Projectification. Concept, Scope and Consequences
Keywords:
project management, projectification, research resultsAbstract
The growing significance of projects in the activities of an organisation is a source of phenomenon referred to in the literature as projectfication. It may have consequences for organisations, but also for individuals and the whole economy. It requires a change in the approach to organisation management as well as planning and development of individual careers. Thus, it seems well-founded to conduct research whose aim would be to survey the scale of projectification in Poland.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Building Organizational Capabilities, McKinsey report 2010.
2. Capital Projects and Infrastructure Spending, Outlook to 2025, PWC 2014.
3. http://wcpconsulting.com/pmi-statistics/
4. https://www.knowledgetrain.co.uk/resources/qualifications/prince2-popularity--grows
5. Jałocha B., Projectification of the European Union and its Implications for Public Labour Market Organisations in Poland, „Journal of Project, Program&Portfolio Management” 2012, vol. 3, no. 2.
6. Juchniewicz M., Osiąganie doskonałości w realizacji projektów przy wykorzystaniu modeli dojrzałości projektowej, w: Zarządzanie projektami – wyzwania i wyniki badań, red. M. Trocki, E. Bukłaha, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2016.
7. Kuura, A., Policies for Projectification: Support, Avoid or Let it Be? Discussions on Estonian Economic Policy, „Theory and Practice of Economic Policy” 2011, 19(1).
8. Maylor H., Brady T., Cooke-Davies T., Hodgson D., From Projectification to Programmification, „International Journal of Project Management” 2006, 24(8).
9. Midler C., “Projectification” of the Firm: The Renault Case, „Scandinavian Journal of Management” 1995, 11(4).
10. Nieto-Rodriguez A., The Focused Organizations, Gower, London 2012.
11. PMI Annual Report 2013.
12. PMI Industry Growth Forecast, Project Management between 2010 and 2020.
13. Skeibrok J., Svennson F.L., The Degree of Projectification in Organizations, and its Impact on Strategic Flexibility: A Quantitative Study of the Norwegian Economy, University of Adger 2016.
14. Spałek S., Zwiększanie stopnia dojrzałości w zarządzaniu projektami. Koncepcje, uwarunkowania i możliwe zastosowania praktyczne, „Marketing i Rynek” 2014, nr 5.
15. Wagner R., Organisationale Kompetenz im Projektmanagement, GPM, Nuernberg 2011.
16. Wald A., Wagner R., Schneider C., Schoper Y., Towards a Measurement of “Projectification”: A Study on the Share of Project Work in the German Economy, w: A. Wald, R. Wagner, C. Schneider,&M. Gschwendtner (Eds.), Advanced Project Management:
Flexibility and Innovative Capacity (vol. 4), Neumarkt: GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V. 2015.
17. Zarządzanie projektami – wyzwania i wyniki badań, red. M. Trocki, E. Bukłaha, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH w Warszawie, Warszawa 2016.Projectification. Concept, Scope and Consequ
2. Capital Projects and Infrastructure Spending, Outlook to 2025, PWC 2014.
3. http://wcpconsulting.com/pmi-statistics/
4. https://www.knowledgetrain.co.uk/resources/qualifications/prince2-popularity--grows
5. Jałocha B., Projectification of the European Union and its Implications for Public Labour Market Organisations in Poland, „Journal of Project, Program&Portfolio Management” 2012, vol. 3, no. 2.
6. Juchniewicz M., Osiąganie doskonałości w realizacji projektów przy wykorzystaniu modeli dojrzałości projektowej, w: Zarządzanie projektami – wyzwania i wyniki badań, red. M. Trocki, E. Bukłaha, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa 2016.
7. Kuura, A., Policies for Projectification: Support, Avoid or Let it Be? Discussions on Estonian Economic Policy, „Theory and Practice of Economic Policy” 2011, 19(1).
8. Maylor H., Brady T., Cooke-Davies T., Hodgson D., From Projectification to Programmification, „International Journal of Project Management” 2006, 24(8).
9. Midler C., “Projectification” of the Firm: The Renault Case, „Scandinavian Journal of Management” 1995, 11(4).
10. Nieto-Rodriguez A., The Focused Organizations, Gower, London 2012.
11. PMI Annual Report 2013.
12. PMI Industry Growth Forecast, Project Management between 2010 and 2020.
13. Skeibrok J., Svennson F.L., The Degree of Projectification in Organizations, and its Impact on Strategic Flexibility: A Quantitative Study of the Norwegian Economy, University of Adger 2016.
14. Spałek S., Zwiększanie stopnia dojrzałości w zarządzaniu projektami. Koncepcje, uwarunkowania i możliwe zastosowania praktyczne, „Marketing i Rynek” 2014, nr 5.
15. Wagner R., Organisationale Kompetenz im Projektmanagement, GPM, Nuernberg 2011.
16. Wald A., Wagner R., Schneider C., Schoper Y., Towards a Measurement of “Projectification”: A Study on the Share of Project Work in the German Economy, w: A. Wald, R. Wagner, C. Schneider,&M. Gschwendtner (Eds.), Advanced Project Management:
Flexibility and Innovative Capacity (vol. 4), Neumarkt: GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V. 2015.
17. Zarządzanie projektami – wyzwania i wyniki badań, red. M. Trocki, E. Bukłaha, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH w Warszawie, Warszawa 2016.Projectification. Concept, Scope and Consequ
Downloads
Published
2023-05-04
How to Cite
Juchniewicz, M. (2023). Projectification. Concept, Scope and Consequences. Studies and Work of the Collegium of Management and Finance , (159), 43–60. Retrieved from https://econjournals.sgh.waw.pl/SiP/article/view/3208
Issue
Section
Articles
