Zrównoważone przedsiębiorstwo a kreowanie wartości dla akcjonariuszy
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Czy przedsiębiorstwa i akcjonariusze odnoszą wymierne korzyści z wdrożenia koncepcji zrównoważonego rozwoju przedsiębiorstwa? Badanie przeprowadzone przez autorów na wyselekcjonowanym zbiorze spółek wchodzących w skład indeksu S&P 500 w latach 2006-10 sugerują, że firmy i ich właściciele odnoszą korzyści z tytułu inwestycji w zrównoważony rozwój, poprzez wyższą wycenę firm na rynku kapitałowym oraz większą ich odpornością na kryzysy.
Downloads
Article Details
The author of the article declares that the submitted article does not infringe the copyrights of third parties. The author agrees to subject the article to the review procedure and to make editorial changes. The author transfers, free of charge, to SGH Publishing House the author's economic rights to the work in the fields of exploitation listed in the Article 50 of the Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights – provided that the work has been accepted for publication and published.
SGH Publishing House holds economic copyrights to all content of the journal. Placing the text of the article in a repository, on the author's home page or on any other page is allowed as long as it does not involve obtaining economic benefits, and the text will be provided with source information (including the title, year, number and internet address of the journal).
References
2. Boyle E.J., Higgins M.M., Rhee S.G., Stock market reaction to ethical initiatives of defense contractors: Theory and evidence, “Critical Perspectives in Accounting”, 1997, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 541-561. doi: 10.1006/cpac.1997.0124
3. Chitru F., Sharfman M., Uysal V., Does greenness matter? The effect of corporate environmental performance on ownership structure, analyst coverage and firm value, University of Oklahoma working paper, Oklahoma 2010.
4. Fisher-Vanden K., Thorburn K., Voluntary Corporate Environmental Initiatives and Shareholder Wealth, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. DP6698, CEPR 2008. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1324983
5. Johnsen B., Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 2003, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 219-222. doi: 10.1023/a:1022998232503
6. Kahn R.N., Lekander C., Leimkuhler T., Just Say No? The Investment Implications of Tobacco Divestiture, “The Journal of Investing”, 1997, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 62-70. doi: 10.3905/joi.1997.62
7. Majumdar S.K. and Marcus A.A., Rules versus Discretion: The Productivity Consequences of Flexible Regulations, “Academy of Management Journal”, 2001, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 170-179.
8. Margolis J., Elfenbein H., Do well by doing good: Don’t count on it, “Harvard Business Review”, 2008, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 19-20. doi: 10.2307/20081065
9. Reinhardt F.L, Environmental product differentiation: Implications for corporate strategy, “California Management Review”, 1998, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 43 -73. doi: 10.2307/41165964
10. Soppe A., Sustainable Corporate Finance, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 2004, Vol. 53, No. 1-2, pp. 213-224.
11. Soppe A., Sustainable Finance as a Connection Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Responsible Investing, “Indian Management Research Journal”, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 13-23.
12. Tirole J., Bénabou R., Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility, Working Paper No. 23, 2010, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milano. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1573694
13. Yin H., Schmeidler P., Why Do Standardized ISO 14001 Environmental. Management Systems Lead to Heterogeneous. Environmental Outcomes?, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, 2009, Vol. 18, pp. 469-486. doi: 10.1002/bse.629
14. Zaho J., The Effect of the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System on Corporate Financial Performance, “International Journal of Business Excellence”, 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1-2, pp. 210-230.