Role and types of ESG ratings in the financial market

Main Article Content

Natalia Topczewska

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to discuss the role and types of ESG ratings in the financial market. Selected issues related to the integration of sustainability into mainstream risk management in the financial industry are presented. The following research hypotheses were formulated for the consideration undertaken in the article:
Hypothesis 1: Green bonds are increasingly important in the financial market both globally and in Europe.
Hypothesis 2: Investors use ESG ratings to confirm information on companies’ environmental, social and governance performance.
Hypothesis 3: ESG ratings from many providers are difficult to compare due to differing methodologies.
Achieving the research objective required a systematic review of the Polish and English-language literature using scientific information databases (CEJSH, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Connected Papers and arXiv), as well as professional sources in online format such as: Financial Times, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters. The paper uses descriptive and comparative analysis methods, as well as analysis and inference based on secondary data – published by the World Bank and the International Capital Markets Association. The growth of the sustainable debt (bond) market in terms of the volume of issued instruments of this type was identified. The results of the analyses also indicate a diversity of methodologies for assigning ESG ratings. In addition, addressing ESG issues appropriately can have a tangible impact on a company’s real-world business operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Topczewska, N. (2024). Role and types of ESG ratings in the financial market. Kwartalnik Nauk O Przedsiębiorstwie, 71(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.33119/KNoP.2024.71.1.3 (Original work published March 30, 2024)
Section
Articles

References

Bank Światowy [2023], Green, Social, and Sustainability (GSS) Bonds Market Update – July, https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/120fd7d4d02fb164e0d5c838dd067701-0340012023/original/GSSS-Quarterly-Newsletter-Issue-No-4.pdf (data dostępu: 18.09.2023).

Belsom T., Wagstaff E. [2023], An introduction to responsible investment, PRI, https://www.unpri.org/introductory-guides-to-responsible-investment/what-is-responsible-investment/4780.article (data dostępu: 6.09.2023).

CDP [b.d.], CDP scoring methodology guidance, https://www.cdp.net/en/scores/cdp-scoresexplained (data dostępu: 19.09.2023).

Cooke H. [2022], Investors ‘keep faith with ESG funds, „Financial Times”, June 24, https://www.ft.com/content/466d429b-e4bc-4e72‑b22b-459cf45516e3 (data dostępu: 2.09.2023).

Dubost C., Nuzzo S., Sullivan R., Woods I. [2023], ESG in credit ratings and ESG ratings, PRI, 6 March, https://www.unpri.org/credit-risk-and-ratings/esg-in-credit-ratings-and-esg-ratings/11071.article (data dostępu: 7.09.2023).

EcoVadis [b.d.], The World’s Most Trusted Business Sustainability Ratings, https://ecovadis.com/suppliers/ (data dostępu: 8.09.2023).

Fitch Ratings [b.d.], Ratings Criteria, https://www.fitchratings.com/criteria (data dostępu: 8.09.2023).

ISS [b.d.], ESG Corporate Ratings: Assess ESG Risks in Your Portfolio with Data-Driven & Analyst-Led ESG Ratings, https://www.issgovernance.com/esg/ratings/corporate-rating/ (data dostępu: 19.09.2023).

Jessop W., Wilkes T. [2023], Analysis: EU overhaul of ESG ratings industry rules has further to run, Reuters, June 16, https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/eu-overhaul-esg-ratings-industryrules-has-further-run-2023-06-15/ (data dostępu: 18.09.2023).

Międzynarodowe Stowarzyszenie Rynków Kapitałowych [b.d.], Sustainable bond market data, https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/sustainable-bonds-database/ (data dostępu: 15.09.2023).

Moody’s [b.d.], Rating Scale and Definitions, https://www.moodys.com/sites/products/productattachments/ap075378_1_1408_ki.pdf (data dostępu: 8.09.2023).

MSCI [2023], How does MSCI ESG Ratings work?, https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/esginvesting/esg-ratings (data dostępu: 8.09.2023).

Poh J. [2019], Conflicting ESG Ratings Are Confusing Sustainable Investors, Markets Family Office, 11 grudnia, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-11/conflicting-esg-ratings-areconfusing-sustainable-investors (data dostępu: 15.09.2023).

PRI [2023], Mapping the role sustainable bonds play in the fixed income market, 19 July, https://www.unpri.org/fixed-income/mapping-the-role-sustainable-bonds-play-in-the-fixed-incomemarket/11570.article (data dostępu: 7.09.2023).

Refinitiv [2023], Refinitiv ESG company scores, https://www.refinitiv.com/en/sustainable-finance/esg-scores (data dostępu: 19.09.2023).

S&P [2021], Ratings Criteria and models, https://disclosure.spglobal.com/ratings/en/regulatory/ratings-criteria (data dostępu: 8.09.2023).

S&P Global [2023], ESG Evaluation, https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/products-benefits/products/esg-evaluation (data dostępu: 8.09.2023).

Sustainable Fitch [2022], ESG Scores, https://www.sustainablefitch.com/products/esg-scores (data dostępu: 8.09.2023).

Sustainable Fitch [b.d.], About Second-Party Opinions (SPOs), https://www.sustainablefitch.com/products/second-party-opinions (data dostępu: 9.09.2023).

Sustainalytics [2023], Company ESG Risk Ratings. See ESG Risk Ratings for every company in our portfolio, right here, https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-ratings (data dostępu: 8.09.2023).

Sustainalytics [b.d.], Second-Party Opinions – Helping issuers bring green, social and sustainability bonds to market, https://www.sustainalytics.com/corporate-solutions/sustainable-finance-andlending/second-party-opinions (data dostępu: 9.09.2023).

World Bank [2021], What You Need to Know About Green Loans, October 4, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/10/04/what-you-need-to-know-about-green-loans (data dostępu: 7.02.2024).