Implementation of the IMZD Approach (IMZD as the Integrative Maturity Capability Model) in the Performance of a New Product Process
Article Sidebar
Opublikowane:
lip 29, 2019
Słowa kluczowe:
maturity of the process, innovations, product
Main Article Content
Abstrakt
The publication sets out to propose a new research approach – one that could significantly improve the maturity measurement of product innovation processes in businesses. As detailed here, the concept for measuring the maturity of an innovation and new product marketing process reflects a specific research attitude towards new product development. Importantly, too, the concept sees those approaches as guiding and directing the studies into the matrix- and grid-based methods, which are developed using new analytical tools. What is presented here is an overview of methodologies with their relevant techniques and procedural algorithms (methodology in a pragmatic sense).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
Jak cytować
Bartkowiak, P., & Rutkowski, I. P. (2019). Implementation of the IMZD Approach (IMZD as the Integrative Maturity Capability Model) in the Performance of a New Product Process. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, (31), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.33119/JMFS.2018.31.10
Dział
Articles
Bibliografia
1. Bartkowiak P., 2004. Rozwój zrównoważony jako jeden z kierunków restrukturyzacji przedsiębiorstw użyteczności publicznej. Przegląd Organizacji, no 6, pp. 22–25.
2. Bartkowiak P., Rutkowski I. P., 2016. The role of information in product innovation process and assortment management. LogForum Scientific Journal of Logistics, vol. 12, (2), pp. 113–122.
3. Capability Maturity Model Integration for Development. August 2006, Version 1.2. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2006‑TR-008. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
4. Chrapko M., 2010. CMMI: Doskonalenie procesów w organizacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, p. 265.
5. Cooper R. G., Edgett S. J., 2013, Benchmarking Best Practices Performance Results and the Role of Senior Management, Product Development Institute Inc., http://www.stage-gate.com/downloads/wp/wp_32.pdf [access: 9.12.2017].
6. Cooper R. G., Edgett, S. J., 2008. Maximizing productivity in product innovation. Research Technology Management, March 1.
7. Cooper R. G., 1993. Winning at New Products, Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
8. Cooper R. G., 2002. Winning at New Products. Accelerating the Process from Idea to Lunch, ed. 3 Reading Mass.: Adddison-Wesley Publishing Company.
9. Crawford C. M., 1979. New product failure rates – Facts and Fallacies. Research Management, September, pp. 9–13.
10. Griffin A., 1997. PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 14 (6),
pp. 429–458.
11. Mu J., Ellen T., Gang P., Di Benedetto A., 2017. Strategic orientation and new product development
performance: The role of networking capability and networking ability. Industrial
Marketing Management, vol. 64, July, pp. 187–201.
12. Paulk M. C., Curtis B., Chrissis M. B., Weber C. C., 2011. Capability maturity model for software.
Software Engineering Institute Technical Report no. CMU/SEI-2011‑TR-24, sec. 2.3.
13. Pickshaus T., Kandt A., Hesse S., Fleischer K., Schmitt R., 2016. A Holistic Approach to Risk
Oriented Lifecycle Engineering: Assessing Lifecycle Risks in Early Phases. Procedia CIRP,
vol. 48, pp. 265–270.
14. Rutkowski I. P., 2016. Metody innowacji produktu. Macierzowo-sieciowe metody pomiaru
dojrzałości procesu innowacji produktu. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego
w Poznaniu, p. 215.
15. Rutkowski I. P., 2007. Rozwój nowego produktu. Metody i uwarunkowania. Warszawa: PWE,
pp. 77–92.
16. SCAMPI Upgrade Team. Appraisal Requirements for CMMI, 2011. Version 1.2 (ARC, V1.3)
(CMU/SEI-2011‑TR-001). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon
University, April.
17. Skrzypek E., Hofman M., 2010. Zarządzanie procesami w przedsiębiorstwie. Identyfikowanie,
pomiar, usprawnianie. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, pp. 37–46.
