Pasek boczny artykułu
Treść głównego artykułu
Abstrakt
Celem badań opisanych w artykule jest identyfikacja aktorów, uczestników dyskursu publicznego uwzględnianych w badaniach stosujących podejście instytucjonalizmu dyskursywnego. Z tego względu główne pytania badawcze to: które rodzaje aktorów wyszczególnia się najczęściej w dyskursie publicznym? Jakie są ich rzeczywiste konfiguracje, czyli z kim dane grupy aktorów najczęściej współwystępują? Jakie źródła informacji wykorzystuje się do opisu ich udziału w dyskursie publicznym? Odpowiedzi na te pytania są udzielone na podstawie analizy artykułów zidentyfikowanych w wyniku systematycznego przeglądu literatury, w których wiodącą metodologią badawczą jest instytucjonalizm dyskursywny stosowany do badania polityk publicznych. Wartością dodaną artykułu jest identyfikacja najczęściej badanej konfiguracji aktorów dyskursu publicznego i określenie głównego dyskursu (koordynacyjnego i komunikacyjnego).
Słowa kluczowe
dyskurs publiczny
instytucjonalizm dyskursywny
aktorzy
systematyczny przegląd literatury
Szczegóły artykułu
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Marek Ćwiklicki, Anna Mirzyńska
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Czasopismo „Studia z Polityki Publicznej/Public Policy Studies” zapewnia dostęp do treści artykułów w trybie otwartego dostępu (Open Access) na zasadach licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0).
Więcej informacji: Polityka Open Access czasopisma "Studia z Polityki Publicznej/Public Policy Studies"
Jak cytować
Ćwiklicki, M. i Mirzyńska, A. (2024) „Rodzaje aktorów w dyskursie publicznym. Perspektywa instytucjonalizmu dyskursywnego”, Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 11(1(41), s. 67–88. doi: 10.33119/KSzPP/2024.1.4.
Referencje
-
Alasuutari, P. (2015). The Discursive Side of New Institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805
Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as Discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300050005493
Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education explorations in sociology. Routledge. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781136670527
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565
Beblavý, M., Sičáková-beblavá, E., & Bačová, B. (2022). A Conceptual Framework for Understanding and Measuring The Transparency of Public Policy. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, 54(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2022.54.2.4
Bell, S. (2011). Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000147
Brunswicker, S., Pujol Priego, L., & Almirall, E. (2019). Transparency in policy making: A complexity view. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.005
Buijs, A., Kamphorst, D., Mattijssen, T., van Dam, R., Kuindersma, W., & Bouwma, I. (2022). Policy discourses for reconnecting nature with society: The search for societal engagement in Dutch nature conservation policies. Land Use Policy, 114, 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105965
Cairney, P., & Wellstead, A. (2020). COVID-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466
Campbell, J., & Pedersen, O. (2001). Introduction. W J. Campbell & O. Pedersen, The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (s. 1–24). Princeton University Press.
Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
Curran, D., Gillanders, R., & Mahmalat, M. (2022). Policymaking, Ideational Power and the Role of the Media. Political Studies Review, 20(2), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920968348
Fairbrass, J. (2011). Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility Policy in the European Union: A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis*: EXPLORING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 949–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02162.x
Gasper, D., & Apthorpe, R. (1996). Discourse Analysis and Policy Discourse. The European Journal of Development Research, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819608426650
Hajer, M. (2002). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain. W F. Fischer & J. Forester (Red.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (s. 51–84). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822381815-007
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Joosen, R., Haverland, M., & de Bruijn, E. (2022). Shaping EU agencies’ rulemaking. Comparative European Politics, 20(4), 411–442. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00268-z
Louwerse, T., & Otjes, S. (2018). How Populists Wage Opposition: Parliamentary Opposition Behaviour and Populism in Netherlands: Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718774717
Mair, P. (2001). Searching for the positions of political actors: A review of approaches and a critical evaluation of expert surveys. W M. Laver (Red.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors (s. 10–31). Taylor & Francis.
Majone, G. (2004). Dowody, argumenty i perswazja w procesie politycznym. Naukowe PWN.
