility of Chinese Enterprises Directly Investing in Other Countries in the “Belt and Road”. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition), No. 04, pp. 45-51.
14. Javorcik, B.S., Spatareanu, M. (2005). Do Foreign Investor Care about Labor Market Regula- tion? Review of World Economics, Vol. 141, No. 3, pp. 375-403.
15. Jiang Guanhong, Jiang Dianchun (2012). Location Selection of China's Foreign Investment: Panel Data Inspection Based on Investment Gravity Mode. World Economy No. 9, pp. 21-40.
16. Jiang Dianchun, Zhang Qing Chang (2011). Analysis of the Gravity Model of American Direct Investment in China. The Journal of World Economy, No. 5, pp. 26-41.
17. Joanne E. Oxley (1999). Institutional Environment and the Mechanisms of Governance: The Impact of Intellectual Property Protection on the Structure of Inter-firm Alliances. Journal ofEconomic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 283-309.
18. Kellenberg D. (2009). An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. Journal of International Economics, No. 78 (2), pp. 242-255.
19. Keller, W. Levinson, A. (2002). Pollution Abatement Costs and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to US States. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 11, pp. 691-703.
20. Levinson A. (1996). Environmental regulations and manufacturers' location choices: Evidence from the Census of Manufactures. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 5-29.
21. Li Gang, Li Ying (2012). Theory and Empirical Progress of Environmental Regulation Intensity Measurement. Economic Management, No. 12, pp. 154-165.
22. Li Guoping,Yang Peigang, Song Wenfei, Han Xianfeng (2013). Environmental Regulation, FDI and “Pollution Shelter” Effect: An Empirical Analysis of the Heterogeneity Perspective of China's Industrial Sector. Science of Science and Management of S. & T, No. 10, pp. 122-129.
23. Liu Yang, Zhang Rui, Gao Yanhong (2014). Construction and Measurement of China's Environ- mental Regulation Performance Evaluation Index System. Business Times, No. 4, pp. 115-117.
24. Liu Zaiqi, Wang Yang (2016). Economic Resources, Institutional Environment and Location Choice of China's Direct Investment in the European Union. Economic Management, No. 02, pp. 1-13.
25. Meng Qingqiang (2016). An Empirical Study of China's Direct Investment Motivation in Countries along the Belt and Road Initiative. Industrial Economic Forum, No. 3(02), pp. 136-144
26. Millimet, D.L., Ray, J. (2016). Empirical Tests of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis When Envi- ronmental Regulation Is Endogenous. J. Appl. Econ., Vol. 31, pp. 652-677.
27. Ni Sha, Wang Yongxing, Jing Weimin (2016). Analysis of China's Gravity of Direct Investment in Countries along the Belt and Road Initiative. Modern Financial Economics, No. 5, pp. 3-14.
28. Oh, J.Y. (2014). The Effect of Environmental Regulation Stringency on the FDI of Korea's pollu- tion intensive industry [D]. Seoul National University,
29. Qiu Qiang, Wang Sai, Zhang Tongxun (2018a). Research on the Impact of Environmental Regu- lations in Asia-Pacific Countries on China's OFDI. Asia-Pacific Economy, No. 1, pp. 120-125.
30. Qiu Qiang, Zhang Tongxun, Wang Sai (2018b). Study on the Impact of Environmental Regulations of 16 Countries in Central and Eastern Europe on China's OFDI, China-Central and Eastern European Countries Cooperation Progress and Achievements. China Social Sciences Press, No. 9, pp. 93-111.
31. Ren Li, Huang Chongjie (2015). The Impact of Environmental Regulations at Home and Abroad on China's Export Trade. World Economy, No. 5, pp. 59-80.
32. Song Malin, Wang Shuhong (2013). Environmental Regulation, Technological Progress and Economic Growth. Economic Research, No. 3, pp. 122-134.
33. Su Hongyan, Li Jingmei (2017). An Empirical Study on the Spatial Layout and Pollution Transfer of FDI Countries along the Belt and Road Initiative. Soft Science, No. 3, pp. 25-29.
34. Susan F. Stone and Bang Nam Jeon (2000). Foreign Direct Investment and Trade in the Asia- pacific Region: Complementarity, Distance and Regional Economic Integration. Journal of Economic Integration, No. 3, Vol. 15, pp. 460-485
35. Tian Suhua, Yang Wei (2012). Determinants of FDI Entering China's Location Change: Empirical Research Based on D-G Model. World Economy, No. 11, pp. 59-87.
36. Tian Yuan, Li Jianjun (2018). China's Location Choice for OFDI along the “Belt and Road” Countries. Exploration of economics, No. 1, pp. 79-88.
37. UNCTAD (2006). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, UNCTAD annual report 2006, pp. 2-19. Retrieved from: https://unctad.org/ch/docs/dom20071_ch.pdf
38. Wagner, U., Timmins, C. (2009). Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, No. 43(2), pp. 231-256.
39. Walsh, J.P. and Yu Jiangyan (2010). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Sectoral and Institutional Approach. IMF Working Papers, Vol. 7, pp. 1-27.
40. Wang Sheng, Tian Tao (2013). Research on the Factors Affecting the Location Choice of China's Foreign Direct Investment - Based on the Perspective of Country Differences. World Economic Research, No. 12, pp. 60-66.
41. Wang Ying, Lu Wei, Tang Ziyi (2018). Research on the Factors Affecting China's Direct Invest- ment in the Countries Along the Belt and Road Initiative - Based on the Environmental Factors of Host Country System. International Trade Issues, No. 1, pp. 83-91.
42. Wang Yongqin, Du Juzhen, Wang Kai (2014). Determinants of China's Foreign Direct Invest- ment Location Selection: System, Tax Burden and Resource Endowment. Economic Research, No. 12, pp. 126-142
43. Xing Y.C.D. Kolstad (2002). Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1-22.
44. Xiong, B, Wang, M. (2018). Study on the Influencing Factors of Chinese OFDI in Countries along the “Belt and Road”: Based on Spatial Perspective. Journal of International Trade, No. 2, pp. 102-112.
45. Xu Qiqi (2015). Construction and Empirical Test of Mathematical Model of Green Technology Innovation under Environmental Regulation [D]. Jilin University.
46. Xu Xiaoping, Lu Jing, Li Jiang (2016). The Impact of Signing Bilateral Investment Agreements on China's OFDI - An Empirical Study Based on Countries along the Belt and Road Initiative. Industrial Technology & Economy, No. 5, pp. 60-64.
47. Zhao Yumin, Zhu Fangming, He Lilong (2009). Within the Definition, Classification and Evolution of Environmental Regulation. China Population, Resources and Environment, No. 6, pp. 85-90.
48. Zhou Wei, Chen Shao et al. (2017). China's National Risk Study of the “Belt and Road” OFDI: Based on the Quantitative Evaluation of 39 Host Countries along the Route. World Economic Research, No. 4, pp. 1-9.
49. Zhu Wei, Ren Rongming (2015). Export, Environmental Pollution and Foreign Direct Invest- ment - Based on the Empirical Test of China Provincial Panel VAR from 2003 to 2012. Ecology and Economy, No. 6, pp 36-40.
50. Zhushujin, Yinshixue (2014). Does Trade of Polluted Industries Lead to A “Race to the Bottom” in Environmental Regulation? Evidence from Cross-Country Panel Data. Industrial Economics Research, No. 4, pp. 41-51.