Pasek boczny artykułu
Przesłane
stycznia 2, 2020
Opublikowane
czerwca 30, 2015
Pobieranie
Statystyczny
Read Counter :
52
Pobieranie : 42
Treść głównego artykułu
Abstrakt
Katedra Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie
Słowa kluczowe
studia zarządzania
korporacyjne uniwersytety
edukacja w korporacjach
szkolenia w korporacjach
Szczegóły artykułu
Licencja
Autor (Autorzy) artykułu oświadcza, że przesłane opracowanie nie narusza praw autorskich osób trzecich. Wyraża zgodę na poddanie artykułu procedurze recenzji oraz dokonanie zmian redakcyjnych. Przenosi nieodpłatnie na Oficynę Wydawniczą SGH autorskie prawa majątkowe do utworu na polach eksploatacji wymienionych w art. 50 Ustawy z dnia 4 lutego 1994 r. o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych – pod warunkiem, że praca została zaakceptowana do publikacji i opublikowana.
Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH posiada autorskie prawa majątkowe do wszystkich treści czasopisma. Zamieszczenie tekstu artykuły w repozytorium, na stronie domowej autora lub na innej stronie jest dozwolone o ile nie wiąże się z pozyskiwaniem korzyści majątkowych, a tekst wyposażony będzie w informacje źródłowe (w tym również tytuł, rok, numer i adres internetowy czasopisma).
Osoby zainteresowane komercyjnym wykorzystaniem zawartości czasopisma proszone są o kontakt z Redakcją.
Jak cytować
Klich, J. . (2015). Korporacje jako konkurenci uniwersytetów na rynku usług edukacyjnych. Edukacja Ekonomistów I Menedżerów, 36(2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0009.4602
Referencje
-
1. Almeida, R., Carneiro, P. (2009). The return to firm investment in human capital. Labour Economics, 16, 97–106.
2. Antonelli, G., Cappiello, G., Pedrini, G. (2013). The Corporate University in the European utility industries. Utilities Policy, 25, 33–41.
3. Barrett, A., O’Connell, P.J. (2001). Does training generalny work? The return of in company training. Industrial and Labour Relation Review, 54, 623–655.
4. Beenen, G., Goodman, P.S. (2014). Too Little of a good thing? How organizational lear ning contracts can refocus B schools on the business of learning. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 248–259.
5. Bhanji, Z. (2008). Transnational corporations in education: filling the governance gap through new social norms and market multilateralism?. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(1), 55–73.
6. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J.J., Ciganek, A.P. (2012). Critical success factors for e learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855.
7. Chanin Ballance (2013). Use of games in training: interactive experiences that engage us to learn. Industrial & Commercial Training, 45(4), 218–221.
8. Chomsky, N. (2014). Thinking Like Corporations is Harming American Universities. Pobrano 8 marca 2015 z: http://www.alternet.org/education/chomsky thinking corporations harming american universities
9. Chung, H.F.L., Yang, Z., Huang, P H. (2015). How does organizational learning matter in strategic business performance? The contingency role of quanxi networking. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1216–1224.
10. Cristian, C. (2014). The involvement of the universities in adult education – compul sion or necessity?. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 214–219.
11. Crocetti, C. (2002). Corporate learning. A knowledge management perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 271–285.
12. Elmuti, D., Abebe, M., Nicolosi, M. (2005). An overview of strategic alliances between universities and corporation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2), 115–129.
13. Eurich, N.P. (1985). Corporate Classrooms. The learning business. Princeton, N.J.: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
14. Fleet van, J.W. (2011). Increasing the Impact of Corporate Engagement in Education: Lanscape and Challenges. Global Compact on Learning, 6. Pobrano 18 marca 2015 z: http://www.brookings.edu/research/speeches/2011/07/12 corporate engage ment vanfleet
15. Hall, B. (2014). Learning Trends: Here Today and Tomorrow. The future of enterprise learning will see today’s trends become the norm. June 18. Pobrano 12 marca 2015 z: http://www.clomedia.com/articles/5688 here today and tomorrow
16. Heraty, N. (2004). Towards an architecture of organization led learning. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 449–472.
17. Hsieh Po An, J.J., Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e Learning tools’ success: The case of instructor–student interactive vs. self paced to olds. Computers & Education, 57, 2025–2038.