Margetts, H. (2011). The Internet and Transparency. The Political Quarterly, 82(4), 518–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02253.x
Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00090
Ortega Alvarado, I. A., Sutcliffe, T. E., Berker, T., & Pettersen, I. N. (2021). Emerging circular economies: Discourse coalitions in a Norwegian case. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.011
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2000). Values and discourse in the politics of adjustment. W V. Schmidt Ann & F. Scharpf V., Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness (s. 229–309). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2002). Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002002
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2008). ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(303–326). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(01), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2015). ‘Forgotten Democratic Legitimacy: ‘Governing by the Rules’ and ‘Ruling by the Numbers‘. W M. Matthijs & M. Blyth, The Future of the Euro (s. 90–116). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2016). Reinterpreting the rules ‘by stealth’ in times of crisis: A discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission. West European Politics, 39, 1032–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2017). Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas. Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
Tellmann, S. M. (2016). Experts in public policymaking: Influential, yet constrained. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
Tretiak, O., Negodchenko, V., Dniprovskii University of the Humanities, Toryanyk, V., Dniprovskii University of the Humanities, Cap, A., & University of Prešov in Prešov. (2019). Economic policy-makers and economic experts in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe: Ways of interaction. Economic Annals-ХХI, 175(1–2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V175-02
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.
Wegmann, S. (2020). Policy-making power of opposition players: A comparative institutional perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. https://www-1tandfonline-1com-15m95kya3001c.hanbg.uek.krakow.pl/doi/abs/10.1080/13572334.2020.1843233
Referencje
Alasuutari, P. (2015). The Discursive Side of New Institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805
Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as Discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300050005493
Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education explorations in sociology. Routledge. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781136670527
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565
Beblavý, M., Sičáková-beblavá, E., & Bačová, B. (2022). A Conceptual Framework for Understanding and Measuring The Transparency of Public Policy. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, 54(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2022.54.2.4
Bell, S. (2011). Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000147
Brunswicker, S., Pujol Priego, L., & Almirall, E. (2019). Transparency in policy making: A complexity view. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.005
Buijs, A., Kamphorst, D., Mattijssen, T., van Dam, R., Kuindersma, W., & Bouwma, I. (2022). Policy discourses for reconnecting nature with society: The search for societal engagement in Dutch nature conservation policies. Land Use Policy, 114, 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105965
Cairney, P., & Wellstead, A. (2020). COVID-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466
Campbell, J., & Pedersen, O. (2001). Introduction. W J. Campbell & O. Pedersen, The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (s. 1–24). Princeton University Press.
Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
Curran, D., Gillanders, R., & Mahmalat, M. (2022). Policymaking, Ideational Power and the Role of the Media. Political Studies Review, 20(2), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920968348
Fairbrass, J. (2011). Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility Policy in the European Union: A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis*: EXPLORING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 949–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02162.x
Gasper, D., & Apthorpe, R. (1996). Discourse Analysis and Policy Discourse. The European Journal of Development Research, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819608426650
Hajer, M. (2002). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain. W F. Fischer & J. Forester (Red.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (s. 51–84). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822381815-007
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Joosen, R., Haverland, M., & de Bruijn, E. (2022). Shaping EU agencies’ rulemaking. Comparative European Politics, 20(4), 411–442. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00268-z
Louwerse, T., & Otjes, S. (2018). How Populists Wage Opposition: Parliamentary Opposition Behaviour and Populism in Netherlands: Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718774717
Mair, P. (2001). Searching for the positions of political actors: A review of approaches and a critical evaluation of expert surveys. W M. Laver (Red.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors (s. 10–31). Taylor & Francis.
Majone, G. (2004). Dowody, argumenty i perswazja w procesie politycznym. Naukowe PWN.
Margetts, H. (2011). The Internet and Transparency. The Political Quarterly, 82(4), 518–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02253.x
Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00090
Ortega Alvarado, I. A., Sutcliffe, T. E., Berker, T., & Pettersen, I. N. (2021). Emerging circular economies: Discourse coalitions in a Norwegian case. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.011
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2000). Values and discourse in the politics of adjustment. W V. Schmidt Ann & F. Scharpf V., Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness (s. 229–309). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2002). Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002002
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2008). ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(303–326). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(01), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2015). ‘Forgotten Democratic Legitimacy: ‘Governing by the Rules’ and ‘Ruling by the Numbers‘. W M. Matthijs & M. Blyth, The Future of the Euro (s. 90–116). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2016). Reinterpreting the rules ‘by stealth’ in times of crisis: A discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission. West European Politics, 39, 1032–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2017). Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas. Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
Tellmann, S. M. (2016). Experts in public policymaking: Influential, yet constrained. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
Tretiak, O., Negodchenko, V., Dniprovskii University of the Humanities, Toryanyk, V., Dniprovskii University of the Humanities, Cap, A., & University of Prešov in Prešov. (2019). Economic policy-makers and economic experts in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe: Ways of interaction. Economic Annals-ХХI, 175(1–2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V175-02
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.
