Pasek boczny artykułu

Pobieranie
PDF (English) EPUB (English) HTML (English)

Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

W niniejszym opracowaniu wykorzystano studia przypadków do omówienia znaczenia informacji, dezinformacji i ewolucji danych naukowych w ramach rozwoju polityki zdrowia publicznego wobec pandemii COVID-19. Dwa obszary rozwoju tej polityki publicznej koncentrują się na 1) ryzyku i środkach ostrożności w zakresie zdrowia publicznego (np. nakazach noszenia masek, protokołach higienicznych i dystansowaniu społecznym) oraz 2) ryzyku i polityce gospodarczej/turystycznej (np. zamknięciu gospodarek regionalnych, ograniczeniu podróży, zamknięciu granic). Kluczowe w prezentowanej analizie jest zrozumienie procesu powstawania ryzyka społecznego i zaufania publicznego do instytucji i osób w ramach tych instytucji, które tworzą politykę publiczną z myślą o nagłych przypadkach, sytuacjach przejściowych i długotrwałych. Artykuł kończy się rekomendacjami dotyczącymi zwiększania zaufania publicznego do instytucji rządowych i zarządzania ryzykiem w okresach katastrof, kryzysów i pandemii.

Słowa kluczowe

katastrofy społeczeństwo ryzyka polityka publiczna incydenty krytyczne COVID-19 disasters risk society public policy critical incidents COVID-19

Szczegóły artykułu

Licencja

Czasopismo „Studia z Polityki Publicznej/Public Policy Studies” zapewnia dostęp do treści artykułów w trybie otwartego dostępu (Open Access) na zasadach licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0).

Licencja CC-BY

Więcej informacji: Polityka Open Access czasopisma "Studia z Polityki Publicznej/Public Policy Studies"

Jak cytować
Davis Bivens, N. i Miller, D. S. (2022) „Polityka publiczna wobec tymczasowego kryzysu lub trwałej zmiany strukturalnej w dobie katastrof, kryzysów i pandemii”, Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 9(3(35), s. 9–27. doi: 10.33119/KSzPP/2022.3.1.
Pobierz cytowania
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Metrics

