Pasek boczny artykułu

Public Policy Studies
Pobieranie
PDF (English) EPUB (English) HTML (English)

Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

Współczesne badania dotyczące ruchu Fair Trade nie dają jasnej odpowiedzi, czy ogólny wpływ sprawiedliwego handlu jest pozytywny czy negatywny i jakie są rzeczywiste motywy konsumentów sprawiedliwego handlu. W artykule sprawdzamy, czy założenia wybranych szkół heterodoksyjnych (feministycznej, ekologicznej i humanistycznej) lepiej pasują do rzeczywistości ruchu Fair Trade niż założenia teorii neoklasycznej. Chociaż „lepsza kondycja” niekoniecznie oznacza „lepsze wyjaśnienie”, niezgodność z rzeczywistością może stanowić przeszkodę w identyfikacji kluczowego aspektu badanego zjawiska (tj. Sprawiedliwego handlu), szkodząc wyjaśnieniu jego istnienia i rozwoju.

Słowa kluczowe

ekonomia neoklasyczna ekonomia heterodoksyjna sprawiedliwy handel ubóstwo aktualne podejścia heterodoksyjne ekonomia feministyczna ekonomia społeczna neoclassical economics heterodox economics Fair Trade poverty current heterodox approaches feminist economics social economics

Szczegóły artykułu

Licencja

Czasopismo „Studia z Polityki Publicznej/Public Policy Studies” zapewnia dostęp do treści artykułów w trybie otwartego dostępu (Open Access) na zasadach licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0).

Licencja CC-BY

Więcej informacji: Polityka Open Access czasopisma "Studia z Polityki Publicznej/Public Policy Studies"

Jak cytować
Horodecka, A. . i Śliwińska, M. . (2019) „Fair Trade a ekonomia neoklasyczna i heterodoksyjna”, Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 6(3(23), s. 9–37. doi: 10.33119/KSzPP.2019.3.1.
Pobierz cytowania
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Metrics

