Enterprise innovativeness - measures and models
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article discusses the measures and models of enterprises innovativeness developed by researchers representing branch economy. Firstly, the attention was given to the traditional measures of firm innovativeness, both input and output ones. Were presented its advantages and disadvantages. The next part of the study concentrates on firm innovativeness modern measures, which, among others, refer to the managerial concepts of open and networked innovation. Finally, the evolution of firm innovativeness models was discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
The author of the article declares that the submitted article does not infringe the copyrights of third parties. The author agrees to subject the article to the review procedure and to make editorial changes. The author transfers, free of charge, to SGH Publishing House the author's economic rights to the work in the fields of exploitation listed in the Article 50 of the Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights – provided that the work has been accepted for publication and published.
SGH Publishing House holds economic copyrights to all content of the journal. Placing the text of the article in a repository, on the author's home page or on any other page is allowed as long as it does not involve obtaining economic benefits, and the text will be provided with source information (including the title, year, number and internet address of the journal).
References
„Administrative Science Quarterly”, No. 45, pp. 425- 455.
2. Chesbrough H. [2003], Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from
Technology, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
3. Cohen W., Nelson R., Walsh J. [2000], Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions
and Why US Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not), NBER Working Paper.
4. Dosi G. [1988], Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation, „Journal of Economic
Literature”, No. 26, pp. 1120-1171.
5. Eris E., Saatcioglu O. [2006], A system look for technological innovation: firm based perspective,
EMCIS conference paper, July 6-7.
6. Golińska-Pieszyńska M. [2011], Polskie praktyki innowacyjne, Warszawa, Oficyna Wydawnicza
SGH.
7. Harryson S. [2006], Know-who Based Entrepreneurship: From Knowledge Creation to Business
Implementation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing.
8. Hellström T., Malmquist U. [2000], Networked innovation: developing the AXE110 mini-exchange
at Ericsson Journal, „European Journal of Innovation Management”, pp. 181-189.
9. Hult G., Hurley R., Knight G. [2004], Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance,
„Industrial Marketing Management”, No. 33, pp. 429-438.
10. Jackson M. [2010], Social and Economic Networks, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.
11. Kleinknecht A., Van Montfort K., Brouwe E. [2002], The non-trivial choice between innovation
indicators, „Economics of Innovation and New Technology”, No. 11.
12. Klette T., Kortum S. [2001], Innovating Firms: Evidence and Theory, working paper.
13. Milbergs E., Vonortas N. [2006], Innovation Metrics: Measurement to Insight, white paper for
National Innovation Initiative.
14. Morck R., Yeung B. [2000], The Economic Determinants of Innovation, Industry Canada Research
Publications, Occasional Paper Number 25.
15. Noga A. [2009], Teorie przedsiębiorstw, Warszawa, PWE.
16. Rosenberg N. [1982], Inside the black box. Technology and Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
17. Rothwell R. [1992], Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s, „R&D Management“,
No. 22, pp. 221- 240.
18. Schumpeter J. [1912], Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Leipzig, Dunker & Humblot.
19. Schumpeter J. [1939], Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist
Process, New York, McGraw-Hill.
20. Strzyżewska M. [2011], Współpraca między przedsiębiorstwami – odniesienie do polskiej praktyki,
Warszawa, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.