Wegmann, S. (2020). Policy-making power of opposition players: A comparative institutional perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. https://www-1tandfonline-1com-15m95kya3001c.hanbg.uek.krakow.pl/doi/abs/10.1080/13572334.2020.1843233
Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as Discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300050005493
Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education explorations in sociology. Routledge. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781136670527
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565
Beblavý, M., Sičáková-beblavá, E., & Bačová, B. (2022). A Conceptual Framework for Understanding and Measuring The Transparency of Public Policy. Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, 54(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2022.54.2.4
Bell, S. (2011). Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change? British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000147
Brunswicker, S., Pujol Priego, L., & Almirall, E. (2019). Transparency in policy making: A complexity view. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.005
Buijs, A., Kamphorst, D., Mattijssen, T., van Dam, R., Kuindersma, W., & Bouwma, I. (2022). Policy discourses for reconnecting nature with society: The search for societal engagement in Dutch nature conservation policies. Land Use Policy, 114, 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105965
Cairney, P., & Wellstead, A. (2020). COVID-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466
Campbell, J., & Pedersen, O. (2001). Introduction. W J. Campbell & O. Pedersen, The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (s. 1–24). Princeton University Press.
Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
Curran, D., Gillanders, R., & Mahmalat, M. (2022). Policymaking, Ideational Power and the Role of the Media. Political Studies Review, 20(2), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920968348
Fairbrass, J. (2011). Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility Policy in the European Union: A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis*: EXPLORING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 949–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02162.x
Gasper, D., & Apthorpe, R. (1996). Discourse Analysis and Policy Discourse. The European Journal of Development Research, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819608426650
Hajer, M. (2002). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain. W F. Fischer & J. Forester (Red.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (s. 51–84). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822381815-007
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Joosen, R., Haverland, M., & de Bruijn, E. (2022). Shaping EU agencies’ rulemaking. Comparative European Politics, 20(4), 411–442. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00268-z
Louwerse, T., & Otjes, S. (2018). How Populists Wage Opposition: Parliamentary Opposition Behaviour and Populism in Netherlands: Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718774717
Mair, P. (2001). Searching for the positions of political actors: A review of approaches and a critical evaluation of expert surveys. W M. Laver (Red.), Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors (s. 10–31). Taylor & Francis.
Majone, G. (2004). Dowody, argumenty i perswazja w procesie politycznym. Naukowe PWN.
Margetts, H. (2011). The Internet and Transparency. The Political Quarterly, 82(4), 518–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02253.x
Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00090
Ortega Alvarado, I. A., Sutcliffe, T. E., Berker, T., & Pettersen, I. N. (2021). Emerging circular economies: Discourse coalitions in a Norwegian case. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.011
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2000). Values and discourse in the politics of adjustment. W V. Schmidt Ann & F. Scharpf V., Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness (s. 229–309). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2002). Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002002
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2008). ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(303–326). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(01), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2015). ‘Forgotten Democratic Legitimacy: ‘Governing by the Rules’ and ‘Ruling by the Numbers‘. W M. Matthijs & M. Blyth, The Future of the Euro (s. 90–116). Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2016). Reinterpreting the rules ‘by stealth’ in times of crisis: A discursive institutionalist analysis of the European Central Bank and the European Commission. West European Politics, 39, 1032–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1186389
Schmidt, V., Ann. (2017). Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas. Critical Review, 29(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
Tellmann, S. M. (2016). Experts in public policymaking: Influential, yet constrained. Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
Tretiak, O., Negodchenko, V., Dniprovskii University of the Humanities, Toryanyk, V., Dniprovskii University of the Humanities, Cap, A., & University of Prešov in Prešov. (2019). Economic policy-makers and economic experts in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe: Ways of interaction. Economic Annals-ХХI, 175(1–2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V175-02
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij
Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90.
Wegmann, S. (2020). Policy-making power of opposition players: A comparative institutional perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. https://www-1tandfonline-1com-15m95kya3001c.hanbg.uek.krakow.pl/doi/abs/10.1080/13572334.2020.1843233