Referencje

  1. Aarhus Kommune (2020). Joint Municipal Procurement of Protective Equipment, https://www.aarhus.dk/corona/faelleskommunalt-indkoeb-af-vaernemidler/ (accessed: 29.04.2022).
  2. Bea, K., Halchin, E., Hogue, H., Kaiser, F., McCarthy, F. X., Keegan, N., Reese, S., Schwemle, B. (2006). Federal emergency management policy changes after Hurricane Katrina: A summary of statutory provisions. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
  3. Birkland, T. A., Warnement, M. K. (2015). Focusing events in disasters and development. In: N. Kapucu, K. T. Liou (Eds.), Disaster and development: Examining global issues and cases (pp. 39-60). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
  4. Bullock, J. A., Haddow, G. D., Coppola, D. P. (2021). Introduction to emergency management (7th ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterwoth-Heinemen.
  5. Bullock, J. A., Haddow, G. D., Coppola, D. P. (2020). Introduction to homeland security (6th ed). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  6. Capano, G. (2020). Policy design and statue capacity in the COVID-19 emergency in Italy: If you are not prepared for the (un) expected, you can be only what you already are. Policy and Society, 39 (3): 326-344. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1783790
  7. Capano, G., Howlett, M. Jarvis, D., Ramesh, M. (2022). Long-term policy impacts of the coronavirus: normalization, adaptation, and acceleration in the post-COVID state. Policy and Society, 41 (1): 1-12. DOI: 10.1093/polsoc/puab018
  8. City of New Orleans Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (2015). Hazard mitigation plan city of New Orleans. New Orleans, LA: City of New Orleans.
  9. Conference of Cantonal Governments (KDK) (2020). Press release of the KDK "Joining forces against the Covid-19 pandemic", https://kdk.ch/uploads/media/MM-4034-20200327-PVKdK-COVID-19-FR.pdf (accessed: 29.04.2022).
  10. Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol, 11: article 100. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100.
  11. Cutter, S. L., Gall, M. (2006). Hurricane Katrina: A failure of planning or a planned failure? In: C. Felgentreff, T. Glade (Eds.), Naturrisiken und sozialkatastrophen (Natural disasters hazards and social disasters) (pp. 353-366). New York, NY: Springer Spectrum.
  12. Davis Bivens, N., Meade Byrd, Y. (2020). Navigating internships and field experience in the wake of a global pandemic: A qualitative examination of two undergraduate program experiences. Journal of Education and Social Policy, 7 (3): 78-86.
  13. de Jesus, O. F. (2015). The national plan of education and the financial difficulties to implement it. Eccos Scientific Journal, 36: 103-115.
  14. Daoust, J. F. (2020). Elderly people and responses to COVID-19 in 27 Countries. Plos ONE, 15 (7): e0235590. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235590
  15. Director of National Intelligence (2022). USA PATRIOT Act. Director of National Intelligence, https://www.dni.gov/index.php/who-we-are/organizations/ise/ise-archive/ise-additional-resources/2116-usa-patriot-act (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  16. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2008). National response framework. Washington, DC: United States Department of Homeland Security.
  17. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2016). National response framework (3 rd ed.). Washington, DC: United States Department of Homeland Security.
  18. Garrett, T. A. (2007). Effects of the 1918 Influenza Pandemic: Implications for a modern-day pandemic. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
  19. Goodman, M. P., Seigel, S., Sobel, M. (2020). Assessing the G20 virtual summit. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  20. Hsiang, S., Allen, D., Annan-Phan, S., Bell, K., Bolliger, I., Chong, T., Druckenmiller, H., Huang, L. Y., Hultgren, A., Krasovich, E., Lau, P., Lee, J., Rolf, E., Tseng, J., Wu, T. (2020). The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature, 584: 262-267. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8
  21. Islam, N., Sharp, S. J., Chowell, G., Shabnam, S., Kawachi, I., Lacey, B., Massaro, J. M., D'Agostino, R. B., White, M. (2020). Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019: Natural experiment in 149 countries. British Medical Journal, 370: m2743. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2743
  22. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  23. Leslie, L. (2014). Beyond policy analysis - Public issue management in turbulent times (5th ed.). Scarborough, ON: Nelson Education.
  24. Levitt, J. I., Walker, M. C. (2009). Truth crushed to earth will rise again. In: J. I. Levitt, M. C. Walker (Eds.). Hurricane Katrina: America's unnatural disaster (pp. 2-21). Oxfordshire, UK: Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
  25. Maunder, R. G., Leszcz, Savage M., D., Adam, M. A., Peladeau, N., Romano, D., Rose, M., Schulman, R. B. (2008). Applying the lessons of SARS to pandemic influenza. An evidence-based approach to mitigating the stress experienced by healthcare workers. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 99 (6): 486-488. DOI: 10.1007/BF03403782
  26. Mead, R. A. (2006) St. Rita's and lost causes: Improving nursing home emergency preparedness. Marquette Elder's Advisor, 7 (2): 153-201.
  27. Menzel, D. C. (2006). The Katrina aftermath: A failure of federalism or leadership? Public Administration Review, 66 (6): 808-812.
  28. Migone, A. R. (2020). The influence of national policy characteristics on COVID-19 containment policies: a comparative analysis. Policy Design and Practice, 3 (3): 259-276. DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2020.1804660
  29. Miller, D. S. (2022). Preface: Security, technology, and travel in an age of crisis management. In: S. Moaco (Ed.), Travel, safety, and COVID-19: Security, digitization, and tourist behaviour (pp. ix-xviii). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  30. Miller, D. S. (2016). Public trust in the aftermath of natural and na-technological disasters: Hurricane Katrina and the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Incident. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36 (5/6): 410-431.
  31. Miller, D. S., Davis Bivens, N. (2022). Risk society in the age of pandemics: Disaster reporting in the media - Ebola and COVID-19. In: J. C. Pollock, D. A. Vakoch, (Eds.), COVID-19 in International Media: Global pandemic perspectives. (pp. 234-248). London, UK: Routledge.