18. Stevens G. A. Burley J., 1997. 3000 raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success. Research Technology
Management, May-June, pp. 16–27.
19. The PDMA Glossary for New Product Development. Product Development & Management
Association 2012.
20. Trott P., 2011. Innovation Management and New Product Development, 5th ed. Harlow: Prentice
Hall, Pearson Education.
21. Walker R., 2013. Winning with Risk Management (Financial Engineering and Risk Management).
Hackensack, New York: World Scientific Publishing.
22. Wheelwright S. C., Clark C. B., 1992. Revolutionizing Product Development. New York: The
Free Press.
2. Bartkowiak P., Rutkowski I. P., 2016. The role of information in product innovation process and assortment management. LogForum Scientific Journal of Logistics, vol. 12, (2), pp. 113–122.
3. Capability Maturity Model Integration for Development. August 2006, Version 1.2. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2006‑TR-008. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
4. Chrapko M., 2010. CMMI: Doskonalenie procesów w organizacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, p. 265.
5. Cooper R. G., Edgett S. J., 2013, Benchmarking Best Practices Performance Results and the Role of Senior Management, Product Development Institute Inc., http://www.stage-gate.com/downloads/wp/wp_32.pdf [access: 9.12.2017].
6. Cooper R. G., Edgett, S. J., 2008. Maximizing productivity in product innovation. Research Technology Management, March 1.
7. Cooper R. G., 1993. Winning at New Products, Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
8. Cooper R. G., 2002. Winning at New Products. Accelerating the Process from Idea to Lunch, ed. 3 Reading Mass.: Adddison-Wesley Publishing Company.
9. Crawford C. M., 1979. New product failure rates – Facts and Fallacies. Research Management, September, pp. 9–13.
10. Griffin A., 1997. PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 14 (6),
pp. 429–458.
11. Mu J., Ellen T., Gang P., Di Benedetto A., 2017. Strategic orientation and new product development
performance: The role of networking capability and networking ability. Industrial
Marketing Management, vol. 64, July, pp. 187–201.
12. Paulk M. C., Curtis B., Chrissis M. B., Weber C. C., 2011. Capability maturity model for software.
Software Engineering Institute Technical Report no. CMU/SEI-2011‑TR-24, sec. 2.3.
13. Pickshaus T., Kandt A., Hesse S., Fleischer K., Schmitt R., 2016. A Holistic Approach to Risk
Oriented Lifecycle Engineering: Assessing Lifecycle Risks in Early Phases. Procedia CIRP,
vol. 48, pp. 265–270.
14. Rutkowski I. P., 2016. Metody innowacji produktu. Macierzowo-sieciowe metody pomiaru
dojrzałości procesu innowacji produktu. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego
w Poznaniu, p. 215.
15. Rutkowski I. P., 2007. Rozwój nowego produktu. Metody i uwarunkowania. Warszawa: PWE,
pp. 77–92.
16. SCAMPI Upgrade Team. Appraisal Requirements for CMMI, 2011. Version 1.2 (ARC, V1.3)
(CMU/SEI-2011‑TR-001). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon
University, April.
17. Skrzypek E., Hofman M., 2010. Zarządzanie procesami w przedsiębiorstwie. Identyfikowanie,
pomiar, usprawnianie. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, pp. 37–46.
18. Stevens G. A. Burley J., 1997. 3000 raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success. Research Technology
Management, May-June, pp. 16–27.
19. The PDMA Glossary for New Product Development. Product Development & Management
Association 2012.
20. Trott P., 2011. Innovation Management and New Product Development, 5th ed. Harlow: Prentice
Hall, Pearson Education.
21. Walker R., 2013. Winning with Risk Management (Financial Engineering and Risk Management).
Hackensack, New York: World Scientific Publishing.
22. Wheelwright S. C., Clark C. B., 1992. Revolutionizing Product Development. New York: The
Free Press.