Referencje

  1. Anderson, M. (2015). A History of Fair Trade in Contemporary Britain. From Civil Society Camoaigns to Corporate Compliance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Arnot, C. P., Boxall, C., Cash, S. B. (2006). Do Ethical Consumers Care About Price? A Revealed Preference Analysis of Fair Trade Coffee Purchases. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54 (4): 555–565.
  3. Bacon, C. (2005). Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty Coffee Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua?. World Development, 33 (3): 497–511.
  4. Bacon, C. et al. (2008). Are Sustainable Coffee Certifications Enough to Secure Farmer Livelihoods? The Millennium Development Goals and Nicaragua’s Fair Trade Cooperatives. Globalizations, 5(2): 259–274.
  5. Bäthge, S. (2015). Executive summary: Final report “Does Fair Trade Change Society?: TransFair e.V. (Fairtrade Deutschland).
  6. Becker, G.S. (1993). Der ökonomische Ansatz zur Erklärung menschlichen Verhaltens (Einheit der Gesellschaftswissenschaften). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
  7. Bergmann, B. (1987). Measurement’ Or Finding Things Out in Economics. Journal of Economic Education, 18(2), 191–201.
  8. Brockway, G.P.T. (2001). The End of Economic Man: An Introduction to Humanistic Economics. New York: W.W. Norton.
  9. Claar, V. (2010). Fair Trade?: Its Prospects as a Poverty Solution. Acton Institute.
  10. Colander, D., Holt, R., Rosser, B. (2004). The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics. Review of Political Economy, Taylor and Francis Journals, 16(4), 485–499.
  11. Collier, P. (2007). The Bottom Billion. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Costanza, R. (2001). Visions, values, valuation, and the need for an ecological economics. Bioscience, 51(6), 459–468.
  13. Dalvai, R. (2012). The Metamorphosis of Fair Trade. Fair World Project, 7–8. Retrieved from www.fairworldproject.org; [http://fairworldproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/FWP_Fall_publication_2012__Page_08–09.pdf
  14. Daly, H.E. (1997). Beyond growth: the economics of sustainable development. New York: Beacon Press.
  15. Daly, H.E., Farley, J. (2011). Ecological economics: principles and applications. Washington: Island Press.
  16. De Janvry, A., McIntosh, C., Sadoulet, E. (2012). Fair Trade and Free Entry: Can a Disequilibrium Market Serve as a Development Tool? Unpublished paper, Berkeley: University of California.
  17. Dodds, S. (1997). Towards a ‘science of sustainability’: Improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being. Ecological Economics, 23(2), 95–111. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0921–8009(97) 00047–5
  18. Dragusanu, R., Giovannucci, D., Nunn, N. (2014). The Economics of Fair Trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 217–236.
  19. Dragusanu, R., Nunn, N. (2014). The Impacts of Fair Trade Certification: Evidence from Coffee Producers in Costa Rica. http://scholar.harvard.edu/nunn/publications /impacts-fair-tradecertification-evidence-coffee -producers-costa-rica
  20. Duchin, F. (1998). Structural Economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  21. Fairtrade International. https://www.fairtrade.net
  22. Ferber, M.A., Nelson, J.A. (1993). Beyond economic man: feminist theory and economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  23. Ferber, M.A., Nelson, J.A. (2003). Feminist Economics Today. Beyond Economic Man. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  24. Forstater, M. (2004). Visions and scenarios: Heilbroner’s worldly philosophy, Lowe’s political economics, and the methodology of ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 51 (1–2): 17–30.
  25. Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7): 739–755.
  26. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R. (1994). The Worth of a Songbird: Ecological Economics as a Postnormal Science. Ecological Economics, 10(3): 197–207. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921–8009(94)90108–2
  27. Hainmueller, J., Hiscox, J.M., Sequeira, S. (2011). Consumer Demand for the Fair Trade Label: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Unpublished paper.
  28. Hewitson, G.J. (1999). Feminist economics; interrogating the masculinity of rational economic man. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  29. Hiscox, M.J., Broukhim, M., Litwin C.S. (2011). Consumer Demand for Fair Trade: New Evidence from a Field Experiment using eBay Auctions of Fresh Roasted Coffee. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1811783.
  30. Homann, K., Blome-Drees, F. (1992). Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht.
  31. Horodecka, A. (2015c). The impact of the human nature concepts on the goal of humanistic economics and religious motivated streams of economics (Buddhist, Islam and Christian).
  32. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali. Vita e Pensiero, Pubblicazioni dell’Universita’ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 123(4): 413–445. doi:RePEc:vep:journl:y:2015: v:131: i:4: p:413–445
  33. Horodecka, A. (2016). The Impact of the Concepts of Human Nature on the Methodology of Humanistic Economics and Religious Motivated Streams of Economics (Buddhist,
  34. Islam and Christian). In: M.H. Bilgin, H. Danis (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, vol. 2, Proceedings of the 15th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (pp. 515–545). London: Springer.
  35. Horodecka, A. (2017b). The methodology of evolutionary and neoclassical economics as a consequence of the changes in the concept of human nature. Argumenta Oeconomica, 39(2), 129–166. doi:10.15611/aoe.2017.2.06
  36. Horodecka, A., Vozna, L. (2017). A new paradigm of economic policy based on the synthesis of orthodox and heterodox economics Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics / Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 489: 137–148.
  37. doi:DOI: 10.15611/pn.2017.489.12
  38. Hwang, K., Kim, H. (2018). Are Ethical Consumers Happy? Effects of Ethical Consumers’ Motivations Based on Empathy Versus Self-orientation on Their Happiness, Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 579–598.
  39. Jastrzębska, E. (2012). Korporacje transnarodowe a Fair Trade. Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego Studia i Prace / Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 4: 29–49.
  40. Jo, T.-H. (2011). Social Provisioning Process and Socio-Economic Modeling. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(5): 1094–1116. doi:DOI: 10.1111/j.1536–7150.2011.00808.x
  41. Kaja, J. (2015). Eseje o Japonii i metodologii deskryptywnej. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  42. Lutz, M.A., Lux, K. (1979). The challenge of humanistic economics. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Pub. Co.
  43. Lutz, M.A., Lux, K. (1988). Humanistic economics: the new challenge. New York, NY: Bootstrap Press.
  44. Maslow, A. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4): 370–396.
  45. Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. New York and London: Apex Press.
  46. Meadows, D. (1996). Envisioning a sustainable world. In R. Costanza, O. Segura, J. MartinezAlier (Eds.), Getting Down to Earth. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  47. Méndez, V.E. et al. (2010). Effects of Fair Trade and Organic Certifications on Small-Scale Coffee Farmer House- holds in Central America and Mexico. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 25(3): 236–51.
  48. Nelson, J.A. (2001). Economic methodology and feminist critiques. Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1): 93–97. doi:10.1080/13501780010023252
  49. Nicholls, A., Opal, C. (2005). Fair Trade: Market-Driven Ethical Consumption. London: Sage Publications.
  50. Oliveira, T.D. (2018). From Modelmania to Datanomics: The Top Journals and the Quest for Formalization. STOREP Conference 2018 – Whatever Has Happened to Political Economy? Università di Genova, June 28, 2018 – June 30, 2018.
  51. Power, M. (2004). Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics. Feminist Economics, 10(3): 3–19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000267608
  52. Prugh, T., Costanza, R., Daly, H.E. (2000). The Local Politics of Global Sustainability. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  53. Restakis, J. (1991). Humanizing the Economy. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
  54. Rost, N. (2008). Homo oeconomicus. Eine Fiktion der Standardökonomie. Zeitschrift für Sozialökonomie, 45 (158–159): 50–58.
  55. Sáenz-Segura, F., Zúñiga-Arias, G. (2009). Assessment of the Effect of Fair Trade on Smallholder Producers in Costa Rica: A Comparative Study in the Coffee Sector. The Impact of Fair
  56. Trade, edited by Ruerd Ruben: 117–135. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
  57. Schmelzer, M. (2007). Fair Trade – In or Against the Market? Dreigliederung, Institut fuer Soziale, www.threefolding.org/essays/2007–01–001.html (15.06.2018).
  58. Schneider, G., Shackelford, J. (2001). Economics standards and lists: Proposed antidotes for feminist economists. Feminist Economics, 7(2): 77–89.
  59. Schumacher, E.F. (1973). Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered. London: Blond and Briggs.
  60. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Knopf.
  61. Sen, A. (2008). Capability and Well-Being. In D. Hausman (Ed.), The Philosophy of Economics (pp. 270–293). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  62. Siebenhüner, B. (2000). Homo sustinens — towards a new conception of humans for the science of sustainability. Ecological Economics, 32(1): 15–25. doi:10.1016/S0921–8009(99)00111–1x
  63. Svendsen, G.T., Svendsen, G.L.H. (2009). Handbook of social capital: The troika of sociology, political science and economics. Cheltenham: Elgar.
  64. Śliwińska, M. (2018). Geneza i kierunki rozwoju ruchu Fair Trade. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 372: 20–34.
  65. Walton, A. (2010). What is Fair Trade? Third World Quaterly, 31(3): 431–447.
  66. Weber, J. (2011). How Much More Do Growers Receive for Fair Trade-Organic Coffee?. Food Policy, 36(5): 678–85.
  67. World Fair Trade Organization (WFTO). https://wfto.com