  32. Miller, D. S., Wesley, N. (2016). Toxic disasters, biopolitics and corrosive communities: Guiding principles in the quest for healing in Flint, Michigan. Environmental Justice, 9 (3): 69-75.
  33. Mintrom, M., O'Connor, R. (2020). The importance of policy narrative: Effective government responses to Covid-19. Policy Design and Practice, 3 (3): 205-227. DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2020.1813358
  34. New York State (2020). Pennsylvania Joins New York, New Jersey and Connecticut's Regional Coalition to Combat COVID-19, https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/pennsylvania-joins-new-york-new-jersey-and-connecticuts-regional-coalition-combat-covid-19 (accessed: 29.04.2022).
  35. O'Sullivan, T. L., Phillips, K. P. (2019). From SARS to pandemic influenza: The framing of high-risk populations. Natural Hazards, 98 (1): 103-117. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-019-03584-6
  36. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2020a). From pandemic to recovery: Local employment and economic development, https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=130_130810-m60ml0&s4wf&title=From-pandemic-to-recovery-Local-employment-and-economic-development (accessed: 29.04.2022).
  37. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2020b). The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of government, https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=128_128287-5agkkojaaa&title=The-territorial-impact-of-covid-19-managing-the-crisis-across-levels-of-government (accessed: 29.04.2022).
  38. Perl, Raphael (2001). Terrorism, the Future, and U. S. Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: The Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.
  39. Rose-Redwood, R., Kitchin, R., Apostolopoulou, E., Rickards, L., Blackman, T., Crampton, J., Rossi, U., Buckley, M. (2020). Geographies of the COVID-19 pandemic. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10 (2): 97-106. DOI: 10.1177/2043820620936050
  40. Schneider, S. K. (1992). Governmental response to disasters: The conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Administration Review, 52 (2): 135-145.
  41. Schneider, A., Ingram, H. (1993). Construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87 (2): 334-34.
  42. Scott, S., McSpirit, S., Breheny, P., Howell, B. (2012). The long-term effects of a coal waste disaster on social trust. Appalachian Kentucky. Organization and Environment 25 (4): 402-418.
  43. Shaughnessy, T. M., White, M. L. Brendler, M. D. (2010). The income distribution effect of natural disasters: An analysis of Hurricane Katrina. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 40 (1): 84-95.
  44. Solnit, R. (2009). A paradise built in hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disasters. New York, NY: Viking.
  45. Stuckey, M. E., Genovese, M. A., Jarvis, S. E., Smith, C. A., Smith, C. R., Spitzer, R., Zaeske, S. M. (2008). Report of the National Task Force on Presidential Communication to Congress. In: J. A. Aune, M. J. Medhurst (Eds.), The prospect of presidential rhetoric. (pp. 272-292). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
  46. Sylves, R. (2006). President Bush and Hurricane Katrina: A presidential leadership study. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604 (1): 26-56.
  47. Taylor, R. W., Swanson, C. R. (2016). Terrorism, intelligence, and homeland security. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice.
  48. Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality (2020). Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality's Response to the COVID-19: Updating Document, https://covidnews.eurocities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Tel-Aviv-overview.pdf (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  49. Toshkov, D., Carroll, B., Yesilkagit, K. (2021). Government capacity, societal trust or party preferences: what accounts for the variety of national policy responses to the COVID- 19 pandemic in Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 29(7): 1009-1028. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1928270
  50. United States Department of Homeland Security (2004). National response plan. United States Department of Homeland Security, https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=450766 (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  51. Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., Sabatier, P. A. (2011). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Science, 45: 1-21.
  52. White House Archives (2008). Homeland Security. George Bush White House, https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/homeland/index.html (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  53. National Geographic (2015, August 29). Charts show how Hurricane Katrina changed New Orleans. National Geographic Society, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/150828-data-points-how-hurricane-katrina-changed-new-orleans (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  54. Robbins, R. (2020, March 7). STAT's guide to healthcare conferences disrupted by the coronavirus. STAT, https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/07/stats-guide-health-care-conferences-disrupted-covid-19/ (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  55. Ettlinger, M., Hensley, J. (2020, June 19). COVID-19 economic crisis: By state. University of New Hampshire Carsey School of Public Policy, https://carsey.unh.edu/COVID-19-Economic-Impact-By-State (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  56. Subramaniam, T., Hickey, C. (2020, September 16). Timeline: Charting Trump's public comments on Covid-19 vs. what he told Woodward in private. CNN, https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/09/politics/coronavirus-trump-woodward-timeline/ (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  57. WHO (World Health Organization) (2021, July 21). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. World Health Organization, https://covid19.who.int (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  58. New York Times, (2021, August 3, 2021). Coronavirus in the US: Latest map and case count. New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/covid-cases.html (accessed: 17.01.2022).
  59. Baldwin, R., di Mauro, B. W. (2020). Introduction. In: R. Baldwin, B. W. di Mauro (Eds.), Economics in the time of COVID-19 (pp. 1-30). London, UK: Center for Economic Policy Research.