Peloponnesian issues. Democracy against the law. Hybris of radicals

Main Article Content

Jerzy Oniszczuk

Abstract

The defeat of the Hellenes in the Peloponnesian war in the 5th century B. C. happened a number of centuries after a deathly silence following the Trojan War and so called dark ages (lasting three centuries) as well as after popular stories on heroes of Mycenae and after poetic (Homer) times of storytelling. Those stories created an idea organizing a new world of archaic Greeks. The Peloponnesian events closed – in a way again – the certain order; this time it was the order of democrats characterized by the hubris of aristocracy (Athens) and the order of oligarchs characterized by the arrogance of democrats (Sparta). While the Trojan war prepared the fall of king Agamemnon, the Athens’ war prepared the king’s come back, this time the Macedonian one, who – craving for the fame of an Achaean hero -followed the path of a Mycenae ruler. Finally, the Peloponnesian war did not bring success of some Greek poleis or the whole Greece. Results of this war are expressed by a conclusion on the common Peloponnesian failure. It was a clash of interests of oligarchic order with democracy. What is important, a serious conflict arose: populist (majority) democracy against law and justice. This conflict was possible due to the lack of any institution of a public arbiter or moral authority, which could prevent a fall of moderation as an essential (sine qua non) feature of democracy (Solon). There is no democracy without moderation and self-resistance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Oniszczuk , J. . (2018). Peloponnesian issues. Democracy against the law. Hybris of radicals. Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego. Studia I Prace, (4 (36), 29–63. Retrieved from https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/kwes/article/view/1304
Section
Articles

References

1. Cross M., The Creativity of Crete City States and The Foundations of The Modern World, Signal Books, Oxford 2011.
2. Daves J. K., Cultural, Social and Economic Features of the Hellenistic World, „Cambridge Ancient History’’ VII, 1, 1984.
3. Dziubka K., Teoria demokratycznej obywatelskości – zarys problemu, [w:] Społeczeństwo obywatelskie, red. W. Bokajło, K. Dziubek, Wydawnictwo UWr., Wrocław 2001.
4. Głąbiowski K., Wychowanek ateńskiej demokracji wielbicielem monarchii perskiej, [w:] Ksenofont, Wychowanie Cyrusa (Cyropaedia), tłum. K. Głąbiowski, B. Burliga, A. Marchewka, A. Ryś, ISKŚiO UWr., Wrocław 2014.
5. M. H. Hansen, Polis. Wprowadzenie do dziejów greckiego miasta-państwa w starożytności, Wydawnictwa UW, Warszawa 2011.
6. Harris E. M., Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens: Essays on Law, Society, and Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
7. Herodot, Dzieje, tłum. S. Hammer, Czytelnik, Warszawa 2004.
8. Krawczuk A., Mity, Mędrcy, Polityka, PIW, Warszawa 1975.
9. Kulesza R., Sparta w V–IV wieku p.n.e., Mada, Warszawa 2003.
10. Lengauer W., Starożytna Grecja okresu archaicznego i klasycznego, DiG, Warszawa 1999.
11. Murray O., Narodziny Grecji, tłum. A. Twardecki, Prószyński i S-ka SA, Warszawa 2004.
12. Oniszczuk J., Przemoc – Pokój – Prawa człowieka, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2016.
13. Parker V., Tyrans and Lawgivers, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, red. H. A. Shapiro, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007.
14. Ryan A., On Politics. A History of Political Thought. From Herodotus to the Present, Book One, Liveright Publ. Corp., New York/London 2012.
15. Saxonhouse A. W., Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists, „Political Science and Politics’’ 26, 1993.
16. Sokrates, [w]: Obrona Sokratesa, [w]: Platon, Uczta, Eutyfron, Obrona Sokratesa, Kriton, Fedon, PWN, Warszawa 1982,
17. Tukidydes, Wojna peloponeska, tłum. K. Kumaniecki, Czytelnik, Warszawa 1988.
18. W. Witwicki, [w]: Platon, Uczta, Eutyfron, Obrona Sokratesa, Kriton, Fedon, PWN, Warszawa 1982.
19. Zieliński T., Grecja niepodległa, Wydawnictwo „Śląsk’’, Warszawa 1995.