Blockchain Application Options and Their Selection Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2019.173.6Keywords:
blockchain, private, public, licensed, unlicensedAbstract
Over only 10 years, blockchain has developed into a highly complex and diverse solution with a number of application options representing diverse structures and properties. Despite such a wide interest in the new concept, there is still no regulation, classification or structure that would help to more easily interpret this rather complex technology as well as to analyse and compare possibilities that it offers. This leads to an extended decision-making process additionally burdened with a substantial risk of making mistakes or selecting a solution that is not the optimum one. This paper aims at a structured presentation of blockchain properties and their intensity in subsequent application options, which could provide foundations for building selection models assisting in finding an optimum combination for a given entity based on its individual or business preferences, business model or strategy.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Agrawal A., Gans J., Goldfarb A. [2016], The Simple Economics of Machine Intelligence, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2016/11/the-simple-economics-of-machine-intelligence
[dostęp 2.07.2018].
2. Albrecht S., Reichert S., Schmid J., Strüker J., Neumann D., Fridgen G. [2018], Dynamics of Blockchain Implementation – A Case Study from the Energy Sector,51st Hawaii International
Conference on System Science, scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/50334 [dostęp 22.07.2018].
3. Alstyne M. W. V., Parker G. G., Choudary S. P. [2016], Pipelines, Platforms, and the New Rules of Strategy, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2016/04/pipelines-platforms-and-the-new-
-rules-of-strategy [dostęp 1.07.2018].
4. Athey S., Catalini C., Tucker C. [2017], The Digital Privacy Paradox: Small Money, Small Costs, Small Talk, National Bureau of Economic Research, people.stanford.edu/athey/sites/default/
files/digital_privacy_paradox_02_13_17.pdf [dostęp 2.07.2018].
5. Atzori M. [2015], Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?, [SSRN Scholarly Paper] Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, papers.ssrn.
com/abstract=2709713 [dostęp 2.07.2018].
6. Back A. [2002], Hashcash – A Denial of Service Counter-Measure, s. 10.
7. Bank for International Settlements [2017], Distributed Ledger Technology in Payment, Clearing and Settlement, s. 29.
8. Basden J., Cottrell M. [2017], How Utilities Are Using Blockchain to Modernize the Grid, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/how-utilities-are-using-blockchain-to-modernize-
the-grid [dostęp 1.07.2018].
9. Berg C., Davidson S., Potts J. [2018], Some Public Economics of Blockchain Technology, [SSRN Scholarly Paper] Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, papers.ssrn.com/abstract=
3132857 [dostęp 2.07.2018].
10. Böhme R., Christin N., Edelman B., Moore T. [2015], Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance, „Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 29 (2), s. 213–238.
11. Bresnahan T. F., Trajtenberg M. [1995], General Purpose Technologies ‘Engines of Growth’?, „Journal of Econometrics”, 65 (1), s. 83–108.
12. Brown R. G. [2014], The “Unbundling of Trust”: How to Identify Good Cryptocurrency Opportunities? Richard Gendal Brown, gendal.me/2014/11/14/the-unbundling-of-trust-how-to-identify-good-cryptocurrency-opportunities/ [dostęp 28.07.2018].
13. Buterin V. [2015], On Public and Private Blockchains, blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/07/on-public-and-private-blockchains/ [dostęp 28.07.2018].
14. Casey, M. J., Wong P. [2017], Global Supply Chains Are About to Get Better, Thanks to Blockchain, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/global-supply-chains-are-about-to-get-
-better-thanks-to-blockchain [dostęp 1.07.2018].
15. Catalini C. [2017], How Blockchain Applications Will Move Beyond Finance, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/how-blockchain-applications-will-move-beyond-finance
[dostęp 1.07.2018].
16. Catalini C., Gans J. S. [2018], Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain, National bureau of economic research, (22952).
17. Chitchyan R., Murkin J. [2018], Review of Blockchain Technology and its Expectations: Case of the Energy Sector. arXiv:1803.03567 [cs], arxiv.org/abs/1803.03567 [dostęp 22.07.2018].
