Cooperation for Innovation and Its Influence on Enterprises’ Innovativeness Level
Main Article Content
Abstrakt
Innovation is one of the key sources in obtaining competitive advantage by enterprises. The ability
to innovate is generally accepted as a critical success factor for competitiveness and firms’ performance.
The paper discusses cooperation for innovation and its influence on enterprises’ innovativeness
level. The main aim of the article is to determine the relationship between cooperation for
innovation and innovativeness of the surveyed companies, which is investigated empirically. The
paper discusses the channels and level of cooperation taking place in enterprises corresponding
to its sources, specific character and determining the significance of the impact of cooperation
for innovation on the actual level of innovativeness. The specific objectives of the article relate
to examining what kind of cooperation for innovation occurs in enterprises and whether there is
a relationship between the cooperation and innovativeness level of the enterprise. The study is based
on a survey of firms (n = 100) located in Poland. The article first establishes the research framework,
then deduces the research hypothesis and finally describes the analysis tools, the sample structure
and statistical methods. The analysis has been done with the SPSS software. The statistical method
used in the survey is multiple step regression. The study has determined the positive relationship
between cooperation and innovativeness of the surveyed enterprises. The relation between cooperation
and innovativeness is positive concerning the channels of vertical cooperation, especially
in the area of cooperation with suppliers of equipment, materials, components or software. These
findings suggest that the measurement of cooperation for innovation and its channels should be developed further in order to make it a more relevant concept for empirical studies of enterprises’
innovativeness and competitiveness.
Downloads
Article Details
Bibliografia
for innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 23, no. 3.
2. De Faria P., Lima F., & Santos R., 2010. Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance
of partners. Research Policy, vol. 39, no. 8.
3. Drew S. A. W., 1997. From knowledge to action: the impact of benchmarking on organizational
performance. Long Range Planning, vol. 30, no. 3.
4. Gallego J., Rubalcaba L., & Suárez C., 2013. Knowledge for innovation in Europe: The role of
external knowledge on firms’ cooperation strategies. Journal of Business Research, vol. 66, no. 10.
5. Glaister K. W., & Buckley P. J., 1996. Strategic Motives for International Alliance Formation.
Journal of Management Studies, vol. 33.
6. Hewitt-Dundas, N., 2013. The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation.
“The Journal of Technology Transfer”, vol. 38, no. 2.
7. Huang K. F., & Yu C. M. J., 2011. The effect of competitive and non-competitive R&D collaboration
on firm innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 36, no. 4.
8. Jong J. P., Marsili O., 2006. The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms.
Research Policy, vol. 35.
9. Laursen K., Salter A., 2006. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation
performance among U. K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 27, no. 2.
10. Lu L., Zhuo Z., Min X., 2016. Research on the Relationship of Innovation Capability and
Operating Performance Based on Moderation of Openness. Technology and Investment, vol. 7.
11. Mansfield E., 1975. International Technology Transfer: Forms, Resources Requirements, and
Policies. The American Economic Review, vol. 65, no. 2.
12. Prahalad C. K., Ramaswamy V., 2000. Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business
Review, vol. 78, no. 1.
13. Teece D. J., 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements
for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of economic behavior & organization,
vol. 18, no. 1.
14. Veugelers R., & Cassiman B., 2005. R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some
empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization,
vol. 23, no. 5.
15. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J., 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation.
Omega, vol. 3, no. 6.