Main Article Content

Abstract

The author of the article presents and analyzes the concept of the public sphere which was created by Plessner in the twenties of the twentieth century. It includes the main work of Plessner written in 1923, The Limits of Community: A Critique of Social Radicalism. This book presents two forms of public life organisation: community and society. Plessner shows the important differences in the understanding of the role of the individual in these two forms of human collectivity organisation. Plessner creates its own versions of anthropology for understanding the possibility of different treatment of individuals in the community and in society. He presented this concept in the paper entitled Conditio humana in 1961 which represents one of the main works of political anthropology in the twentieth century. His research effort focuses on the presentation of the role of the public sphere in the social life. Its important characteristic is neutral behavior of people performing the roles in social life. According to Plessner, there are two types of community: a blood-based type and an ideal-based type both of which aspire to control the public sphere. The meaning of Plessner's concept is very broad; both for explaining the totalitarianism creation in Germany as well as for discovering a deeper sense of political changes in the modern world.

Keywords

antropologia polityczna wspólnota społeczeństwo sfera publiczna political anthropology community society public sphere

Article Details

How to Cite
Szulczewski, G. . (2017) “Public sphere within the framework of Helmut Plessner’s political anthropology”, Public Policy Studies, 4(1(13), pp. 9–24. doi: 10.33119/KSzPP.2017.1.1.

Metrics

References

  1. Gadowska K., Winczorek J., Sfera publiczna – funkcje, dysfunkcje, normy oficjalne i nieoficjalne, „Studia Socjologiczne” 2013, nr 1(208).
  2. Heidegger M., Bycie i czas, PWN, Warszawa 1994.
  3. Jabłońska E., Polityka publiczna we współczesnym państwie. Sprawozdanie z konferencji Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie, „Studia i Prace KES” 2015, nr 1(21).
  4. Osiński J., Sfera publiczna i sfera prywatna – w poszukiwaniu modus vivendi, w: Polityka publiczna we współczesnym państwie, red. J. Osiński, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2014.
  5. Plessner H., Granice wspólnot. Krytyka radykalizmu społecznego, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2008.
  6. Plessner H., Pytanie o conditio humana, tłum. Z. Krasnodębski, PIW, Warszawa 1988.
  7. Plessner H., Soziale Rolle und menschliche Natur, w: Schriften zur Soziologie und Sozialphilosophie Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1985.
  8. Schopenhauer A., Parerga und Paralipomena: kleine philosophische Schriften, „Sämtliche Werke“ t. 5, Cotta, Stuttgart 1965.