18. Coase R. H. [1937], The Nature of the Firm, „Economica”, 4 (16), s. 386–405.
19. Cochrane K. [2018], To Regain Consumers’ Trust, Marketers Need Transparent Data Practices, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2018/06/to-regain-consumers-trust-marketers-need-
transparent-data-practices [dostęp 2.07.2018].
20. Davidson S., De Filippi P., Potts J. [2018], Economics of Blockchain, Social Science Research Network.
21. De Kruiff J., Weigand H. [2017], Towards a Blockchain Ontology, The Netherlands, pdfs. semanticscholar.org/0782/c5badb4f407ee0964d07eda9f74a92de3298.pdf [dostęp 22.07.2018].
22. Evans D. S. [2014], Economic Aspects of Bitcoin and Other Decentralized Public-Ledger Currency Platforms, „SSRN Electronic Journal”, www.ssrn.com/abstract=2424516 [dostęp 2.07.2018].
23. Feig E. [2018], A Framework for Blockchain-Based Applications. arXiv:1803.00892 [cs], arxiv.org/abs/1803.00892 [dostęp 22.07.2018].
24. Forde B. [2017], Using Blockchain to Keep Public Data Public, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/using-blockchain-to-keep-public-data-public [dostęp 1.07.2018].
25. Frydman R., Duncan I., Goldberg M. D. [2007], Imperfect Knowledge Economics: Exchange Rates and Risk, Princeton University Press.
26. Garzik J. [2015], Public Versus Private Blockchains, USA, bitfury.com/content/downloads/public-vs-private-pt1–1.pdf [dostęp 22.07.2018].
27. Hileman G., Rauchs M. [2017], 2017 Global Blockchain Benchmarking Study, [SSRN Scholarly Paper] Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3040224
[dostęp 2.07.2018].
28. Hurwicz L. [1973], The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation, „The American Economic Review”, 63 (2), s. 1–30.
29. Hurwicz L. [1994], Economic Design, Adjustment Processes, Mechanisms, and Institutions. „Economic Design”, 1 (1), s. 1–14.
30. Iansiti M., Lakhani K. R. [2017], The Truth About Blockchain, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain [dostęp 29.03.2018].
31. IBM [2017], CNW | IBM Announces Major Blockchain Collaboration with Dole, Driscoll’s, Golden State Foods, Kroger, McCormick and Company, McLane Company, Nestlé, Tyson Foods,
Unilever and Walmart to Address Food Safety Worldwide, www.newswire.ca/news-releases/ibm-announces-major-blockchain-collaboration-with-dole-driscolls-golden-state-foods-kroger-
mccormick-and-company-mclane-company-nestle-tyson-foods-unilever-and-walmart-to-address-food-safety-worldwide-641378083.html [dostęp 2.07.2018].
32. Ito J., Narula N., Ali R. [2017], The Blockchain Will Do to the Financial System What the Internet Did to Media, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/the-blockchain-will-do-to-
-banks-and-law-firms-what-the-internet-did-to-media [dostęp 7.01.2018].
33. Kenney M., Zysman J. [2015], Choosing a Future in the Platform Economy: The Implications and Consequences of Digital Platforms, Kauffman Foundation New Entrepreneurial Growth
Conference, www.brie.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/PlatformEconomy2DistributeJune21.pdf [dostęp 1.07.2018].
34. Kim H. M., Laskowski M. [2018], Toward an Ontology‐driven Blockchain Design for Supplychain Provenance – Business – ProQuest, „Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and
Management”, 25 (1), s. 18–27.
35. Konopczak M., Sieradzki R., Wiernicki M. [2010], Kryzys na światowych rynkach finansowych – wpływ na rynek finansowy w Polsce oraz implikacje dla sektora realnego, „Bank i Kredyt”,
41 (6).
36. Kshetri N. [2018], 1 Blockchain’s Roles in Meeting Key Supply Chain Management Objectives – Business – ProQuest, „International Journal of Information Management”, 39, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401217305248 [dostęp 2.07.2018].
37. Laffont J.‑J., Martimort D. [2009], The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model, Princeton University Press.
