Wpływ modyfikacji metody pomiaru CAB na cykliczny komponent dochodów budżetowych na przykładzie państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej

Main Article Content

Anna Moździerz

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to evaluate the impact of the 2013 modification ofthe method of estimating the CAB structural balance on the size of the cyclicalcomponent of public revenues of the Visegrad Group States. The article using theparameters of sensitivity and semi-elasticity identified differences in responseof public revenues to GDP and its cyclic change in the analyzed countries. Theestimations were carried out with regard to the share of specific types of publicrevenues in total revenues between 2004–2013. The research indicates that thechange in methodology slightly affected the size of the CAB in the analyzedcountries, but significantly affected the cyclical component of revenues. The newmethod is nearer to the concept of structural balance, but not without limitations.The issue has important practical significance, since in terms of the new EU fiscalsurveillance structural balance is the primary criterion for assessing fiscal policyof Member States

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Moździerz, A. (2015). Wpływ modyfikacji metody pomiaru CAB na cykliczny komponent dochodów budżetowych na przykładzie państw Grupy Wyszehradzkiej. Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego. Studia I Prace, 4(3), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.33119/KKESSiP.2015.4.3.4
Section
Articles

References

Brandner P., Diebalek L.,Schuberth H., Structural Budget Deficits and Sustainability ofFiscal Positions in the European Union, “Oesterreichische Nationalbank WorkingPaper” 1998, No. 26.
Cyclical Adjustment of Budget Balances, European Commission, Autumn 2012.
Cyclical Adjustment of Budget Balances, European Commission, Spring 2014.
D'Auria F., Denis C., Havik K., Mc Morrow K., Planas Ch., Raciborski R., Röger W., Rossi A.,The production function methodology for calculating potential growth rates and outputgaps, “European Economy, Economic Papers” 2010, No. 420.
Girouard N., Andre Ch., Measuring Cyclically-Adjusted Budget Balances for OECD Countries,“OECD Working Paper” 2005, ECO/WKP (2005).
Gradzewicz M., Kolasa M., Szacowanie luki popytowej dla gospodarki polskiej przy wykorzystaniumetody VECM, „Bank i Kredyt” 2004, nr 2.
Krajewski P., Strukturalny i cykliczny komponent deficytu budżetowego w Polsce, WydawnictwoUniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2006.
Mourre G., Isbasoiu G.‑M., Paternoster D., Salto M., The cyclically-adjusted budget balanceused in the EU fiscal framework: an update, “European Commission Economic Papers”2013, No. 478.
Moździerz A., Nierównowaga finansów publicznych, PWE, Warszawa 2008.
New and updated budgetary sensitivities for the EU budgetary surveillance, Informationnote for the Economic and Policy Committee, European Commission, Brussels 2005,ECFIN/B/6 (2005) REP54508.
Noord van den P., The Size and Role of Automatic Fiscal Stabilizers in the 1990 s and Beyond,“OECD Economics Department Working Papers” 2000, ECO/WKP (2000) 3, No. 230.
Reiss L., Structural Budget Balances: Calculation. Problems and Benefits, “MonetaryPolicy & The Economy” 2013, No. Q1/13.
Report on public finances in EMU, European Economy, European Commission, 2013,No. 4, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2013/pdf/ee-2013–4.pdf
Rozporządzenie Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) nr 1175/2011 z dnia 16 listopada2011 r., Dz. U. L 306 z 23.11.2011.
Taxation trends in the European Union. Data for the EU Member States. Iceland and Norway,Statistical books, Eurostat, Luxembourg 2014.
Traktat o stabilności, koordynacji i zarządzaniu w Unii Gospodarczej i Walutowej, Bruksela,2.02.2012.