18. Hussein, N., Mohamad, A., Noordin, F., Ishak, N.A. (2014). Learning Organization and its Effect on Organizational Performance and Organizational Innovativeness: A Proposed Framework for Malaysian Public Institutions of Higher Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 299–304.
19. Javis, P. (2012). Universities and Corporate Universities: The Higher Learning Industry in Global Society. Abingdon–New York: Milton Park–Routledge.
20. Jiménez Jiménez, D., Sanz Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417.
21. Kettula, K., Berghäll, S. (2013). Drama based role play: a tool to supplement work based learning in higher education. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(8), 556–575.
22. Kim, N., Atuahene Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Product Development & Management Association, 27(4), 519–536.
23. Lovat, T. (2011), Values education and holistic learning: Updated research perspecti ves. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 148–152.
24. McQuerrey, L. (nd). Corporate Jobs for Teachers. Demand Media. Pobrano 21 marca 2015 z: http://work.chron.com/corporate jobs teachers 13520.html
25. Meister, J.C. (1998). Corporate Universities: lessons in building a world class workforce, New York: McGraw Hill.
26. Phelps, S.B. (nd). Higher Education Institutions and Corporations: a Diverse Relationship. Pobrano 20 marca 2015 z: http://www.evolllution.com/opinions/higher education institutions and corporations a diverse relationship
27. Prince C., Beaver, G. (2001). The Rise and Rise of the Corporate University: the emerging corporate learning agenda. The International Journal of Management Education, 1(2), 17–26.
28. Rhoades, G. (2005). Capitalism, Academic Style, and Shared Governance. Academe, 91(3), 38–42.
29. Rousseau, D.M. (2012). Designing a better business school: channeling Herb Simon, addressing the critics, and developing actionable knowledge for professionalizing managers. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 600–618.
30. Santos Vijande, M.L., López Sánchez, H.Á, Trespalacios, J.A. (2012). How organiza tional learning affects a firm/s flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1079–1089.
31. Schiller, J., Arena, C. (2012). How Corporations Are Helping To Solve The Education Crisis. Pobrano 17 marca 2015 z: http://www.fastcoexist.com/1679529/how corp orations are helping to solve the education crisis
32. Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
33. Sit, V. (2008). The Erosion of the University as a Public Sphere. Education. Canada, 48(4), 30–33.
34. Skorczynska, H. (2014). Metaphor and education: Reaching business training goals through multimodal metaphor. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2344–2351.
35. Stephens, R., Richey, M. (2011). Accelerating STEM capacity: A complex adaptive sys tem perspective. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 417–423.
36. Sussman, M.J. (2011). Teaching about Complex Sociotechnical Systems (CSS). MIT EDS Working Paper. Pobrano 14 marca 2015 z: http://esd.mit.edu/wps/2010/ esd wp 2010 02.pdf
37. Sztompka, P. (2014). Uniwersytet współczesny: zderzenie dwóch kultur. Pobrano 12 mar ca 2015 z: http://kongresakademicki.pl/uniwersytet wspolczesny zderzenie dwoch kultur
38. Thomas, L.P. (2013). Corporations Are Behind the Common Core State Standards – And That’s Why They’ll Never Work. Pobrano 8 marca 2015 z: http://www.alternet.org/ education/corporations are behind common core state standards and thats wh y theyll never work
39. Tuchman, G., Wannabe, U. (2009). Inside the Corporate University. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
40. Walton, J. (1999). Strategic Human Resource Development. London: Pitman.
41. Watters, A. (2011). What Role Do Corporations Play in Supporting STEM Education?. Pobrano 12 marca 2015 z: http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2011/07/what role d o corporations play in supporting stem education
42. Wolter, H. (1999). Taking your training system virtual: A model to consider. Chemical Health & Safety, 6(6), 23–26.
43. Woodard, D. (2013). The Corporate Takeover of Public Education. Huffington Post. Pobrano 24 marca 2015 z: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diann woodard/ the corporate takeover_b_3397091.html
44. Wright, S. (2004). Markets, Corporations, Consumers?. New Landscapes of Higher Education. Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 1(2), 71–94.
Referencje
1. Almeida, R., Carneiro, P. (2009). The return to firm investment in human capital. Labour Economics, 16, 97–106.
2. Antonelli, G., Cappiello, G., Pedrini, G. (2013). The Corporate University in the European utility industries. Utilities Policy, 25, 33–41.
