Prowzrostowe przedziały nierówności w krajach OECD
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Zarówno zbyt duże, jak i zbyt małe nierówności dochodowe obracają się przeciwko wzrostowi gospodarczemu. Bazując na tym ugruntowanym poglądzie w teorii ekonomii, autor podejmuje próbę określenia najkorzystniejszych przedziałów nierówności dla krajów OECD oraz szacuje prowzrostowe wartości współczynnika Giniego dla poszczególnych krajów.
Downloads
Article Details
The author of the article declares that the submitted article does not infringe the copyrights of third parties. The author agrees to subject the article to the review procedure and to make editorial changes. The author transfers, free of charge, to SGH Publishing House the author's economic rights to the work in the fields of exploitation listed in the Article 50 of the Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights – provided that the work has been accepted for publication and published.
SGH Publishing House holds economic copyrights to all content of the journal. Placing the text of the article in a repository, on the author's home page or on any other page is allowed as long as it does not involve obtaining economic benefits, and the text will be provided with source information (including the title, year, number and internet address of the journal).
References
2. Atkinson A., Economic Transformation in Eastern Europe and the Distribution of Income, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992.
3. Berg A., Ostry D., Inequality and Unsustainable Growth: Two sides of the same coin?, IMF, IMF Staff Discussion Note, SDN/11/8, 2011.
4. Deininger K., Squire L., New ways of looking at old issues: asset inequality and growth, “Journal of Development Economics”, 1998, LVII, Staff Discussion Note, SDN/11/08, 2011.
5. Guiuso L., Does Culture affect Economic outcomes?, “The Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 2006, 20(2), pp. 23-48.
6. Hoeller, P., Less Income Inequality and More Growth – Are They Compatible?, OECD Departaments Working Paper, 2012, No. 924.
7. Hofstede G., Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, New York 2010.
8. Kaldor N., Capital accumulation and economic growth, Free Press, Glencoe 1960.Google Scholar
9. Karl T., Economic Inequality and Democratic Instability, “Journal of Democracy”, 2000, Vol. 13, pp.149-156.
10. Kealble H., Thomas M., Income Distribution in Historical Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991.
11. Kołodko G.W., Wędrujący świat, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 2008.
12. Kołodko G.W., Dokąd zmierza świat? Ekonomia polityczna przyszłości, Prószyński i S-ka, Warszawa 2013.
13. Kumor P., Współzależność nierówności płac ze wzrostem gospodarczym w Polsce, „Wiadomości Statystyczne”, 2009, Nr 7, s. 10-28.
14. Malinoski M., On Culture and Income Inequality: Regression Analysis of Hofstede’s International Cultural Dimensions and Gini Coefficient, “Xavier Journal of Politics”, 2012, Vol. III, No. 1, pp. 32-48.
15. Milanovic B., Determinants of Cross-Country Income Inequality − An Augmented Kuznets Hypothesis, The World Bank Policy Research Department Working Papers, 2004.
16. Meltzer A., Richard S., A Rational Theory of the size of Government, “Journal of Political Economy”, 1981, 89 (4), pp. 914-927.
17. Oshima H., Kuznets Curve and Asian Income Distribution, [in:] Making Economies more efficient and more equitable: factors determining income distribution, Mozoguchi T. (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford 1991.
18. Rodrik D., Where did all the Growth go? External Shocks, Social Conflicts and Growth Collapses, “Journal of Economic Growth”, 1999, 4(4), pp. 385-412.
19. Stiglitz J., The Price of Inequality, W.W. Norton & Company, New York 2012.