Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

Pomimo rosnącego znaczenia rodzinności w przedsiębiorstwach rodzinnych, niewiele jeszcze wiadomo na temat jej wpływu na ich efektywność. Wykorzystując teorię funkcjonowania przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych i zarządzania strategicznego, w niniejszym artykule podjęto próbę zidentyfikowania wymiarów rodzinności oraz omówiono wpływ każdego z nich na przewagę konkurencyjną przedsiębiorstwa. Na podstawie danych ze 149 polskich przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych empirycznie potwierdzono bezpośredni wpływ rodzinności na efektywność organizacyjną, mierzoną jako przewagę konkurencyjną. Znaleziono również dowody dla wielowymiarowości konstruktu „rodzinność”, który składa się z pięciu wymiarów. Przeprowadzone badania przyczyniają się do poszerzenia wiedzy w obszarze zarządzania strategicznego poprzez ukazanie, w jaki sposób specyficzny zbiór wymiarów rodzinności wpływa na efektywność przedsiębiorstwa rodzinnego.

Słowa kluczowe

rodzinność przewaga konkurencyjna konstrukt wielowymiarowy

Szczegóły artykułu

Jak cytować
Bratnicka-Myśliwiec, K. ., & Ingram, . T. . (2017). Rodzinność i przewaga konkurencyjna – kontekst polskich przedsiębiorstw. Edukacja Ekonomistów I Menedżerów, 43(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0009.8138

