Ownership vs access in terms of sustainable public procurements
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this article was to examine whether local government units, which constitute the largest group of public procurers in Poland, award sustainable public procurements, in which they emphasize access to goods as a substitute for property. The empirical study was carried out using an electronic questionnaire, which was sent to all n = 2,807 local government units. N = 1041 responses were received, which is 37% of the studied population. Based on the responses received from local government units, an economic analysis of the amended public procurement law was carried out in terms of supporting public contracting authorities in sustainable public procurement. As a result of the economic analysis of public procurement law, it is recommended to promote good practices among public contracting authorities in the scope of each time considering, as part of the analysis of needs and requirements, whether award the tender for access to goods/services.
Downloads
Article Details
The author of the article declares that the submitted article does not infringe the copyrights of third parties. The author agrees to subject the article to the review procedure and to make editorial changes. The author transfers, free of charge, to SGH Publishing House the author's economic rights to the work in the fields of exploitation listed in the Article 50 of the Act of 4 February 1994 on Copyright and Related Rights – provided that the work has been accepted for publication and published.
SGH Publishing House holds economic copyrights to all content of the journal. Placing the text of the article in a repository, on the author's home page or on any other page is allowed as long as it does not involve obtaining economic benefits, and the text will be provided with source information (including the title, year, number and internet address of the journal).
References
2. Andhov M., Caranta R., Stoffel T., Grandia J., Janssen W. A., Vornicu R., Czarnezki J. J., Gromnica A., Tallbo K., Martin-Ortega O., Mélon L., Edman Å., Göthberg P., Nohrstedt P.,Wiesbrock A. (2020), Sustainability Through Public Procurement: The Way Forward – Reform Proposals. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3559393 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.3559393
3. Burchard-Dziubińska M. (2014), Wdrażanie zielonej gospodarki jako odpowiedź Unii Europejskiej na trudności rozwojowe, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica”, 3 (303), s. 135–150.
4. Czernek K., Wójcik D., Marszałek P. (2018), Zaufanie w gospodarce współdzielenia, „Gospodarka Narodowa”, 3 (295), s. 23–48.
5. Džupka P, Kubák M., Nemec P. (2020), Sustainable Public Procurement in Central European Countries. Can It Also Bring Savings?, “Sustainability”, 12 (21):9241.
6. Eikelboom M. E., Gelderman C., Semeijn J. (2018), Sustainable innovation in public procurement: the decisive role of the individual, “Journal of Public Procurement”, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 190–201.
7. Filipiak B., Dylewski M. (2013), Uwarunkowania i proces współdziałania jednostek sektora publicznego i biznesu, „Zeszyty Naukowe WSB w Poznaniu”, 49 (4), s. 27–40.
8. Frenken K., Schor J. (2017), Putting the sharing economy into perspective, “Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions”, 23, s. 3–10.
9. Godlewska M. (2018b), Finansowanie publiczne receptą na innowacje?, w: „Społeczeństwo i gospodarka na innowacyjnej fali” pod red. R. Sobieckiego i J. W. Pietrewicza, Oficyna\ Wydawnicza SGH w Warszawie, Warszawa, s. 109–128.
10. Godlewska M. (2019), Mechanizmy konkurencji w gospodarce współdzielenia (sharing economy), „e-mentor”, 3 (80), s. 51–57.
11. Godlewska M. (2020), Instytucjonalne uwarunkowania przemysłu czasu wolnego w ramach gospodarki dostępu, a zrównoważony rozwój, w: Laboratorium czasu wolnego. Problemy współczesności, pod red. M. Bombol, G. Godlewski, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH w Warszawie, s. 127–140.
12. Godlewska M. (2018a), Zamówienia publiczne, a mechanizmy konkurencji. Przykład konsorcjum ofertowego, „Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie”, nr 1 (46), s. 51–60.
13. Grandia J., Kruyen P. M. (2020), Assessing the implementation of sustainable public procurement using quantitative text-analysis tools: A large-scale analysis of Belgian public procurement notices, “Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management”, Vol. 26, Issue 4, 100627.
14. Hettne J. (2013), Sustainable Public Procurement and the Single Market – Is There a Conflict of Interest?, “European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review”, Vol. 8 (1), pp. 31–40.
15. Hsueh L., Bretschneider S., Stritch J. M., Darnall N. (2020), Implementation of sustainable public procurement in local governments: a measurement approach, “International Journal of Public Sector Management”, Vol. 33 No. 6/7, pp. 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM- 09-2019-0233
16. Mączyńska E. (2007), Gospodarka przełomu: wyzwania dla ekonomistów. Pobrane 17.09.2021 z: http://www.aig.pte.pl/pliki/2/11/Referat_EM_Opole.pdf.
17. Melissen F., Reinders H. (2012), A reflection on the Dutch Sustainable Public Procurement Programme, “Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences”, Vol. 9:1, pp. 27–36.
18. Pietrewicz J. W., Sobiecki R. (2016), Przedsiębiorczość sharing economy w: Sharing Economy (gospodarka współdzielenia), pod red. M. Poniatowska-Jaksch, R. Sobiecki, OW SGH w Warszawie, Warszawa, s. 11–26.
19. Preuss L. (2009), Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the case of local government, “Supply Chain Management”, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 213–223.
20. Prier E., Schwerin E., McCue C. P. (2016), Implementation of sustainable public procurement practices and policies: A sorting framework, “Journal of Public Procurement”, Vol. 16, No. 3, s. 312–346.
21. Scott M., Eddy M. (2014), Uber Service Banned Across Germany by Frankfurt Court, pobrane 10.09.2018 z: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/02/uber-banned-across-germany-byfrankfurt- court.
22. Shadrina E., Romodina I. (2017), Sustainable Public Procurement: International Experience, “Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics”, Vol. 1, p. 149–172.
23. Skrzek-Lubasińska M. (2016), Sharing economy – szanse i zagrożenia dla polskiego rynku pracy, w: Sharing Economy (gospodarka współdzielenia), pod red. M. Poniatowska-Jaksch, R. Sobiecki, OW SGH w Warszawie, Warszawa, s. 89–108.
24. Slee T. (2015), What’s yours is mine. Against the Sharing Economy, New York, London: OR Books.
25. Sobiecki G. (2016), Sharing economy – dylematy pojęciowe, w: Sharing Economy (gospodarka współdzielenia), pod red. M. Poniatowska-Jaksch, R. Sobiecki, OW SGH w Warszawie, Warszawa, s. 27–38.
26. Sporrong J., Bröchner J. (2009), Public Procurement Incentives for Sustainable Design Services: Swedish Experiences, “Architectural Engineering and Design Management”, Vol. 5 (1-2), s. 24–35.
27. Stępnicka N., Wiączek P. (2018), Sharing economy vs. Access economy – wybrane aspekty terminologiczne i metodologiczne, „Prace naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu”, nr 530, s. 13–25.
28. Szołucha M., Palutkiewicz P., Kochman O. (2017), Ekonomia dostępu a wyzwania stojące przed polską gospodarką. Pobrane 15.09.2021 r. z: http://instigos.org.
29. Ustawa z dnia 11 września 2019 r. Prawo zamówień publicznych (Dz. U. z 2021 r. poz. 1129, 1598).
30. Zawiślińska E. (2011), Państwo i gospodarka, w: Współczesne państwo w teorii i praktyce, pod red. J. Oniszczuk, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa, s. 605–24.