Pasek boczny artykułu
Treść głównego artykułu
Abstrakt
Konstruktywizm to najbardziej dynamicznie rozwijająca się koncepcja w socjologii problemów społecznych . Projekty badawcze oparte na tym paradygmacie, zwłaszcza te poświęcone korupcji, dostarczają cennych informacji i umożliwiają formułowanie wniosków na temat natury tego zjawiska, co byłoby trudne do osiągnięcia na podstawie innych teoretycznych tradycji . Głównym celem tego artykułu jest pokazanie, w jaki sposób konstruktywistyczne podejście może być zastosowane, aby lepiej zrozumieć naturę współczesnej korupcji i dlaczego jedno z najbardziej popularnych rozwiązań w dzisiejszych czasach, agencje antykorupcyjne (ACAS), tak często zawodzą. Według autora jeden z najważniejszych powodów, dlaczego ACAS nie są skuteczne, jest silnie związany z tym jak problem społeczny korupcji jest skonstruowany
Słowa kluczowe
Szczegóły artykułu
Czasopismo „Studia z Polityki Publicznej/Public Policy Studies” zapewnia dostęp do treści artykułów w trybie otwartego dostępu (Open Access) na zasadach licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe (CC BY 4.0).
Więcej informacji: Polityka Open Access czasopisma "Studia z Polityki Publicznej/Public Policy Studies"
Referencje
- Anechiarico F., Jacobs J. B., The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity. How Corruption Makes Government Ineffective, The University Press of Chicago, Chicago 1996.
- Benson R., Saguy A., Constructing Social Problems in an Age of Globalization: A French-American Comparison, “American Sociological Review” 2005, No. 70.
- Best J., Constructionism in Context, in: J. Best (Ed.), Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems, New York 1995.
- Bryane M., The Globalization of Anticorruption Policies: The Diffusion of Best Practicies and the Role of Knowledge Management, in: D. Levi-Faur. E. Vigoda-Gadot (Ed.), International Public Policy and Management. Policy Learning Beyond Regional, Cultural, and Political Boudaries, Marcel Dekker, New York 2004.
- Bukovansky M., Corruption Is Bad: Normative Dimensions of the Anti-corruption Movement, Australian National University, Working Paper 2002, http://ips.cap.anu.edu.au/ir/pubs/work_papers/02–5.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- Charron N., Mapping and Measuring the Impact of Anti-Corruption Agencies: A New Dataset. Presentation prepared for the conference: New Public Management and the Quality of Government, Göteborg 2008, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/mapping-andmeasuring-the-impact-of-anti-corruption-agencies--a-new-dataset-for-18-countries.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- Christie N., Dogodni wrogowie, in: M. Płatek, M. Fajst (Eds.), W kręgu kryminologii romantycznej, Liber, Warsaw 2004.
- de Gruyter A., Slezak P., A Critique of Radical Constructivism, in: D. S. Philips (Ed.), Constructivism in Education, NSFSE, Chicago 2000.
- de Sousa L., Anti-corruption Agencies: Between Empowerment and Irrelevance. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working Papers 2009, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/anti-corruption%20agencies%20between%20empowerment%20and%20irrelevance.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- de Sousa L., European Anti-Corruption Agencies: protecting the Community’s Financial Interests, ANCORAGE-NET Working Papers 2006, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/williams,%20robert%20 (durham%20university,%20uk). pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- Dionisie D., Checchi F., Corruption and Anti-Corruption Agencies in Eastern Europe. ANCORAGE-NET Working Papers 2008, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/dionisiechecchi-corruption_in_ee.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- Doig A., Watt D., Williams R., Measuring ‘Success’ in Five African Anti-Corruption Commissions Measuring ‘Success’, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen 2005.
- Dolowitz D., Marsh D., Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making, “Governance” 2000, Vol. 13, No. 1.
- Ernie K., Yu-Chang S., Chilik Y., Sibling Rivalry among Anti-corruption Agencies in Taiwan: Is Redundancy Doomed to Fail?, “Asian Education and Development Studies” 2015, Vol. 4, No. 1.
- Fine G. A., Scandal, Social Conditions, and the Creation of Public Attention: Fatty Arbuckle and the “Problem of Hollywood”, “Social Problems” 1997, Vol. 44, No. 3.
- Gamson W. A., Constructing Social Protest, in: H. Johnston Hank, B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social Movements, Protest, and Contention, University of Minnesota Press, 1995.
- Gamson W. A., Corteau D., Hoynes W., Sasson T., Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality, “Annual Review of Sociology” 1992, No. 18.