38. Leon D. C. de, Stalick A. Q., Jillepalli A. A., Haney M. A., Sheldon F. T. [2017], Blockchain: Properties and Misconceptions, „Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship”,
11 (3), s. 286–300.
39. Mainelli M. [2017], Blockchain Could Help Us Reclaim Control of Our Personal Data, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/10/smart-ledgers-can-help-us-reclaim-control-of-our-personal-data [dostęp 1.07.2018].
40. McWaters J., Galaski R. [2017], Beyond Fintech: A Pragmatic Assessment Of Disruptive Potential In Financial Services.
41. Nakamoto S. [2008], Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
42. Nowiński W., Kozma M. [2017], How Can Blockchain Technology Disrupt the Existing Business Models?, „Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review”, 5 (3), s. 173–188.
43. Nurisso G., Prescott E. S. [2017], The 1970 s Origins of Too Big to Fail, www.clevelandfed.org:/newsroom-and-events/publications/economic-commentary/2017-economic-commentaries/
ec-201717-origins-of-too-big-to-fail [dostęp 6.07.2018].
44. Oh J., Shong I. [2017], A Case Study on Business Model Innovations Using Blockchain: Focusing on Financial Institutions, „Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship”,
11 (3), s. 335–344.
45. Petersen M., Hackius N., See B. V. [2017], Mapping the Sea of Opportunities: Blockchain in Supply Chain and Logistics.
46. Pilkington M. [2016], Blockchain Technology: Principles and Applications, University of Burgundy.
47. PR Newswire [2017], Transparency-One and Microsoft Announce Blockchain Service for Supply Chain Transparency: Blockchain Initiative Will Enhance Security of Global Supply Chain
Data – Business – ProQuest, www.transparency-one.com/microsoft-blockchain-supply-chain-transparency [dostęp 2.07.2018].
48. Salviotti G., De Rossi L. M., Abbatemarco N. [2018], A Structured Framework to Assess the Business Application Landscape of Blockchain Technologies, hdl.handle.net/10125/50328
[dostęp 22.07.2018].
49. Schrage M. [2016], Instead of Optimizing Processes, Reimagine Them as Platforms, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2016/12/instead-of-optimizing-processes-reimagine-them-as-platforms [dostęp 1.07.2018].
50. Scott B. [2016], How Can Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology Play a Role in Building Social and Solidarity Finance?, The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development
(UNRISD), s. 25.
51. Tabarrok A., Cowen T. [2015], The End of Asymmetric Information, www.cato-unbound.org/2015/04/06/alex-tabarrok-tyler-cowen/end-asymmetric-information [dostęp 2.07.2018].
52. Tapscott D., Tapscott A. [2016], The Impact of the Blockchain Goes Beyond Financial Services, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2016/05/the-impact-of-the-blockchain-goes-beyond-financial-services [dostęp 29.03.2018].
53. Tasca P., Tessone C. [2018], Taxonomy of Blockchain Technologies. Principles of Identification and Classification, University of Zurich.
54. Täuscher K., Laudien S. M. [2018], Understanding Platform Business Models: A Mixed Methods Study of Marketplaces, „European Management Journal”, 36 (3), s. 319–329.
55. The Economist [2018], Blockchain Technology May Offer a Way to Re-decentralise the Internet, „The Economist”, www.economist.com/special-report/2018/06/30/blockchain-technology-
may-offer-a-way-to-re-decentralise-the-internet [dostęp 9.07.2018].
56. Tucker C., Catalini C. [2018], What Blockchain Can’t Do, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2018/06/what-blockchain-cant-do [dostęp 1.07.2018].
57. Tullock G. [1988], Efficient Rent-Seeking Revisited, w: The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking, Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy, Springer, Boston, MA, s. 91–94, link.springer.
com/chapter/10.1007/978–1–4757–1963-5_7 [dostęp 28.07.2018].
58. World Economic Forum [2015], Deep Shift Technology Tipping Points and Societal Impact, www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf
[dostęp 2.07.2018].