3. Barrett, A., O’Connell, P.J. (2001). Does training generalny work? The return of in company training. Industrial and Labour Relation Review, 54, 623–655.
4. Beenen, G., Goodman, P.S. (2014). Too Little of a good thing? How organizational lear ning contracts can refocus B schools on the business of learning. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 248–259.
5. Bhanji, Z. (2008). Transnational corporations in education: filling the governance gap through new social norms and market multilateralism?. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(1), 55–73.
6. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J.J., Ciganek, A.P. (2012). Critical success factors for e learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855.
7. Chanin Ballance (2013). Use of games in training: interactive experiences that engage us to learn. Industrial & Commercial Training, 45(4), 218–221.
8. Chomsky, N. (2014). Thinking Like Corporations is Harming American Universities. Pobrano 8 marca 2015 z: http://www.alternet.org/education/chomsky thinking corporations harming american universities
9. Chung, H.F.L., Yang, Z., Huang, P H. (2015). How does organizational learning matter in strategic business performance? The contingency role of quanxi networking. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1216–1224.
10. Cristian, C. (2014). The involvement of the universities in adult education – compul sion or necessity?. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 214–219.
11. Crocetti, C. (2002). Corporate learning. A knowledge management perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 271–285.
12. Elmuti, D., Abebe, M., Nicolosi, M. (2005). An overview of strategic alliances between universities and corporation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2), 115–129.
13. Eurich, N.P. (1985). Corporate Classrooms. The learning business. Princeton, N.J.: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
14. Fleet van, J.W. (2011). Increasing the Impact of Corporate Engagement in Education: Lanscape and Challenges. Global Compact on Learning, 6. Pobrano 18 marca 2015 z: http://www.brookings.edu/research/speeches/2011/07/12 corporate engage ment vanfleet
15. Hall, B. (2014). Learning Trends: Here Today and Tomorrow. The future of enterprise learning will see today’s trends become the norm. June 18. Pobrano 12 marca 2015 z: http://www.clomedia.com/articles/5688 here today and tomorrow
16. Heraty, N. (2004). Towards an architecture of organization led learning. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 449–472.
17. Hsieh Po An, J.J., Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e Learning tools’ success: The case of instructor–student interactive vs. self paced to olds. Computers & Education, 57, 2025–2038.
18. Hussein, N., Mohamad, A., Noordin, F., Ishak, N.A. (2014). Learning Organization and its Effect on Organizational Performance and Organizational Innovativeness: A Proposed Framework for Malaysian Public Institutions of Higher Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 299–304.
19. Javis, P. (2012). Universities and Corporate Universities: The Higher Learning Industry in Global Society. Abingdon–New York: Milton Park–Routledge.
20. Jiménez Jiménez, D., Sanz Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417.
21. Kettula, K., Berghäll, S. (2013). Drama based role play: a tool to supplement work based learning in higher education. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(8), 556–575.
22. Kim, N., Atuahene Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Product Development & Management Association, 27(4), 519–536.
23. Lovat, T. (2011), Values education and holistic learning: Updated research perspecti ves. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 148–152.
24. McQuerrey, L. (nd). Corporate Jobs for Teachers. Demand Media. Pobrano 21 marca 2015 z: http://work.chron.com/corporate jobs teachers 13520.html
25. Meister, J.C. (1998). Corporate Universities: lessons in building a world class workforce, New York: McGraw Hill.
26. Phelps, S.B. (nd). Higher Education Institutions and Corporations: a Diverse Relationship. Pobrano 20 marca 2015 z: http://www.evolllution.com/opinions/higher education institutions and corporations a diverse relationship
27. Prince C., Beaver, G. (2001). The Rise and Rise of the Corporate University: the emerging corporate learning agenda. The International Journal of Management Education, 1(2), 17–26.
28. Rhoades, G. (2005). Capitalism, Academic Style, and Shared Governance. Academe, 91(3), 38–42.
29. Rousseau, D.M. (2012). Designing a better business school: channeling Herb Simon, addressing the critics, and developing actionable knowledge for professionalizing managers. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 600–618.
30. Santos Vijande, M.L., López Sánchez, H.Á, Trespalacios, J.A. (2012). How organiza tional learning affects a firm/s flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1079–1089.
