Developing new products: continuity and change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33119/SIP.2024.197.12Keywords:
New Product Development (NPD), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Sustainability Management Plan (SMP), approaches to new product development: operational/engineering, integrated/ process-based, organizational, sustainableAbstract
The article discusses the issues related to the development of new products, focusing on the continuity and evolution of the process. Product is a key concept in management, and the process of creating and introducing products to the market is the main goal of organizations. The essence of management is to harmonize teamwork in the product development process. The aim of the authors was to organize the knowledge in the field of new product development and to present methodologies and concepts for their creation based on the authors’ own model of cognitive activity, which was used for critical evaluation and systematization of the existing knowledge from the literature and the authors’ own experiences. The model of cognitive activity presented in the article includes research assumptions covering ontological, terminological, axiological, and epistemological categories. The research process begins with the identification of research needs, which define research problems. The analysis of these problems leads to the identification of research approaches and the evolution of knowledge in the field of new product development. Four approaches to new product development were presented: operational/engineering, integrated/ process-based, organizational, and sustainable. Breakthrough changes in new product development arise from practical and theoretical inspirations and impact NPD (New Product Development) management, conceptual models, standards, and development perspectives. Four such breakthrough changes were identified in the article: from the spontaneous to operational approach, from operational to integrated, from integrated to organizational, and from organizational to sustainable. An analysis of the new approach to sustainable product development CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) and tools such as SMP (Sustainability Management Plan) and GMP P5 standard were also presented, which integrate CSR principles into new product development management. The perspective of further development includes taking into account additional factors arising from the dynamically changing business environment.
Downloads
References
Wydawnictwa zwarte
Amanowicz, M. (1977). Struktura procesu projektowania. Modele teoretyczne a praktyka. Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN.
APQP (2008). Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) and Control Plan. Reference Manual. Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors.
Booz, Allen, Hamilton (1968). Management of New Products. New York.
BPM CBOK (2014). BPM CBOK Business Process Management BPM Common Body of Knowledge Version. Giessen: Verlag Dr Gotz Schmidt.
Carboni, J. B., Duncan, W., Gonzalez, M., Milsom, P., Young, M. (2020). Zrównoważone zarządzanie projektami. Podręcznik GPM. Kraków: pm2pm.
Crum, L. W. (1973). Analiza wartości. Warszawa: PWE.
Daizhong Su (Ed.). (2020). Sustainable Product Development: Tools, Methods, and Examples. Springer.
Dietrych, J. (1978). System i konstrukcja. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne.
Dworczyk, M. (1973). Organizacja technicznego przygotowania produkcji. Warszawa: PWE.
EFQM (2021). The EFQM Model, Now includes additional information on Use Cases, RADAR Guidelines and Scoring Profiles.
Gasparski, W. (1988). Projektoznawstwo. Elementy wiedzy o projektowaniu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowo-Techniczne.
Gasparski, W. (red.) (1974). Metodologia projektowania inżynierskiego. Warszawa: PWN.
Hammer, M., Champy, J. (1996). Reenginering w przedsiębiorstwie. Warszawa: Neumann Management Institute.
Kahn, K. B. (Ed.). (2013). The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Kanawaty, G. (1992). Introduction to work study. Genf: International Labour Organization.
Kasprzak, T. (red). (2005). Modele referencyjne w zarządzaniu procesami biznesu. Warszawa: Difin.
Kerzner, H. (2018). Project Management Best Practices: Achieving Global Excellence. 4th Edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J., Wong, V. (2001). Marketing. Podręcznik europejski. Warszawa: PWE.
Kuhn, T. S. (1985). Raz jeszcze o paradygmatach. W: Kuhn T. S. Dwa bieguny. Tradycja i nowatorstwo w badaniach naukowych (s. 406–439). Warszawa: PIW.
Kuhn, T. S. (2011). Struktura rewolucji naukowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.
Loch, Ch.H., Kavadias, S. (2008). Handbook of New Product Development Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Martyniak, Z. (1985). Inwentyka przemysłowa. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Związków Zawodowych.
Mueller, J. (1970). Grundlagen der Systematischen Heuristik. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
Nadler, G. (1980). The Planning and Design Approach. New York: Wiley.
Nicholas, J. (2010). New Product Development: A Maturity Model for New Product Development in Small to Medium Enterprises. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller. New York: Routledge.
OECD (2002). Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Frascati Manual.
Philips, F. Y. (Ed.) (1991). Concurrent Life Cycle Management. Austin.
Pszczołowski, T. (1978). Mała encyklopedia prakseologii i teorii organizacji. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Strang, K. D. (Ed.). (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of Research Design in Business and Management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Trocki, M. (red.). (2019b). Społeczna odpowiedzialność działalności projektowej. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Verein Deutscher Ingenieure VDI. (1989). Simultaneous Engineering. Düsseldorf.
Artykuły naukowe
Cooper, R. (1990). Stage-gate Systems: A New Tool for Managing New Products, Business Horizons, 33 (3).
Mann, D. (2001). An Introduction to TRIZ: The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving, Creativity and Innovation Management, 10 (2), s. 123–125.
Rogala, P. (2011). Zarządzanie procesami według norm ISO serii 9000, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 169.
Schimmoeller, L. (2010). Success factors of new product development processes, APEM Journal Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 5.
Sułkowski, Ł. (2016). Teorie, paradygmaty, metafory i ideologie zarządzania – kontrowersje wokół współczesnego dyskursu organizacji i zarządzania, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 422.
Trocki, M. (2019a). Podejścia badawcze do zarządzania projektami – geneza i ewolucja, Przegląd Organizacji, 1, s. 3–9.
Materialy internetowe
APQC (2023). APQC Process Classification Frameworks (PCF), www.apqc.org/pcf.
http://greenprojectmanagement.org/p5.
http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42–187.htm.
PRiSM (2015). PRiSM (PRojects integrating Sustainable Methods), PRiSM 2015 Final color scheme. www.greenprojectmanagement.org.
UN (1987). Raport of the World Commision on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Studies and Work of the Collegium of Management and Finance
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.