- Girard R., Kozioł ofiarny, Wydawnictwo Łódzkie, Łódź 1991.
- Gusfield J. R., Constructing the Ownership of Social Problems: Fun and Profit in the Welfare State, “Social Problems” 1989, Vol. 36, No. 5.
- Heilbrunn J. R., Anti-Corruption Commissions Panacea, The World Bank Working Paper 2006, http://wbi.worldbank.org/wbi/Data/wbi/wbicms/files/drupal-acquia/wbi/AntiCorruption%20Commissions%20by%20John%20Heilbrunn.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- Hussmann K., Hechler H., Peñailill H., Institutional Arrangements for Corruption Prevention: Considerations for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption Article 6, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Bergen 2009.
- Jamrozik A., Nocella L., The Sociology of Social Problems. Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of Intervention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
- Johnston M., Independent Anti-Corruption Commissions: Success Stories and Cautionary Tales, in: C. Fijnaut, L. Huberts (Eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Kluwer Law International, New York 2002.
- Kaufmann D., Revisiting Anti-Corruption Strategies: Tilt Towards Incentive-Driven Approaches, in: Corruption&Integrity Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries, UNDP, New York 1998.
- Krastev I., Stoyanov A., Prime Minister’s Dilemma: Do Non-Corrupt Governments, “Working Paper Collegium Budapest”, Budapest 2003, www.colbud.hu/honesty-trust/krastev/pub03.doc. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- Krastev I., When “Should” Does Not Imply “Can” The Making of the Washington Consensus on Corruption, in: W. Lepenies (Ed.), Entangled Histories and Negotiated Universals: Centers and Peripheries in a Changing World, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt 2000.
- Krastev I., The Strange (Re)Discovery of Corruption, in: R. Dahrendorf (Ed.), The Paradoxes of Unintended Consequences, CEU Press, Budapest 2000.
- Krastev I., When “Should” Does Not Imply “Can” The Making of the Washington Consensus on Corruption, Fribourg Institute of Federalism, Fribourg 2003.
- Kurczewski J., Czy możliwa jest socjologia korupcji?, in: J. Kurczewski, B. Łaciak (Eds.), Korupcja w życiu społecznym, ISP, Warsaw 2000.
- Makowski G., Korupcja jako problem społeczny, Trio, Warsaw 2008.
- Makowski G., Socjologiczna analiza funkcjonowania centralnych organów antykorupcyjnych. Międzynarodowa perspektywa i polskie doświadczenia, ISP, Warsaw 2010.
- Meagher P., Anti-Corruption Agencies: A Review of Experience, University of Maryland: Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector, 2004.
- Meagher P., Anti-corruption Agencies: Rhetoric Versus Reality, “Journal of Policy Reform” 2005, Vol. 8, No. 1.
- Meagher P., Anti-Corruption Agencies, OECD: Specialized Anti-Corruption Institutions. Review of Models, OECD, Paris 2007.
- A. Mungiu-Pippidi (Ed.), Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lesson Learned, 2011,
- http://www.oecd.org/countries/zambia/48912957.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2015.
- Pavarala V., Interpreting Corruption. Elite Perspectives in India, Sage Publications, New Delhi 1996.
- Polzer T., Corruption: Deconstructing the World Bank Discourse, LSE Working Papers 2001,
- http://www2.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/pdf/WP18.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- Quah J. S. T., Combating Corruption in Singapore: What Can Be Learned?, “Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management” 2001, Vol., No. 1.
- Quah J. S. T., Defying Institutional Failure: Learning from the Experiences of Anti-Corruption
- Agencies in Four Asian Countries, Presentation for the conference: Empowering AntiCorruption Agencies: Defying Institutional Failure and Strengthening Preventive and Repressive Capacities, Lisboa, 14–16 May 2008, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/quah.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
- Quah J. S. T., Curbing Asian Corruption: An Impossible Dream?, “Current History” 2006, Vol. 105, No. 690.
- Quah J. S. T., Evaluating the Effectiveness of Anti-corruption Agencies in five Asian Countries: A Comparative Analysis, “Asian Education and Development Studies” 2015, Vol. 4, No. 1.
- Robert G., Political Independence, Operational Impartiality, and the Effectiveness of Anti-corruption Agencies, “Asian Education and Development Studies” 2015, Vol. 4, No. 1.
- Rubington E., Weinberg, M. S., The Study of Social Problems. Seven Perspectives (Sixth Edition), Oxford University Press New York 2003.
