Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

At the current stage of economic and social development, no resources, including knowledge and information, are capable of providing competitive advantages for a long time. Nowadays, success in the global competition between individual companies, regions or even countries depends on the quality of and the ability to create new knowledge and, based on it, engage in the development of new technologies and new products. The key role in creating the triangle of knowledge (education-research-innovation) will belong to universities and research institutes, which should be catalysts of most innovation processes and, ultimately, generators of benefits and well-being. However, the social factors of the quality of working life of young scientists are of no less importance in these processes. The article analyses modern approaches to understanding the essence and role of the concept of the quality of working life and the influence of social factors on it. The purpose of the paper is to determine the influence of social factors on the quality of working life of young scientists in Ukraine and to find mechanisms for its development, taking into account foreign experience. Indicators of the objective assessment of the quality of working life of young specialists in the scientific and educational sphere are shown. Directions for the development and implementation of measures to improve the quality of working life are proposed.

Szczegóły artykułu

Jak cytować
Kyryliuk, V., & Ryabokon, I. . (2022). Social factors of young researchers’ quality of working life formation. Edukacja Ekonomistów I Menedżerów, 65(3). https://doi.org/10.33119/EEIM.2022.65.3

Referencje

  1. Burt, R. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Forthcoming in the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37–54.
  2. Coleman, J. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American
  3. Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
  4. Чалюк, Ю. (2016). Міжнародна координація розвитку соціальної сфери: монографія. Київ: ЦТ «Компринт». [Chalyuk, Y. International coordination of social sphere development: monograph. Kyiv: CT “Comprint”].
  5. Dimas, I., Rebelo, T., Lourenco, & P., Rocha, H. (2019). A Nonlinear Dynamical System Perspective on Team Learning: The Role of Team Culture and Social Cohesion. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-24302-9_4 (accessed: 22.09.2020).
  6. Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2019). Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Retrieved from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480 (accessed: 22.09.2020).
  7. Frane, A., & Roncevic, B. (2003). Social Capital: Recent Debates and Research Trends. Social Science Information, 42, 155–183.
  8. Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press.
  9. Грішнова, О. (2014). Людський, інтелектуальний і соціальний капітал України: сутність, взаємозв’язок, оцінка, напрями розвитку. [Grishnova, O. (2014). Human, intellectual, and social capital of Ukraine: essence, interconnection, estimation, directions of development]. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/stvttp_2014_1_5 (accessed: 14.09.2020).
  10. Grote, G., & Guest, D. (2016). The case for reinvigorating quality of working life research. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018726716654746 (accessed: 16.09.2020).
  11. Heskett, J. (1997). The service profit chain. New York: The Free Press.
  12. Hipolito, M., Masson, V., Monteiro, M. & Gutierrez, G. (2016). Quality of working life: assessment of intervention studies. Retrieved from: https://www.redalyc.org/ pdf/2670/267049841025_2.pdf (accessed: 18.09.2020).
  13. Kyryliuk, V., & Ryabokon, I. (2021). Role of social sphere in ensuring quality of working life. VUZF review, 6 (3), 66–77
  14. Кирилюк, В. (2018). Соціальна згуртованість і соціальний капітал: взаємодія та шляхи розвитку. Автореферат на здобуття наукового ступеня кандидата економічних наук: 08.00.07. [Kyryliuk, V. (2018). Social cohesion and social capital: interaction and ways of development. Abstract for the degree of Candidate of Economic Sciences: 08.00.07].
  15. Lin, N. (1999). Building a Network Theory of Social Capital. Connections, 22, 28–51.
  16. Mescon, M., Albert, M., & Khedouri, F. (2015). Management, Harpercollins College Div; Subsequent edition. Retrieved from: https://storage.googleapis.com/moteoasemiloslav.appspot.com/management-by-michael-h-mescon-1988–05-30-B01K2QU9B6.pdf (accessed: 17.09.2020).
  17. Moore, S., Daniel, M., Paquet, C., Dube, L., & Gauvin, L. (2009). Association of individual network social capital with abdominal adiposity, overweight and obesity. Journal of Public Health, 31 (1), 175–183.
  18. Qurniati, R., Febryano, I., & Zulfiani, D. (2017). How trust influence social capital to support collective action in agroforestry development? Retrieved from: https://www.smujo.id/biodiv/article/view/2044 (accessed: 14.09.2020).
  19. Рябоконь, І., & Мадяр, А. (2018). Якість трудового життя як фактор підвищення мотивації працівників на підприємствах [Ryabokon, I., & Madiar, A. (2018). Quality of working life as a factor in increasing employee motivation in enterprises]. Retrieved from: https://ir.kneu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/2010/26027/EP_40_2.pdf?sequence= 1&isAllowed=y (accessed: 17.09.2020).
  20. Social cohesion and social capital: Possible implications for the common good. Retrieved from: http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/vee/v35n3/01.pdf (accessed: 21.09.2020).
  21. Wenpin, T. (2017). Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), 70–83.
  22. Worrall, L., Cooper C., Kerrin M. (2016). The quality of working life. Retrieved from: https://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/the-quality-of-working-life-managerswellbeing-motivation-and-productivity/ (accessed: 17.09.2020).