59. Wüst K., Gervais A. [2017], Do You Need a Blockchain?, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, s. 7.
60. Xu X., Weber I., Staples M., Zhu L., Bosch J., Bass L., Pautasso C., Rimba P. [2017], A Taxonomy of Blockchain-Based Systems for Architecture Design, w: 2017 IEEE International Conference
on Software Architecture (ICSA), 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA). s. 243–252.
[dostęp 2.07.2018].
2. Albrecht S., Reichert S., Schmid J., Strüker J., Neumann D., Fridgen G. [2018], Dynamics of Blockchain Implementation – A Case Study from the Energy Sector,51st Hawaii International
Conference on System Science, scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/50334 [dostęp 22.07.2018].
3. Alstyne M. W. V., Parker G. G., Choudary S. P. [2016], Pipelines, Platforms, and the New Rules of Strategy, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2016/04/pipelines-platforms-and-the-new-
-rules-of-strategy [dostęp 1.07.2018].
4. Athey S., Catalini C., Tucker C. [2017], The Digital Privacy Paradox: Small Money, Small Costs, Small Talk, National Bureau of Economic Research, people.stanford.edu/athey/sites/default/
files/digital_privacy_paradox_02_13_17.pdf [dostęp 2.07.2018].
5. Atzori M. [2015], Blockchain Technology and Decentralized Governance: Is the State Still Necessary?, [SSRN Scholarly Paper] Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, papers.ssrn.
com/abstract=2709713 [dostęp 2.07.2018].
6. Back A. [2002], Hashcash – A Denial of Service Counter-Measure, s. 10.
7. Bank for International Settlements [2017], Distributed Ledger Technology in Payment, Clearing and Settlement, s. 29.
8. Basden J., Cottrell M. [2017], How Utilities Are Using Blockchain to Modernize the Grid, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/how-utilities-are-using-blockchain-to-modernize-
the-grid [dostęp 1.07.2018].
9. Berg C., Davidson S., Potts J. [2018], Some Public Economics of Blockchain Technology, [SSRN Scholarly Paper] Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, papers.ssrn.com/abstract=
3132857 [dostęp 2.07.2018].
10. Böhme R., Christin N., Edelman B., Moore T. [2015], Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance, „Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 29 (2), s. 213–238.
11. Bresnahan T. F., Trajtenberg M. [1995], General Purpose Technologies ‘Engines of Growth’?, „Journal of Econometrics”, 65 (1), s. 83–108.
12. Brown R. G. [2014], The “Unbundling of Trust”: How to Identify Good Cryptocurrency Opportunities? Richard Gendal Brown, gendal.me/2014/11/14/the-unbundling-of-trust-how-to-identify-good-cryptocurrency-opportunities/ [dostęp 28.07.2018].
13. Buterin V. [2015], On Public and Private Blockchains, blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/07/on-public-and-private-blockchains/ [dostęp 28.07.2018].
14. Casey, M. J., Wong P. [2017], Global Supply Chains Are About to Get Better, Thanks to Blockchain, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/global-supply-chains-are-about-to-get-
-better-thanks-to-blockchain [dostęp 1.07.2018].
15. Catalini C. [2017], How Blockchain Applications Will Move Beyond Finance, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/how-blockchain-applications-will-move-beyond-finance
[dostęp 1.07.2018].
16. Catalini C., Gans J. S. [2018], Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain, National bureau of economic research, (22952).
17. Chitchyan R., Murkin J. [2018], Review of Blockchain Technology and its Expectations: Case of the Energy Sector. arXiv:1803.03567 [cs], arxiv.org/abs/1803.03567 [dostęp 22.07.2018].
18. Coase R. H. [1937], The Nature of the Firm, „Economica”, 4 (16), s. 386–405.
19. Cochrane K. [2018], To Regain Consumers’ Trust, Marketers Need Transparent Data Practices, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2018/06/to-regain-consumers-trust-marketers-need-
transparent-data-practices [dostęp 2.07.2018].
20. Davidson S., De Filippi P., Potts J. [2018], Economics of Blockchain, Social Science Research Network.
21. De Kruiff J., Weigand H. [2017], Towards a Blockchain Ontology, The Netherlands, pdfs. semanticscholar.org/0782/c5badb4f407ee0964d07eda9f74a92de3298.pdf [dostęp 22.07.2018].
