Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

The aim of this article is to explore how SHRM (Sustainable Human Resource Management) practices and personal risk management are interpreted by managers across different organisational contexts, and to identify challenges and barriers to implementing these practices. The study focuses on a variety of SHRM approaches in diverse organisational contexts, highlighting the impact of company size, managerial experience, and organisational culture. It also explores the challenges associated with both long-term and short-term SHRM goals and underscores the need for a better understanding and communication of these practices within organisations. The study is based on a qualitative individual in-depth interview (IDI) methodology. The results of the study highlight the importance of adapting and understanding the unique aspects of each organisation to effectively implement SHRM. The article contributes to the literature by highlighting the need for further research into holistic SHRM models, the management personal risk, the use of new technologies, and the development of advanced measurement methods.

Szczegóły artykułu

Jak cytować
Sitarska-Piwko, A., & Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A. (2024). Perceptions of sustainable human resource management (SHRM) and personal risk: Findings from the Pilot Study . Edukacja Ekonomistów I Menedżerów, 69(3). https://doi.org/10.33119/EEIM.2024.69.2

Referencje

  1. Armstrong, A. (2005). Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna.
  2. Bochniarz, P., Gugała, K. (2005). Budowanie i pomiar kapitału ludzkiego w firmie. Warsaw: Poltext.
  3. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa (accessed: 20.01.2024).
  4. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Bryman, A., Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Castells, M. (2010). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  7. Cohen, E., Taylor, S., Muller-Camen, M. (2012). HRM’s Role in Corporate Social and Environmental Sustainability. SHRM Report. Retrieved from: https://www.srhm.org/about/foundation/products/documents/4-12_csr_report_final_for_web.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2024).
  8. Denzin, N. K. (1978). Triangulation: A Case for Methodological Evaluation and Combination. Sociological Methods, p. 339–357.
  9. Dessler, G. (2011). Human Resource Management. New York: Pearson.
  10. Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R. (2017). Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351276443 (accessed: 18.01.2024).
  11. Frankfort-Nachmias, Ch., Nachmias, D. (2001). Metody badawcze w naukach społecznych. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
  12. Glaser, B., Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  13. Gołembski, M. (2015). Parametryzacja funkcji personalnej jako narzędzie zarządzania ryzykiem kadrowym. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 855, p. 523–532.
  14. Grudzewski, W. M., Hejduk, I. K., Sankowska, A., Wańtuchowicz, M. (2010). Sustainability w biznesie, czyli przedsiębiorstwo przyszłości. Zmiany paradygmatów i koncepcji zarządzania. Warsaw: Poltext.
  15. Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research
  16. Interviewing. Sage Publications.
  17. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  18. Mishkin, F. S. (2018). The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets. Pearson.
  19. Misztal, A., Drzewiecka-Dahlke, M., Marczewska-Kuźma, R. (2022). Wyzwania podejścia prewencyjnego w hybrydowym zarządzaniu jakością – kontekst badania wielkopolskich przedsiębiorstw. Organizacja I Kierowanie, 1 (190), p. 143–158.
  20. Nag, D., Pathak, D., Rani, R., Kdv, P. (2023). Current Trends in E-Human Resource Management and its Impact on Personal Effectiveness: An Empirical Study Concerning Informational Technology Employees. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development.
  21. Nawaz N., Durst S., Hariharasudan A., Shamugia Z. (2020). Knowledge Management
  22. Practices in Higher Education Institutions – A Comparative Study. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22 (2), p. 291–308. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.22.2.20 (accessed: 20.01.2024).
  23. Paauwe, Jaap. (2009). HRM and Performance: Achievements, Methodological Issues and Prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 46, p. 129–142.
  24. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  25. Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, A., Wiktorowicz, J. (2023). Innowacyjne praktyki ZZL a proaktywność pracowników i menedżerów zatrudnionych w sektorze BSS. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 151 (2), p. 11–29. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.5925 (accessed: 15.01.2024).
  26. Saldana, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.
  27. Sulistiasih, S., Widodo, W. (2023). How Principals’ Visionary Leadership Practice Reducing Turnover Intention? Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 29 (1), p. 256–268.
  28. Sypniewska, B. A., Baran, M., Kłos, M. (2023). Work Engagement and Employee Satisfaction in the Practice of Sustainable Human Resource Management – Based on the Study of Polish Employees. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19, p. 1–32. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00834-9 (accessed: 20.01.2024).