31. Schiller, J., Arena, C. (2012). How Corporations Are Helping To Solve The Education Crisis. Pobrano 17 marca 2015 z: http://www.fastcoexist.com/1679529/how corp orations are helping to solve the education crisis
32. Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
33. Sit, V. (2008). The Erosion of the University as a Public Sphere. Education. Canada, 48(4), 30–33.
34. Skorczynska, H. (2014). Metaphor and education: Reaching business training goals through multimodal metaphor. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2344–2351.
35. Stephens, R., Richey, M. (2011). Accelerating STEM capacity: A complex adaptive sys tem perspective. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 417–423.
36. Sussman, M.J. (2011). Teaching about Complex Sociotechnical Systems (CSS). MIT EDS Working Paper. Pobrano 14 marca 2015 z: http://esd.mit.edu/wps/2010/ esd wp 2010 02.pdf
37. Sztompka, P. (2014). Uniwersytet współczesny: zderzenie dwóch kultur. Pobrano 12 mar ca 2015 z: http://kongresakademicki.pl/uniwersytet wspolczesny zderzenie dwoch kultur
38. Thomas, L.P. (2013). Corporations Are Behind the Common Core State Standards – And That’s Why They’ll Never Work. Pobrano 8 marca 2015 z: http://www.alternet.org/ education/corporations are behind common core state standards and thats wh y theyll never work
39. Tuchman, G., Wannabe, U. (2009). Inside the Corporate University. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
40. Walton, J. (1999). Strategic Human Resource Development. London: Pitman.
41. Watters, A. (2011). What Role Do Corporations Play in Supporting STEM Education?. Pobrano 12 marca 2015 z: http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2011/07/what role d o corporations play in supporting stem education
42. Wolter, H. (1999). Taking your training system virtual: A model to consider. Chemical Health & Safety, 6(6), 23–26.
43. Woodard, D. (2013). The Corporate Takeover of Public Education. Huffington Post. Pobrano 24 marca 2015 z: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diann woodard/ the corporate takeover_b_3397091.html
44. Wright, S. (2004). Markets, Corporations, Consumers?. New Landscapes of Higher Education. Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 1(2), 71–94.
2. Antonelli, G., Cappiello, G., Pedrini, G. (2013). The Corporate University in the European utility industries. Utilities Policy, 25, 33–41.
3. Barrett, A., O’Connell, P.J. (2001). Does training generalny work? The return of in company training. Industrial and Labour Relation Review, 54, 623–655.
4. Beenen, G., Goodman, P.S. (2014). Too Little of a good thing? How organizational lear ning contracts can refocus B schools on the business of learning. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 248–259.
5. Bhanji, Z. (2008). Transnational corporations in education: filling the governance gap through new social norms and market multilateralism?. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(1), 55–73.
6. Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J.J., Ciganek, A.P. (2012). Critical success factors for e learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855.
7. Chanin Ballance (2013). Use of games in training: interactive experiences that engage us to learn. Industrial & Commercial Training, 45(4), 218–221.
8. Chomsky, N. (2014). Thinking Like Corporations is Harming American Universities. Pobrano 8 marca 2015 z: http://www.alternet.org/education/chomsky thinking corporations harming american universities
9. Chung, H.F.L., Yang, Z., Huang, P H. (2015). How does organizational learning matter in strategic business performance? The contingency role of quanxi networking. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1216–1224.
10. Cristian, C. (2014). The involvement of the universities in adult education – compul sion or necessity?. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 214–219.
11. Crocetti, C. (2002). Corporate learning. A knowledge management perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 271–285.
12. Elmuti, D., Abebe, M., Nicolosi, M. (2005). An overview of strategic alliances between universities and corporation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2), 115–129.
13. Eurich, N.P. (1985). Corporate Classrooms. The learning business. Princeton, N.J.: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
14. Fleet van, J.W. (2011). Increasing the Impact of Corporate Engagement in Education: Lanscape and Challenges. Global Compact on Learning, 6. Pobrano 18 marca 2015 z: http://www.brookings.edu/research/speeches/2011/07/12 corporate engage ment vanfleet
15. Hall, B. (2014). Learning Trends: Here Today and Tomorrow. The future of enterprise learning will see today’s trends become the norm. June 18. Pobrano 12 marca 2015 z: http://www.clomedia.com/articles/5688 here today and tomorrow
16. Heraty, N. (2004). Towards an architecture of organization led learning. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 449–472.
