Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

Satisfaction with compensation for work in modern society, especially in welfare states, plays a very important role. It not only ensures the efficient use of available production facilities and natural resources, but also determines the size of the state budget, the quality of life in the country, an attitude towards emigration and the general state of social situation. In a market economy, wages are the expression of capital and labour relations, both at the national and at the company level. The compensation systems are also influenced by some external factors such as tax system, technological level, labour supply and demand balance and legal regulation. The article seeks to reveal how the satisfaction with pay for work affects the social changes in the country. The article present the results of the research carried out in Lithuania in 2017.

Słowa kluczowe

compensation remuneration work wages social changes Lithuania employment

Szczegóły artykułu

Jak cytować
Gruževskis, B., Sudnickas, T., & Urbanovič , J. (2018). Impact of Remuneration for Work on Social Changes in Lithuania. Edukacja Ekonomistów I Menedżerów, 49(3), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.7395

Referencje

    1. Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 226–299.
    2. Adams, J.S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 67, 422–436.
    3. Bassett‑Jones, N., Lloyd, G.C. (2005). Does Herzberg’s motivation theory have staying power? Journal of Management Development, 24(10), 929–943.
    4. Bloom, M. (2004). The Ethics of Compensation Systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(2), 149–152.
    5. Brooks, I. (2009). Organisational Behaviour – Individuals, Groups and Organisation. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.
    6. Chiang, C.H., Jang, S.C. (2008). An expectancy theory model for hotel employee motivation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2), 313–322.
    7. Diamond, P. (2011). Unemployment, Vacancies, Wages. American Economic Review, 101, 1045–1072.
    8. Eerde van, W., Henk, T. (1996). Vroom’s expectancy models and work‑related criteria: A meta‑analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 575–586.
    9. EMN (2017). European Migration Network Studies. The Effectiveness of Return in Lithuania: challenges and good practices linked to EU rules and standards. http://emn. lt/category/tyrimai/studijos/ (20.04.2018).
    10. ETUI (2015). Benchmarking. Working Europe. 2015. Brussels.
    11. EU (2018). Average Salary in European Union 2018. https://www.reinisfischer.com/average‑salary‑european‑union‑2018 (28.05.2018).
    12. Eurostat. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00114&plugin=1 (28.05.2018).
    13. Gruževskis, B., Brazienė, R. (2017). Nesaugus užimtumas ir jo pokyčių tendencijos /Precarious employment and trends of its change. Lietuvos socialinė raida, 6, 170–192.
    14. Herzberg, F. (1974). Motivation‑hygiene profiles: Pinpointing what ails the organization. Organizational Dynamics, 3(2), 18–29.
    15. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: how do you motivate employees. Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53–62.
    16. Herzberg, F. (1971). Work and the nature of man. New York: World Publishing.
    17. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Snyderman, B.B. (2005). The motivation to work. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
    18. Huseman, R.C., Hatfield, J.D., Miles, E.W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222–234.
    19. Lawler, E.E., Suttle, J.L. (1973). Expectancy Theory and Job Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9(3), 482–503.
    20. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.
    21. Lundberg, Ch., Gudmundson, A., Andersson, T.D. (2009). Herzberg’s Two‑Factor Theory of work motivation tested empirically on seasonal workers in hospitality and tourism. Tourism Management, 30(6), 890–899.
    22. Matei, M.C., Abrudan, M.M. (2016). Adapting Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory to the Cultural Context of Romania. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221(7), 95–104.
    23. OECD (2018). OECD Reviews of Labour Market and Social Policies, Lithuania. https:// read.oecd‑ilibrary.org/social‑issues‑migration‑health/oecd‑reviews‑of‑labour‑ market‑and‑social‑policies‑lithuania_9789264189935‑en#page4 (28.05.2018).
    24. Porter, L.W., Lawler, E.E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
    25. Shore, T.H. (2004). Equity sensitivity theory: do we all want more than we deserve? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(7), 722–728.
    26. Stankūnienė, V., Baublytė, M., Žibas, K., Stumbrys, D. (2016). Lietuvos demografinė kaita: ką atskleidžia gyventojų surašymai? (Demographic Change in Lithuania: What has the Censuses Revealed?). Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas: Kaunas.
    27. Story, P.A., Hart, J.W., Stasson, M.F., Mahoney, J.M. (2008). Using a two‑factor theory of achievement motivation to examine performance‑based outcomes and self‑regulatory processes. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 391–395.
    28. Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Witte De, H., Feather, N.T. (2005). Understanding unemployed people’s job search behavior, unemployment experience and well‑being: A comparison of expectancy‑value theory and self‑determination theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 268–286.
    29. Verslo žinios (2014). Atotrūkis tarp vadovų ir pavaldinių atlyginimų – vienas didžiausių (Hay group research on remuneration). https://www.vz.lt/archive/article/2014/3/31/atotrukis‑tarp‑vadovu‑ir‑pavaldiniu‑atlyginimu‑vienas‑didziausiu (21.03.2018)
    30. VPVI (2006). Lietuvos integracijos į ES poveikis kvalifikuotų Lietuvos viešojo sektoriaus darbuotojų išvykimui dirbti į užsienį (The Impact of Lithuanian Integration into the EU on Emigration of Skilled Staff of the Lithuanian Public Sector to Work Abroad). https://www.urm.lt/uploads/default/documents/uzienio_politika/ES/ ES_tyrimai/8_%20Darbo_rinka_santrauka.pdf (07.05.2018).
    31. Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
    32. Žibas, K., Lekavičiūtė, E. (2017). Darbo migracijos procesai Lietuvoje (Labor migration processes in Lithuania). Lietuvos socialinė raida, 6, 54–70.
    33. Žvalionytė, D. (2014). Grįžusių migrantų integracija kilmės šalies darbo rinkoje: Lietuvos atvejo analizė (The integration of return migrants in their home country’s labour market: Evidence from Lithuania). Daktaro disertacija (Doctoral thesis). Vilnius University: Vilnius.