Referencje

    1. Aldrich, H.E., Cliff, J.E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573–596
    2. Anderson, R.C., Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding‑family ownership and firm performan‑ce: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1328.
    3. Antoncic, B., Hisrich, R.D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement andcross‑cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 495–527.
    4. Arosa, B., Iturralde, T., Maseda, A. (2010). Ownership structure and firm performance in non‑listed firms: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 88–96.
    5. Astrachan, J.H., Jaskiewicz, P. (2008). Emotional returns and emotional costs in pri‑vately held family businesses: Advancing traditional business valuation. FamilyBusiness Review, 21, 139–149.
    6. Banos Monroy, V.I., Ramirez Solis, E.R., Rodriguez‑Aceves, L. (2015). Familiness andits relationship with performance in Mexican family firms. Academy of StrategicManagement Journal, 14(2), 1–21.
    7. Basco, R., Rodriguez, M.J. (2009). Studying the family enterprise holistically. Evidencefor integrated family and business systems. Family Business Review, 22, 82–95.
    8. Bednorz, K., Bratnicka, K. (2013). Creative organizational climate: The construct andits operationalization. Referat przedstawiony na corocznej konferencji naukowejEuropean Academy of Management, 26–29.06.2013, Stambuł.
    9. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez‑Mejia, L.R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.
    10. Burkhart, M., Panunzi, F., Shleifer, A. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58,2167–2201.
    11. Cameron, K.S., Quinn, R.E. (2015). Kultura organizacyjna – diagnoza i zmiana. Modelwartości konkurujących. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
    12. Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family‑con‑trolled firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29, 249–265.
    13. Carney, M., Essen van, M., Gedajlovic, E.R., Heugens, P.P.M.A.R. (2013). What dowe know about private family firm performance? A meta‑analytical review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 513–545.
    14. Chang, S.J., Shim, J. (2015). When does transitioning from family to professionalmanagement improve firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 36(9),1297–1316.
    15. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the deve‑lopment of a strategic management theory of the family firm. EntrepreneurshipTheory and Practice, 29, 555–575.
    16. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., Steier, L. (2005). Sources and consequences of distinctivefamiliness: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 237–247.
    17. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., Steier, L.P., Rau, S.B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneityin family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6),1103–1113.
    18. Dawson, A., Mussolino, D. (2014). Exploring what makes family firms different: Discrete or overlapping constructs in the literature? Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(2), 169–183.
    19. Dekker, J.C., Lybaert, N., Steijvers, T., Depaire, B., Mercken, R. (2012). Family firmtypes based on the professionalization construct: Exploratory research. FamilyBusiness Review, 26, 81–99.
    20. Denison, D., Lief, C., Ward, J.L. (2004). Culture in family‑owned enterprises:Recognizing and leveraging unique strengths. Family Business Review, 17(1), 61–70.
    21. Distelberg, B.J., Blow, A. (2011). Variations in family system boundaries. FamilyBusiness Review, 24, 28–46.
    22. Eddleston, K.A., Kellermanns, K.W., Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource configuration infamily firms, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 26–50.
    23. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
    24. Frank, H., Kessler, A., Rusch, T., Suess‑Reyes, J., Weismeier‑Sammer, D. (2016).
    25. Capturing the faimiliness of family business: Development of the FamilyInfluence Familiness Scale (FIFS). Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 3, 1–34.
    26. Galve, G.C., Salas, F.V. (1996). Ownership structure and firm performance: Some em‑ pirical evidence from Spain. Managerial & Decision Economics, 17, 575–586.
    27. Gomez‑Mejia, L.R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., Castro, J.D. (2011). The bind that ties:Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of ManagementAnnals, 5(1), 653–707.
    28. Gomez‑Mejia, L.R., Haynes, K.T., Nunez‑Nickel, M., Jacobson, K.J.L., Moyano‑Fuentes,J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family‑controlled firms:Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52,106–137.
    29. Habbershon, T.G., Williams, M., MacMillan, I. (2003). A unified systems perspectiveof family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 451–465.
    30. Hack, A. (2009). Sind family business anders? Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme desaktuellen Forschungsstands. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Ergänzungsheft, 2,1–29.
    31. Hair Jr., J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariatedata analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    32. Hall, A., Melin, L., Nordqvist, M. (2001). Entrepreneurship as radical change in familybusiness: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review, 14(3),193–208.
    33. Herrero, I. (2011). Agency costs, family ties, and firm efficiency. Journal of Management,37, 887–904.
    34. Hienerth, C., Kessler, A. (2006). Measuring success in family businesses: The conceptof configurational fit. Family Business Review, 19(2), 115–135.
    35. Hoy, F., Sharma, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial family firms. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
    36. Ibrahim, A.B., McGuire, J., Soufani, K. (2009). An empirical investigation of afactorscontributing to longevity of small family firms. Global Economy & Finance Journal,2, 1–21.
    37. Ingram, T. (2016). Relationships between talent management and organizational per‑formance: The role of climate for creativity. Entrepreneurial Business and EconomicsReview, 4(3), 195–205.
    38. Irava, W., Moores, K. (2010). Clarifying the strategy advantage of familiness:Unbunding its dimensions and highlighting its paradoxes. Journal of FamilyBusiness Strategy, 1, 131–144.