17. Hsieh Po An, J.J., Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e Learning tools’ success: The case of instructor–student interactive vs. self paced to olds. Computers & Education, 57, 2025–2038.
18. Hussein, N., Mohamad, A., Noordin, F., Ishak, N.A. (2014). Learning Organization and its Effect on Organizational Performance and Organizational Innovativeness: A Proposed Framework for Malaysian Public Institutions of Higher Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 299–304.
19. Javis, P. (2012). Universities and Corporate Universities: The Higher Learning Industry in Global Society. Abingdon–New York: Milton Park–Routledge.
20. Jiménez Jiménez, D., Sanz Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417.
21. Kettula, K., Berghäll, S. (2013). Drama based role play: a tool to supplement work based learning in higher education. Journal of Workplace Learning, 25(8), 556–575.
22. Kim, N., Atuahene Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Product Development & Management Association, 27(4), 519–536.
23. Lovat, T. (2011), Values education and holistic learning: Updated research perspecti ves. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 148–152.
24. McQuerrey, L. (nd). Corporate Jobs for Teachers. Demand Media. Pobrano 21 marca 2015 z: http://work.chron.com/corporate jobs teachers 13520.html
25. Meister, J.C. (1998). Corporate Universities: lessons in building a world class workforce, New York: McGraw Hill.
26. Phelps, S.B. (nd). Higher Education Institutions and Corporations: a Diverse Relationship. Pobrano 20 marca 2015 z: http://www.evolllution.com/opinions/higher education institutions and corporations a diverse relationship
27. Prince C., Beaver, G. (2001). The Rise and Rise of the Corporate University: the emerging corporate learning agenda. The International Journal of Management Education, 1(2), 17–26.
28. Rhoades, G. (2005). Capitalism, Academic Style, and Shared Governance. Academe, 91(3), 38–42.
29. Rousseau, D.M. (2012). Designing a better business school: channeling Herb Simon, addressing the critics, and developing actionable knowledge for professionalizing managers. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 600–618.
30. Santos Vijande, M.L., López Sánchez, H.Á, Trespalacios, J.A. (2012). How organiza tional learning affects a firm/s flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1079–1089.
31. Schiller, J., Arena, C. (2012). How Corporations Are Helping To Solve The Education Crisis. Pobrano 17 marca 2015 z: http://www.fastcoexist.com/1679529/how corp orations are helping to solve the education crisis
32. Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
33. Sit, V. (2008). The Erosion of the University as a Public Sphere. Education. Canada, 48(4), 30–33.
34. Skorczynska, H. (2014). Metaphor and education: Reaching business training goals through multimodal metaphor. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2344–2351.
35. Stephens, R., Richey, M. (2011). Accelerating STEM capacity: A complex adaptive sys tem perspective. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 417–423.
36. Sussman, M.J. (2011). Teaching about Complex Sociotechnical Systems (CSS). MIT EDS Working Paper. Pobrano 14 marca 2015 z: http://esd.mit.edu/wps/2010/ esd wp 2010 02.pdf
37. Sztompka, P. (2014). Uniwersytet współczesny: zderzenie dwóch kultur. Pobrano 12 mar ca 2015 z: http://kongresakademicki.pl/uniwersytet wspolczesny zderzenie dwoch kultur
38. Thomas, L.P. (2013). Corporations Are Behind the Common Core State Standards – And That’s Why They’ll Never Work. Pobrano 8 marca 2015 z: http://www.alternet.org/ education/corporations are behind common core state standards and thats wh y theyll never work
39. Tuchman, G., Wannabe, U. (2009). Inside the Corporate University. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
40. Walton, J. (1999). Strategic Human Resource Development. London: Pitman.
41. Watters, A. (2011). What Role Do Corporations Play in Supporting STEM Education?. Pobrano 12 marca 2015 z: http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2011/07/what role d o corporations play in supporting stem education
42. Wolter, H. (1999). Taking your training system virtual: A model to consider. Chemical Health & Safety, 6(6), 23–26.
43. Woodard, D. (2013). The Corporate Takeover of Public Education. Huffington Post. Pobrano 24 marca 2015 z: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diann woodard/ the corporate takeover_b_3397091.html
44. Wright, S. (2004). Markets, Corporations, Consumers?. New Landscapes of Higher Education. Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences, 1(2), 71–94.