22. Evans D. S. [2014], Economic Aspects of Bitcoin and Other Decentralized Public-Ledger Currency Platforms, „SSRN Electronic Journal”, www.ssrn.com/abstract=2424516 [dostęp 2.07.2018].
23. Feig E. [2018], A Framework for Blockchain-Based Applications. arXiv:1803.00892 [cs], arxiv.org/abs/1803.00892 [dostęp 22.07.2018].
24. Forde B. [2017], Using Blockchain to Keep Public Data Public, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/using-blockchain-to-keep-public-data-public [dostęp 1.07.2018].
25. Frydman R., Duncan I., Goldberg M. D. [2007], Imperfect Knowledge Economics: Exchange Rates and Risk, Princeton University Press.
26. Garzik J. [2015], Public Versus Private Blockchains, USA, bitfury.com/content/downloads/public-vs-private-pt1–1.pdf [dostęp 22.07.2018].
27. Hileman G., Rauchs M. [2017], 2017 Global Blockchain Benchmarking Study, [SSRN Scholarly Paper] Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3040224
[dostęp 2.07.2018].
28. Hurwicz L. [1973], The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation, „The American Economic Review”, 63 (2), s. 1–30.
29. Hurwicz L. [1994], Economic Design, Adjustment Processes, Mechanisms, and Institutions. „Economic Design”, 1 (1), s. 1–14.
30. Iansiti M., Lakhani K. R. [2017], The Truth About Blockchain, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain [dostęp 29.03.2018].
31. IBM [2017], CNW | IBM Announces Major Blockchain Collaboration with Dole, Driscoll’s, Golden State Foods, Kroger, McCormick and Company, McLane Company, Nestlé, Tyson Foods,
Unilever and Walmart to Address Food Safety Worldwide, www.newswire.ca/news-releases/ibm-announces-major-blockchain-collaboration-with-dole-driscolls-golden-state-foods-kroger-
mccormick-and-company-mclane-company-nestle-tyson-foods-unilever-and-walmart-to-address-food-safety-worldwide-641378083.html [dostęp 2.07.2018].
32. Ito J., Narula N., Ali R. [2017], The Blockchain Will Do to the Financial System What the Internet Did to Media, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/03/the-blockchain-will-do-to-
-banks-and-law-firms-what-the-internet-did-to-media [dostęp 7.01.2018].
33. Kenney M., Zysman J. [2015], Choosing a Future in the Platform Economy: The Implications and Consequences of Digital Platforms, Kauffman Foundation New Entrepreneurial Growth
Conference, www.brie.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/PlatformEconomy2DistributeJune21.pdf [dostęp 1.07.2018].
34. Kim H. M., Laskowski M. [2018], Toward an Ontology‐driven Blockchain Design for Supplychain Provenance – Business – ProQuest, „Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and
Management”, 25 (1), s. 18–27.
35. Konopczak M., Sieradzki R., Wiernicki M. [2010], Kryzys na światowych rynkach finansowych – wpływ na rynek finansowy w Polsce oraz implikacje dla sektora realnego, „Bank i Kredyt”,
41 (6).
36. Kshetri N. [2018], 1 Blockchain’s Roles in Meeting Key Supply Chain Management Objectives – Business – ProQuest, „International Journal of Information Management”, 39, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401217305248 [dostęp 2.07.2018].
37. Laffont J.‑J., Martimort D. [2009], The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model, Princeton University Press.
38. Leon D. C. de, Stalick A. Q., Jillepalli A. A., Haney M. A., Sheldon F. T. [2017], Blockchain: Properties and Misconceptions, „Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship”,
11 (3), s. 286–300.
39. Mainelli M. [2017], Blockchain Could Help Us Reclaim Control of Our Personal Data, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2017/10/smart-ledgers-can-help-us-reclaim-control-of-our-personal-data [dostęp 1.07.2018].
40. McWaters J., Galaski R. [2017], Beyond Fintech: A Pragmatic Assessment Of Disruptive Potential In Financial Services.