- Schneider J. W., Social Problems Theory: The Constructionist View, “Annual Reviews” 1985, Vol. 11.
- Sík A., The Bad, the Worse and the Worst: Guesstimating the Level of Corruption, in: A. Sajó, S. Kotkin (Eds.), Political Corruption in Transition: A Skeptic’s Handbook, CEU Press New York 2002.
- UNDP, Mainstreaming Anti-Corruption in Development, New York 2008.
- Wing Lo T., Corruption and Politics in Hong Kong and China, Open University Press, Buckingham 1993.
- Woolgar S., Pawluch D., How Shall We Move Beyond Constructivism, “Social Problems” 1985, Vol. 33, No. 2.
Referencje
Anechiarico F., Jacobs J. B., The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity. How Corruption Makes Government Ineffective, The University Press of Chicago, Chicago 1996.
Benson R., Saguy A., Constructing Social Problems in an Age of Globalization: A French-American Comparison, “American Sociological Review” 2005, No. 70.
Best J., Constructionism in Context, in: J. Best (Ed.), Images of Issues: Typifying Contemporary Social Problems, New York 1995.
Bryane M., The Globalization of Anticorruption Policies: The Diffusion of Best Practicies and the Role of Knowledge Management, in: D. Levi-Faur. E. Vigoda-Gadot (Ed.), International Public Policy and Management. Policy Learning Beyond Regional, Cultural, and Political Boudaries, Marcel Dekker, New York 2004.
Bukovansky M., Corruption Is Bad: Normative Dimensions of the Anti-corruption Movement, Australian National University, Working Paper 2002, http://ips.cap.anu.edu.au/ir/pubs/work_papers/02–5.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
Charron N., Mapping and Measuring the Impact of Anti-Corruption Agencies: A New Dataset. Presentation prepared for the conference: New Public Management and the Quality of Government, Göteborg 2008, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/mapping-andmeasuring-the-impact-of-anti-corruption-agencies--a-new-dataset-for-18-countries.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
Christie N., Dogodni wrogowie, in: M. Płatek, M. Fajst (Eds.), W kręgu kryminologii romantycznej, Liber, Warsaw 2004.
de Gruyter A., Slezak P., A Critique of Radical Constructivism, in: D. S. Philips (Ed.), Constructivism in Education, NSFSE, Chicago 2000.
de Sousa L., Anti-corruption Agencies: Between Empowerment and Irrelevance. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working Papers 2009, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/anti-corruption%20agencies%20between%20empowerment%20and%20irrelevance.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
de Sousa L., European Anti-Corruption Agencies: protecting the Community’s Financial Interests, ANCORAGE-NET Working Papers 2006, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/williams,%20robert%20 (durham%20university,%20uk). pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
Dionisie D., Checchi F., Corruption and Anti-Corruption Agencies in Eastern Europe. ANCORAGE-NET Working Papers 2008, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/dionisiechecchi-corruption_in_ee.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
Doig A., Watt D., Williams R., Measuring ‘Success’ in Five African Anti-Corruption Commissions Measuring ‘Success’, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen 2005.
Dolowitz D., Marsh D., Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making, “Governance” 2000, Vol. 13, No. 1.
Ernie K., Yu-Chang S., Chilik Y., Sibling Rivalry among Anti-corruption Agencies in Taiwan: Is Redundancy Doomed to Fail?, “Asian Education and Development Studies” 2015, Vol. 4, No. 1.
Fine G. A., Scandal, Social Conditions, and the Creation of Public Attention: Fatty Arbuckle and the “Problem of Hollywood”, “Social Problems” 1997, Vol. 44, No. 3.
Gamson W. A., Constructing Social Protest, in: H. Johnston Hank, B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social Movements, Protest, and Contention, University of Minnesota Press, 1995.
Gamson W. A., Corteau D., Hoynes W., Sasson T., Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality, “Annual Review of Sociology” 1992, No. 18.
Girard R., Kozioł ofiarny, Wydawnictwo Łódzkie, Łódź 1991.
Gusfield J. R., Constructing the Ownership of Social Problems: Fun and Profit in the Welfare State, “Social Problems” 1989, Vol. 36, No. 5.
Heilbrunn J. R., Anti-Corruption Commissions Panacea, The World Bank Working Paper 2006, http://wbi.worldbank.org/wbi/Data/wbi/wbicms/files/drupal-acquia/wbi/AntiCorruption%20Commissions%20by%20John%20Heilbrunn.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
Hussmann K., Hechler H., Peñailill H., Institutional Arrangements for Corruption Prevention: Considerations for the Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption Article 6, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Bergen 2009.
