The Belt and Road Initiative and the Transformation of Globalization

Main Article Content

Biliang Hu

Abstract

Globalisation contributed to the economic, social, political and cultural development of the deve- loped and developing countries. At the same time, it had an adverse effect, which is in-creasing disparity of income between various social groups and countries. The continuation of such process will lead to the weakening of globalisation, so there is a need to transform globalisation. According to the Author, the initiative of China, entitled: New Belt and New Road is an example of such actions and will contribute to giving new impetus to the process of globalisation in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hu, B. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative and the Transformation of Globalization. Kwartalnik Nauk O Przedsiębiorstwie, 46(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.0999
Section
Articles

References

Barro R.I., Sala-i-Martin X. [1995], Economic Growth, New York, McGraw Hill.

Batholomew W.P.A., Kochanowski J.P. [1986], The Decline of Manufacturing in the Midwest: A shortrun or -long-run problem, “Indiana Business Review”, Vol. 7(12).

Beckfield J. [2006], European Integration and Income Inequality, “American Sociological Review”, Vol. 71(6), p. 964-985.

Bourguignon F. [2004], The Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations Working Papers, New Delhi.

Dollar D. [1992], Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 96 LDCs, 1976-1985, “Economic Development and Cultural Change”, p. 523-544.

Frankel J.A., Romer D.H. [1999], Does Trade Cause Growth?, “American Economic Review”, Vol. 89(3), p. 379-399.

Greenaway D., Morgan W., Wright P. [1998], Trade Reform, Adjustment and Growth: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?, “Economic Journal”, Vol. 108(450), p. 1547-1561.

Kolodko G.W. [2001], Globalization and Transformation: Illusions and Reality, TIGER Working Paper Series No. 1, Poland, Warsaw.

Kolodko G.W. [2014 a], The New Pragmatism, or economics and policy for the future, “Acta Oeconomica”, Vol. 64(2), p. 139-160

Kolodko G.W. [2014 b], Whither the World: The Political Economy of the Future, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire.

Meschi E., Vivarelli M. [2009], Trade and Income Inequality in Developing Countries, ”World Development”, Vol. 37(2), p. 287-302.

Modic S.J., Trautlein D.H. [1985], Perils of De-industrialization (Part 1). Where have all factories gone?”, “Industry Week”.

Neutel M., Heshmati A. [2006], Globalization, Inequality and Poverty Relationships: A Cross Country Evidence, IZA, Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Papers, 2223.

Nissanke M., Thorbecke E. [2008], Introduction: Globalization-Poverty Channels and Case Studies from Sub-Saharan Africa, “African Development Review”, No. 20(1).

Rodrik D. [2002], Institutions, Integration and Geography: In Search of the Deep Determinants of Economic Growth, Cambridge, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Mimeo.

Rudra N. [2004], Openness, Welfare Spending, and Inequality in the Developing World, “International Studies Quarterly”, Vol. 48(3), p. 683-709.

Sachs J.D, Warner A., Åslund A., et al. [1995], Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 1, p. 1-118.

Silva J.A., Leichenko R.M. [2004], Regional Income Inequality and International Trade, “Economic Geography”, Vol. 80(3), p. 261-286.

Stiglitz J.E. [2006], Making Globalization Work, US, W.W. Norton & Company.

Vamvakidis A. [1998], Regional Integration and Economic Growth, “World Bank Economic Review”, No. 12(2), p. 251-270.

World Bank [2017], Unemployment, International Labour Organization, ILOSTAT database, https:// data.worldbank.org, retrieved in March 2017.