41. Nakamoto S. [2008], Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
42. Nowiński W., Kozma M. [2017], How Can Blockchain Technology Disrupt the Existing Business Models?, „Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review”, 5 (3), s. 173–188.
43. Nurisso G., Prescott E. S. [2017], The 1970 s Origins of Too Big to Fail, www.clevelandfed.org:/newsroom-and-events/publications/economic-commentary/2017-economic-commentaries/
ec-201717-origins-of-too-big-to-fail [dostęp 6.07.2018].
44. Oh J., Shong I. [2017], A Case Study on Business Model Innovations Using Blockchain: Focusing on Financial Institutions, „Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship”,
11 (3), s. 335–344.
45. Petersen M., Hackius N., See B. V. [2017], Mapping the Sea of Opportunities: Blockchain in Supply Chain and Logistics.
46. Pilkington M. [2016], Blockchain Technology: Principles and Applications, University of Burgundy.
47. PR Newswire [2017], Transparency-One and Microsoft Announce Blockchain Service for Supply Chain Transparency: Blockchain Initiative Will Enhance Security of Global Supply Chain
Data – Business – ProQuest, www.transparency-one.com/microsoft-blockchain-supply-chain-transparency [dostęp 2.07.2018].
48. Salviotti G., De Rossi L. M., Abbatemarco N. [2018], A Structured Framework to Assess the Business Application Landscape of Blockchain Technologies, hdl.handle.net/10125/50328
[dostęp 22.07.2018].
49. Schrage M. [2016], Instead of Optimizing Processes, Reimagine Them as Platforms, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2016/12/instead-of-optimizing-processes-reimagine-them-as-platforms [dostęp 1.07.2018].
50. Scott B. [2016], How Can Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology Play a Role in Building Social and Solidarity Finance?, The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development
(UNRISD), s. 25.
51. Tabarrok A., Cowen T. [2015], The End of Asymmetric Information, www.cato-unbound.org/2015/04/06/alex-tabarrok-tyler-cowen/end-asymmetric-information [dostęp 2.07.2018].
52. Tapscott D., Tapscott A. [2016], The Impact of the Blockchain Goes Beyond Financial Services, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2016/05/the-impact-of-the-blockchain-goes-beyond-financial-services [dostęp 29.03.2018].
53. Tasca P., Tessone C. [2018], Taxonomy of Blockchain Technologies. Principles of Identification and Classification, University of Zurich.
54. Täuscher K., Laudien S. M. [2018], Understanding Platform Business Models: A Mixed Methods Study of Marketplaces, „European Management Journal”, 36 (3), s. 319–329.
55. The Economist [2018], Blockchain Technology May Offer a Way to Re-decentralise the Internet, „The Economist”, www.economist.com/special-report/2018/06/30/blockchain-technology-
may-offer-a-way-to-re-decentralise-the-internet [dostęp 9.07.2018].
56. Tucker C., Catalini C. [2018], What Blockchain Can’t Do, „Harvard Business Review”, hbr.org/2018/06/what-blockchain-cant-do [dostęp 1.07.2018].
57. Tullock G. [1988], Efficient Rent-Seeking Revisited, w: The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking, Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy, Springer, Boston, MA, s. 91–94, link.springer.
com/chapter/10.1007/978–1–4757–1963-5_7 [dostęp 28.07.2018].
58. World Economic Forum [2015], Deep Shift Technology Tipping Points and Societal Impact, www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf
[dostęp 2.07.2018].
59. Wüst K., Gervais A. [2017], Do You Need a Blockchain?, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, s. 7.
60. Xu X., Weber I., Staples M., Zhu L., Bosch J., Bass L., Pautasso C., Rimba P. [2017], A Taxonomy of Blockchain-Based Systems for Architecture Design, w: 2017 IEEE International Conference
on Software Architecture (ICSA), 2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA). s. 243–252.
Downloads
Published
2019-07-13
How to Cite
Ciupa, K. (2019). Blockchain Application Options and Their Selection Models. Studies and Work of the Collegium of Management and Finance , (173), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2019.173.6
Issue
Section
Articles