Jamrozik A., Nocella L., The Sociology of Social Problems. Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of Intervention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998.
Johnston M., Independent Anti-Corruption Commissions: Success Stories and Cautionary Tales, in: C. Fijnaut, L. Huberts (Eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Kluwer Law International, New York 2002.
Kaufmann D., Revisiting Anti-Corruption Strategies: Tilt Towards Incentive-Driven Approaches, in: Corruption&Integrity Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries, UNDP, New York 1998.
Krastev I., Stoyanov A., Prime Minister’s Dilemma: Do Non-Corrupt Governments, “Working Paper Collegium Budapest”, Budapest 2003, www.colbud.hu/honesty-trust/krastev/pub03.doc. Accessed 11 August 2012.
Krastev I., When “Should” Does Not Imply “Can” The Making of the Washington Consensus on Corruption, in: W. Lepenies (Ed.), Entangled Histories and Negotiated Universals: Centers and Peripheries in a Changing World, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt 2000.
Krastev I., The Strange (Re)Discovery of Corruption, in: R. Dahrendorf (Ed.), The Paradoxes of Unintended Consequences, CEU Press, Budapest 2000.
Krastev I., When “Should” Does Not Imply “Can” The Making of the Washington Consensus on Corruption, Fribourg Institute of Federalism, Fribourg 2003.
Kurczewski J., Czy możliwa jest socjologia korupcji?, in: J. Kurczewski, B. Łaciak (Eds.), Korupcja w życiu społecznym, ISP, Warsaw 2000.
Makowski G., Korupcja jako problem społeczny, Trio, Warsaw 2008.
Makowski G., Socjologiczna analiza funkcjonowania centralnych organów antykorupcyjnych. Międzynarodowa perspektywa i polskie doświadczenia, ISP, Warsaw 2010.
Meagher P., Anti-Corruption Agencies: A Review of Experience, University of Maryland: Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector, 2004.
Meagher P., Anti-corruption Agencies: Rhetoric Versus Reality, “Journal of Policy Reform” 2005, Vol. 8, No. 1.
Meagher P., Anti-Corruption Agencies, OECD: Specialized Anti-Corruption Institutions. Review of Models, OECD, Paris 2007.
A. Mungiu-Pippidi (Ed.), Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lesson Learned, 2011,
http://www.oecd.org/countries/zambia/48912957.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2015.
Pavarala V., Interpreting Corruption. Elite Perspectives in India, Sage Publications, New Delhi 1996.
Polzer T., Corruption: Deconstructing the World Bank Discourse, LSE Working Papers 2001,
http://www2.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/pdf/WP18.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
Quah J. S. T., Combating Corruption in Singapore: What Can Be Learned?, “Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management” 2001, Vol., No. 1.
Quah J. S. T., Defying Institutional Failure: Learning from the Experiences of Anti-Corruption
Agencies in Four Asian Countries, Presentation for the conference: Empowering AntiCorruption Agencies: Defying Institutional Failure and Strengthening Preventive and Repressive Capacities, Lisboa, 14–16 May 2008, http://ancorage-net.org/content/documents/quah.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2012.
Quah J. S. T., Curbing Asian Corruption: An Impossible Dream?, “Current History” 2006, Vol. 105, No. 690.
Quah J. S. T., Evaluating the Effectiveness of Anti-corruption Agencies in five Asian Countries: A Comparative Analysis, “Asian Education and Development Studies” 2015, Vol. 4, No. 1.
Robert G., Political Independence, Operational Impartiality, and the Effectiveness of Anti-corruption Agencies, “Asian Education and Development Studies” 2015, Vol. 4, No. 1.
Rubington E., Weinberg, M. S., The Study of Social Problems. Seven Perspectives (Sixth Edition), Oxford University Press New York 2003.
Schneider J. W., Social Problems Theory: The Constructionist View, “Annual Reviews” 1985, Vol. 11.
Sík A., The Bad, the Worse and the Worst: Guesstimating the Level of Corruption, in: A. Sajó, S. Kotkin (Eds.), Political Corruption in Transition: A Skeptic’s Handbook, CEU Press New York 2002.
UNDP, Mainstreaming Anti-Corruption in Development, New York 2008.
Wing Lo T., Corruption and Politics in Hong Kong and China, Open University Press, Buckingham 1993.
Woolgar S., Pawluch D., How Shall We Move Beyond Constructivism, “Social Problems” 1985, Vol. 33, No. 2.