    39. Jaskiewicz, P., González, V.M., Menéndez, S., Schiereck, D. (2005). Long‑run IPOperformance analysis of German and Spanish family‑owned businesses. FamilyBusiness Review, 18, 179–202.
    40. Jeżak, J., Kornecki, J., Krajenta‑Kopeć, A. (2014). Skala i ekonomiczne znaczenieprzedsiębiorstw rodzinnych w Polsce (raport z badań empirycznych). W: J. Jeżak(red.), Przedsiębiorstwa rodzinne w Polsce. Znaczenie ekonomiczne oraz strategiczneproblemy rozwoju. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 25–60.
    41. Klein, S.B., Astrachan, J.H., Smyrnios, K.X. (2005). The F‑PEC scale of family influen‑ce: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. EntrepreneurshipTheory and Practice, 29(3), 321–339.
    42. Kline, P. (1999). Handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
    43. Lambrecht, F., Korainen, M. (2009). Co‑creating psychological ownership for the chan‑ging family firm: Applying a relational practice perspective. Referat wygłoszony na9 konferencji pt. World Family Business Research Conference, IFERA, 24–27.06.2009,Limasol, Cypr
    44. Lauterbach, B., Vaninsky, A. (1999). Ownership structure and firm performance:Evidence from Israel. Journal of Management and Governance, 3, 189–201.
    45. Leenders, M., Waarts, E. (2003). Competitiveness and evolution of family businesses:The role of family and business orientation. European Management Journal, 21,686–697.
    46. Litz, R.A., Pearson, A., Litchfield, S. (2012). Charting the future of family businessresearch: Perspectives from the field. Family Business Review, 25, 16–32.
    47. Matser, I.A. (2013). Strategic resources and family firm performance. Utrecht: UtrechtUniversity.
    48. Mazzi, C. (2011). Family business and financial performance: Current state ofknowledge and future research challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2,166–181.
    49. McConaughy, D.L., Matthews, C.H., Fialko, A.S. (2001). Founding family controlledfirms: Performance, risk, and value. Journal of Small Business Management, 39,31–50.
    50. Mehrotra V., Morck R., Shim J.W., Wiwattanakantang, Y. (2013). Adoptive expecta‑tions: Rising sons in Japanese family firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 108,840–854.
    51. Miller, D., Breton‑Miller Le, I. (2005). Managing for the long run. Boston: HarvardBusiness School Press.
    52. Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., MacMillan, I.C. (2010). Top management teams in fa‑mily‑controlled companies: Familiness, faultlines, and their impact on financialperformance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 205–222.
    53. Molly, V., Laveren, E., Deloof, M. (2010). Family business succession and its impact onfinancial structure and performance. Family Business Review, 23, 131–147.
    54. Moores, K. (2009). Paradigms and theory building in the domain of business fami‑lies. Family Business Review, 22, 167–180.
    55. Mukherjee, K., Aggarwal‑Gupta, M. (2016). Performance management in a family bu‑siness firm – sensemaking by change participants. Referat wygłoszony na corocznejkonferencji British Academy of Management, 6–8.09.2016, Newcastle.
    56. Nordqvist, M. (2005). Familiness in top management teams: Commentary on Ensley and Pearson’s “An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 285–291.
    57. Nordqvist, M., Sharma, P., Chirico, F. (2014). Family firm heterogeneity and gover‑ nance: A configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 192–209.
    58. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGrow‑Hill.
    59. Olson, P.D., Zuiker, V.S., Danes, S.M., Stafford, K., Heck, R.K.Z., Duncan, K.A. (2003). The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 639–666.
    60. Oswald, S.L., Muse, L.A., Rutherford, M.W. (2009). The influence of large stake familycontrol on performance: Is it agency or entrenchment? Journal of Small BusinessManagement, 47, 116–135.
    61. Pearson, A.W., Holt, D.T., Carr, J.C. (2014). Scales in family business studies. W:L. Melin, M. Nordqvist, P. Sharma (red.), The Sage handbook of family busi‑ness. London: Sage, 551–572.
    62. Porta La, R., Lopez‑de‑Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around theworld. Journal of Finance, 54, 471–518.
    63. Rutherford, M.W., Kuratko, D.F., Holt, D.T. (2008). Examining the link between„Familiness” and performance. Can the F‑PEC untangle the family business the‑ory jungle? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 11, 1089–1109.
    64. Safin, K. (2007). Przedsiębiorstwa rodzinne – istota i zachowania strategiczne. Wrocław:Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej.
    65. Sharma, P. (2008). Commentary: Familiness: Capital stocks and flows between familyand business. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 11, 971–977.
    66. Stewart, A. (2003). Help one another: Toward an anthropology of family busi‑ness. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27, 383–396.
    67. Tagiuri, R., Davis, J.A. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family BusinessReview, 9(2), 199–208.
    68. Tokarczyk, J., Hansen, E., Green, M., Down, J. (2007). A resource‑based view and mar‑ket orientation theory examination of the role of “familiness” in family businesssuccession. Family Business Review, 20, 17–31.
    69. Weinzimmer, L.G., Nystrom, P.C., Freeman, S.J. (1998). Measuring organizationalgrowth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 24, 235–262.
    70. Weismeier‑Sammer, D., Frank, H., Schlippe von, A. (2013). Untangling “familiness”:A literature review and directions for future research. International Journal forEntrepreneurship and Innovation, 14(3), 165–177.
    71. Yu, A., Lumpkin, G.T., Sorenson, R.L., Brigham, K.H. (2012). The landscape of familybusiness outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variable. Family Business Review, 25, 33–57.
    72. Zahra, S. (2003). International expansion of U.S. manufacturing family businesses:The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18,495–512.
    73. Zahra, S.A., Hayton, J.C., Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non‑fa‑mily firms: A resource‑based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 28, 363–381.
    74. Zellweger, T.M., Eddleston, K.A., Kellermanns, F.W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 54–63.