What Do IP-intensive Businesses Have in Common with the Extractive Industry?
The place of excess (incl. windfall) profits in the DEMPE analysis for intangible assets*
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33119/ASCASP.2023.1.2Keywords:
windfall profit, economic crisis, transfer pricing, economic rent, residual profit, intellectual property, DEMPE, value creation, value capture, International taxation, income allocationAbstract
In this article, we touch upon one of the most topical and debatable loopholes in transfer pricing: how market distortions, dominant market power, and economic conditions that do not fit the normal economic cycle should affect transfer pricing analysis of controlled transactions. During the most recent economic crises triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy security crisis as consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, it became clear that business profits may not always be a direct result of investors’ decisions, or in transfer pricing terms – of functions performed, assets used, or risks assumed, but, instead, a consequence of external circumstances. Such external circumstances may include rapid distortions in the supply and demand equilibrium for certain goods or services, such as digital software or energy resources. Yet, some external factors are not connected to a stage of the economic cycle, among which there are the market power or distorted competition, i.e. oligopoly, monopoly, or a monopsony position in the market. In this article we observe that the ability of some sectors of the economy to capture abnormal returns is not a matter of luck or unpredictable events only. Instead, the ownership of certain scarce resources or artificially scarce assets determines the ability to generate excess (residual) returns. We build a parallel between the natural resources that produce economic rents and intellectual property assets, the scarcity of which is enabled by the strong system of legal protection of IP rights (in particular, patents) to demonstrate their common characteristic as rent-generating assets. We once again challenge the validity of the concept of value creation, arguing that it does not account for the level of competition, market power, and control and scarcity in the market, which are the main preconditions for a company to generate high profits. Finally, we challenge the mainstream concept of DEMPE for the allocation of profits from intangibles for the fact that it attributes too much value to the stage of development of intangibles. Based on the understanding that IP protection may induce artificial scarcity of IP protected products in the market, which distorts competition and enables the IP owner to receive higher returns, the market jurisdiction should be entitled to a share of the residual profit for the facilitation of the IP protection regime.
References
Acemoglu, C., & Robison, J.A. (2012). Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business.
Baunsgaard, M.T., & Vernon, N. (2022). Taxing Windfall Profits in the Energy Sector. International Monetary Fund.
Beer, S., De Mooij, R.A., Hebous, S., Keen, M.M., & Liu, M.L. (2020). Exploring residual profit allocation. International Monetary Fund.
Boadway, R., & Keen, M. (2010). Theoretical perspectives on resource tax design. In: The taxation of petroleum and minerals (pp. 29–90). Routledge.
Buriak, S., 2023 (forthcoming). International Taxation of Business Income in Globalised and Digitalised Economy: Non-equity modes of internationalisation of scalewithout-mass businesses and economic rents as residual profits. IBFD Doctoral Series.
Christophers, B. (2021). Class, assets, and work in rentier capitalism. Historical Materialism, 29(2), 3.
Cui, W., & Hashimzade, N. (2019). The digital services tax as a tax on location-specific rent. Available at SSRN 3488812.
Dernis, H., Gkotsis, P., Grassano, N., Nakazato, S., Squicciarini, M., van Beuzekom, B., & Vezzani, A. (2019). World corporate top R&D investors: Shaping the future of technologies and of AI (No. JRC117068). Joint Research Centre (Seville).
Devereux, M. P. et al. (2019). Residual profit allocation by income, WP 19/01. CBT Oxford.
Durand, C., & Milberg, W. (2020). Intellectual monopoly in global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 27(2), 404.
Hafkenscheid, R.P.F.M. (2017, Jan/Feb). The BEPS Report on Risk Allocation: Not so Functional. International Transfer Pricing Journal, 19–24.
Hebous, S., Prihardini, D., & Vernon, N. (2022). Excess Profit Taxes: Historical Perspective and Contemporary Relevance. International Monetary Fund.
Hieminga, G., & van Sante, M. (2022). The sectors most affected by soaring energy prices. Retrieved from: https://think.ing.com/articles/the-sectors-most-affected-bysoaring-energy-prices (accessed: 06/01/2023).
Hollinger, P., White, S., Speed, M., & Dunai, M. (2022). Will the energy crisis crush European industry? Financial Times. Retrieved from: https://www.ft.com/content/75ed449d-e9fd-41de-96bd-c92d316651da (accessed:06/01/2023).
Jiménez, A.M. (2020). Value Creation: A Guiding Light for the Interpretation of Tax Treaties? Bull. Intl. Taxn, 74(4/5).
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking Fast and Slow. Penguin Pockets.
Lemley, M.A. (2015). IP in a World without Scarcity. NyUL Rev., 90, 460.
Lepak, D.P., Smith, K.G., & Taylor, M.S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of management review, 32(1), 180.
Magalhães, T.D., & Christians, A. (2020). Rethinking tax for the digital economy after COVID-19. Harv. Bus. L. Rev. Online, 11, 1.
Mauboussin, M.J. (2012). The success equation: Untangling skill and luck in business, sports, and investing. Harvard Business Review Press.
Mazzucato, M. (2018). The Enterpreneurial State, Debunking Public versus Private Sector Myths. Penguin Books.
Mlodinow, L. (2008). The Drunkard’s Walk, How Randomness Rules Our Lives. Penguin Books.
Phelps, E.S. (1986). Profits Theory and Profits Taxation. International Monetary Fund.
Rikap, C. (2022). Amazon: A story of accumulation through intellectual rentiership and predation. Competition & Change, 26(3–4), 436.
Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., & Fleurbaey, M. (2020). Taxation of economic rents. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(2), 398.
Shay, S.E. (2021). The Deceptive Allure of Taxing “Residual Profits”, Bull. Intl. Taxn., 75(11/12).
Stratford, B. (2020). The threat of rent extraction in a resource-constrained future. Ecological economics, 169(106524), 1.
Topham, G. (2021). Fresh calls for a windfall tax on companies that prospered during Covid, The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/sep/20/fresh-calls-for-windfall-tax-oncompanies-that-prospered-during-covid (accessed: 06/01/2023).
Vodovic, L. (2022). Industries Most and Least Impacted by COVID-19 from a Probability of Default Perspective – January 2022 Update, S&P Global. Retrieved from:
https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/blog/industries-most-and-least-impacted-by-covid-19-from-a-probability-of-default-perspective-january-2022-update (accessed: 06/01/2023).
Wright, J., & Zhu, B. (2018). Monopoly rents and foreign direct investment in fixed assets. International Studies Quarterly, 62(2), 341.
Other resources:
HFS (2022). Tech sector got COVID-19 ‘windfall’ of $100 billion: HFS Research. Retrieved from: https://www.hfsresearch.com/news/tech-sector-got-covid-19-windfall-of-100-billion-hfs-research/ (accessed: 06/01/2023).
Luxembourg and Others v. Commission (Amazon) (2021), T-816/17 and T-318/18, GC Decision.
MarketWatch, Tritax Big Box REIC. Retrieved from: https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/4zq/company-profile?countrycode=de&iso=xfra (accessed: 06/01/2023).
OECD (2020). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Report on Pillar One Blueprint.
OECD (2022). Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations.
Sure Dividend Research for 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.suredividend.com
WHO Watch Team (2022). Private monopolies hinder progress on public health: intellectual property at the 75th World Health Assembly, PeoplesDispatch. Retrieved from: https://peoplesdispatch.org/2022/06/12/private-monopolies-hinder-progress-on-publichealth-intellectual-property-at-the-75th-world-healthassembly/ (accessed: 06/01/2023).
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-03-22 (2)
- 2023-08-31 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
Author agrees to share his work under CC-BY-NC license.